A functional evaluation of prosthetic foot kinematics during lower-limb amputee gait

Prosthetics and Orthotics International

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 213-223

  Goujon, H ^a   Bonnet, X ^a   Sautreuil, P ^b   Maurisset, M ^b   Darmon, L ^b   Fode, P ^c   Lavaste, F ^a,c  

^a ARTS ET MÉTIERS PARISTECH   (France)

^b Centre d'appareillage d'Ile de France   (France)

^c Ctr d'Etud et de Rech sur l'A   (France)

Author keywords

Gait; Prosthetic feet; Trans femoral; Trans tibial

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FOREFOOT; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GAIT; GROUND REACTION FORCE; HUMAN; KINEMATICS; LEG AMPUTATION; LEG PROSTHESIS; MALE; MUSCLE FORCE; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; TIME; WALKING; WEIGHT BEARING;

ADULT; AGED; AMPUTATION; ANKLE; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; BIOMECHANICS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; FOOT; GAIT; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TIBIA;

EID: 33749002809     PISSN: 03093646     EISSN: 17461553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03093640600805134     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Arya, A and Lees, A and Nirula, H and Klenerman, L. (1995) A biomechanical comparison of the SACH, Seattle and Jaipur feet using ground reaction forces Prosthet Orthot Int, 19, pp. 37-45.
2. Bonnet, X. (2004) Comportement du pied et de la cheville au cours de la marche de sujets asymptomatiques. Mémoire de DEA. Paris: Ecole Nationale Supérieure d'Arts et Métiers.
3. Boonstra, A and Schrama, J and Fidler, V and Eisma, W. (1994) The gait of unilateral transfemoral amputees Scand J Rehab Med, 26, pp. 217-223.
4. Cappozzo, A. (1984) Gait analysis methodology Hum Mov Sci, 3, pp. 27-50.
5. Cortes, A and Viosca, E and Hoyos, J and Prat, J and Sanchez-Lacuesta, J. (1997) Optimisation of the prescription for trans-tibial amputees Prosthet Orthot Int, 21, pp. 168-174.
6. Ehara, Y and Beppu, M and Nomura, S and Kunimi, Y and Takahashi, S. (1993) Energy storing property of so-called energy-storing prosthetic feet Arch Phys Med Rehab, 74, pp. 68-72.
7. Geil, M. (2001) Energy loss and stiffness properties of dynamic elastic response prosthetic feet J Prosthet Orthot, 13, pp. 70.
8. Geil, M and Parnianpour, M and Quesada, P and Berme, N and Solomonidis, S. (2000) Comparison of methods for the calculation of energy storage and return in a dynamic response prosthesis J Biomechanics, 33, pp. 1745-1750.
9. Hafner, B and Sanders, J and Czerniecki, J and Fergason, J. (2002) Energy storage and return prostheses: Does patient perception correlate with biomechanical analysis? Clin Biomechanics 17, pp. 325-344.
10. Leardini, A and Benedetti, M and Catani, F and Simoncini, L and Giannini, S. (1999) An anatomically based protocol for the description of foot segment kinematics during gait Clin Biomechanics, 14, pp. 528-536.
11. Lehman, J and Price, R and Boswell-Bessette, S and Dralle, A and Questad, K and deLateur, B. (1993) Comprehensive analysis of energy storing prosthetic feet: Flex Foot and Seattle Foot versus standard SACH foot Arch Phys Med Rehab, 74, pp. 1225-1231.
12. Marin, F and Allain, J and Diop, A and Maurel, N and Simondi, M and Lavaste, F. (1999) On the estimation of knee joint kinematics Hum Mov Sci, 18, pp. 613-626.
13. Menard, M and McBride, M and Sanderson, D and Murray, D. (1992) Comparative biomechanical analysis of energy-storing prosthetic feet Arch Phys Med Rehab, 73, pp. 451-458.
14. Menard, M and Murray, D. (1989) Subjective and objective analysis of an energy-storing prosthetic foot J Prosthet Orthot, 1, pp. 220.
15. Mizuno, N and Aoyama, T and Nakajima, A and Kasahara, T and Takami, K. (1992) Functional evaluation by gait analysis of various ankle-foot assemblies used by below knee amputees Prosthet Orthot Int, 16, pp. 174-182.
16. Postema, K and Hermans, H and De Vries, J and Koopman, H and Eisma, W. (1997) Energy storage and release of prosthetic feet - Part 1: biomechanical analysis related to user benefits Prosthet Orthot Int, 21, pp. 17-27.
17. Powers, C and Rao, S and Perry, J. (1998) Knee kinetics in trans-tibial amputee gait Gait Posture, 8, pp. 1-7.
18. Sjödahl, C and Jarnlo, G and Söderberg, B and Persson, B. (2002) Kinematic and kinetic gait analysis in the sagittal plane of trans-femoral amputees before ans after special gait reeducation Prosthet Orthot Int, 26, pp. 101-112.
19. Snyder, R and Powers, C and Fontaine, C and Perry, J. (1995) The effects of five prosthetic feet on the gait and loading of the sound side in dysvascular below-knee amputees J Rehab Res Dev, 32, pp. 309-315.
20. Underwood, H and Tokuno, C and Eng, J. (2004) A comparison of two prosthetic feet on the multi-joint and multi-plane kinetic gait compensations in individuals with a unilateral trans-tibial amputation Clin Biomechanics, 19, pp. 609-616.
21. Van der Linden, M and Solomonidis, S and Spence, W and Li, N and Paul, J. (1999) A methodology for studying the effects of various types of prosthetic feet on the biomechanics of trans-femoral amputee gait J Biomechanics, 32, pp. 877-889.
22. Wing, D and Hittenberger, D. (1989) Energy-storing prosthetic feet Arch Phys Med Rehab, 70, pp. 330-335.
23. Winter, D. (1988) Biomechanics of below-knee amputee gait J Biomechanics, 21, pp. 361-367.
24. Wu, G and Cavanagh, P. (1995) ISB recommendations for standardization in the reporting of kinematic data J Biomechanics, 28, pp. 1257-1261.