Functional status and health-related quality of life during inpatient stroke rehabilitation

American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 85, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 831-838

  Madden, Sharen ^a   Hopman, Wilma M ^a,b   Bagg, Stephen ^a   Verner, Jane ^c   O'Callaghan, Chris J ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b KINGSTON GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^c Providence Continuing Care Centre   (Canada)

Author keywords

FIM; Health Related Quality of Life; HRQOL; Rehabilitation; SF 36; Stroke

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEALTH STATUS; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; QUALITY OF LIFE; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT FORM 36; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STROKE;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; DATABASES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REHABILITATION CENTERS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33749002246     PISSN: 08949115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.phm.0000240666.24142.f7     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. World Health Organization WHOQOL Group: Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychol Med 1998;28:551-8
2. Hamilton BB, Granger CV: Disability outcomes following inpatient rehabilitation for stroke. Phys Ther 1994;74:494-503
3. Bagg S, Paris Pombo A, Hopman WM: Effect of age on functional outcomes after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 2002;33:179-85
4. Jonkman AJ, de Weerd AW, Vrijens NLH: Quality of life after first ischemic stroke. Acta Neurol Scand 1998;98:169-75
5. Hopman WM, Verner J: Quality of life during and following in-patient stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 2003;34:801-5
6. Anderson C, Laubscher S, Burns R: Validation of the short form 36 (SF-36) health survey questionnaire among stroke patients. Stroke 1996;27:1812-16
7. King RB: Quality of life after stroke. Stroke 1996;27:1467-72
8. de Haan RJ, Aaronson N, Limburg M, Hewer RL, van Crevel H: Measuring quality of life in stroke. Stroke 1993;24:320-7
9. McNaughton HK, Weatherall M, McPherson KM: Functional measures across neurologic disease states: analysis of factors in common. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:2184-8
10. Robinson-Smith G, Johnston MV, Allen J: Self-care self-efficacy, quality of life and depression after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:460-4
11. Ware JE Jr., Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B: SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1993.
12. Ware JE Jr., Kosinski M, Keller SD: SF-36 Physical and Mental Summary Scales: A User's Manual. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1994.
13. Deutsch A, Braun S, Granger CV: The functional independence measure (FIM instrument). Journal of Rehabilitation Outcomes Measures 1997;1:67-71
14. Guide for the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation (including the FIM instrument), Version 5.1. Buffalo, NY: State University of New York at Buffalo, 1997
15. Hagen S, Bugge C, Alexander H: Psychometric properties of the SF-36 in the early post-stroke phase. J Adv Nurs 2003;44:461-8
16. Williams LS, Weinberger M, Harris LE, Clark DO, Biller J: Development of a stroke-specific quality of life scale. Stroke 1999;30:1362-9
17. Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ: The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity and sensitivity to change. Stroke 1999;30:2131-40
18. Medical Outcomes Trust. What is the relationship between the SF-36 and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) in studies of outcomes of rehabilitation? http://www.sf-36.org/faq/generalinfo.aspx. Accessed January 4, 2006.
19. Duncan PW, Horner RD, Reker DM, et al: Adherence to postacute rehabilitation guidelines is associated with functional recovery in stroke. Stroke 2002;33:167-78