Effects of training on odor judges scoring intensity

Oral Diseases

Volumn 11, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2005, Pages 40-44

  Nachnani, S ^a   Majerus, G ^b   Lenton, P ^b   Hodges, J ^b   Magallanes, E ^a  

^a University Health Resources Group   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Odorants; Oral malodor; Organoleptic judges; Sensory panels; Training

Indexed keywords

BUTANOL; DIMETHYL SULFIDE; WATER;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CONFERENCE PAPER; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EXPERIENCE; HALITOSIS; HUMAN; JOB PERFORMANCE; ODOR JUDGE; OLFACTORY DISCRIMINATION; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; TRAINING;

BREATH TESTS; DIAGNOSIS, ORAL; EDUCATION; HALITOSIS; HUMANS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PILOT PROJECTS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; SMELL; SULFUR COMPOUNDS;

EID: 33748997539     PISSN: 1354523X     EISSN: 16010825     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2005.01088.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. ADA Council on Scientific Affairs (2003). Products used in the management of oral malodor. JADA 134: 209-214.
2. Allison VC, Katz SH (1919). An investigation of stenches and odours for industrial purposes. J Ind Eng Chem 11: 336-338.
3. Brinkman D, Goetzinger J, Cotton F et al (1980). Human evaluations of warning odorants in propane. In: Kuznicki J, Rutkiewic E, Johnson R, eds. Selected sensory methods: problems and approaches to measuring hedonics. Standard Technical Publications, ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, 773, pp. 49-59.
4. Chambers E, Wolf MB (eds) (1996). Sensory testing methods, 2nd edn. ASTM Manual Series, West Conshohocken, PA, 26.
5. Leibowitz H, Post R (1980). Capabilities and limitations of the human being as a sensor. In: Kuznicki J, Rutkiewic E, Johnson R, eds. Selected sensory methods: problems and approaches to measuring hedonics. Standard Technical Publication, ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, 773, pp. 3-10.
6. Subcommittee E 18.04 on Fundamentals of Sensory (1999). Standard practices for referencing suprathreshold odor intensity. Annual book of ASTM standards. ASTM E: West Conshohocken, PA, 11.01, pp. 544-599.
7. Wheeler J, Hoersch H, Mahy H et al (eds) (1981). Guidelines for the selection and training of sensory panel members. Standard Technical Publication, ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, 758.
8. Cain W (1988). Olfaction, perception and motivation. In: Atkinson R, Stevens SS, eds. Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology. New York, USA: Wiley, pp. 409-459.
9. Cain W, Johnson F (1978). Liability of odor pleasantness; influence of mere exposure. Perception 7: 459-465.
10. Dalton P, Wysocki C (1996). The nature and duration of adaptation following long-term odor exposure. Percept Psychophysics 58: 781-792.
11. Harper R (1972). Human senses in action. Churchill Livingston: London, UK, 358 pp.
12. Kostelc J, Preti G, Zelson P et al (1984). Oral odors in early experimental gingivitis. J Periodont Res 19: 303-312.
13. Laing DJ (1983). Natural sniffing gives optimum odor perception for humans. Perception 12: 99-117.
14. Lenton P, Majerus G, Levitt M et al (2004). Comparison of new breath-testing device to establish assessment methods. J Dent Res 83 (special issue A): No. 3330 (abstract).
15. McGinley C, McGinley M (2002). Odor testing biosolids for decision making. Proceedings at Water Environment Federation Specialty Conference, Austin, USA. http://www.fivesenses.com/Documents/Library/ 37%20Odor%20Testing%20Biosolids%20for%20Decision%20Making.pdf (Last accessed 30 January 2005).
16. Meilgaard M, Civille G, Carr BT (1999a). Sensory evaluation techniques, 3rd edn. CRC Press: Boca Raton.
17. Meilgaard M, Civille G, Carr BT (1999b). Sensory evaluation techniques, 3rd edn. CRC Press: Boca Raton, pp. 1-14.
18. Pangborn R (1981). Individuality in response to sensory stimuli. In: Solms J, Hall R, eds. Criteria of food acceptance. How man chooses what he eats. Forster-Verlag: Zurich, Switzerland, 177 pp.
19. Parducci A (1965). Category judgement: a range-frequency model. Psycho Rev 72: 407-418.
20. Rabin M (1988). Experience facilitates olfactory quality discriminations. Percept Psychophysics 44: 532-540.
21. Rawson N (1999). Cell and molecular biology of olfaction. Quint Inter 30: 335-341.
22. Rosenberg M, Septon I, Eli I et al (1991a). Halitosis measurement by an industrial sulphide monitor. J Periodontol 62: 487-489.
23. Rosenberg M, Kulkarni G, Bosy A et al (1991b). Reproducibility and sensitivity of oral malodor measurements with a portable sulphide monitor. J Dent Res 70: 1436-1440.
24. Schmidt NF, Missam SR, Taber WJ et al (1978). Correlation between organoleptic mouth-odor rating and levels of volatile sulfur compounds. Oral Surg 45: 560-567.
25. Shiffman HR (1996). Sensation and perception. An integrated approach, 4th edn. John Wiley & Sons: New York, USA. 43
26. Stevenson R, Boaks R, Prescott J (1998). Changes in odor sweetness resulting from implicit learning of a simultaneous odor sweetness association: an example of learned synesthesia. Leaning Motiv 29: 113-132.
27. Sulyok M, Haberhauer-Troyer C, Rosenberg E et al (2001). Investigation of the storage stability of selected volatile sulfur compounds in different sampling containers. J Chromatogr A 917: 367-374.
28. Tonzetich J (1971). Direct gas chromatographic analysis of sulfur compounds in mouth air of man. Arch Oral Biol 16: 587-597.
29. Yaegaki K (2002). The present status of halitosis treatment: Future of dental clinics predicted based on present North American dentistry. In: Ito K, Hanada K, eds. The Quintessence Year Book. Quintessence Publications: Tokyo, Japan, pp. 35-43.