Always articulating: Theorizing on mobile and wireless technologies

Information Society

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 311-323

  Sawyer, Steve ^a   Tapia, Andrea ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Articulation; Criminal justice; Field study; Information and communication technologies; Mobility; Organizations

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748992336     PISSN: 01972243     EISSN: 10876537     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01972240600904258     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Bowker, G., and Star, S. 1999. Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Eschenfelder, K. 2003. The Importance of articulation work to agency content management: Balancing publication and control. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, ed. E. Dennis, pp. 135-155. New York: IEEE Computer Press.
3. Færgemann, L., Schilder-Knudsen, T., and Carstensen, P. 2005. The duality of articulation work in large heterogenous settings-A study in health care. Paper presented at the 9th European Conference on CSCW, Paris, September.
4. Fjuk, A., and Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L. 1997. Articulation of actions in distributed collaborative learning. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 9(2):3-24.
5. Gasser, L. 1986. The integration of computing and routine work. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 4(3):205-225.
6. Klockars, C., and Mastrofski, S., eds. 1991. Thinking about police: Contemporary readings. New York: McGraw-Hill.
7. Maines, D. 1991. Social organization and social process: Essays in honor of Anselm Strauss. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.
8. Manning, P. 1996. Information technology in the police context: The "sailor" phone. Information Systems Research 7(1):275-289.
9. Manning, P. 1977. Police work: The social organization of policing. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
10. Manning, P. 2003. Policing contingencies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Markus, M., and Robey, D. 1988. Information technology and organizational change: Conceptions of causality in theory and research. Management Science 34(5):583-598.
12. Miles, M., and Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Nardi, B., and Engeström, Y. 1998. A web on the wind: The structure of invisible work, Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 8: 1-2.
14. Northrop, A., Kraemer, K., and King, J. 1995. Police use of computers. Journal of Criminal Justice 23(3):259-275.
15. Nunn, S., and Quinet, K. 2002. Evaluating the effects of information technology on problem-oriented-policing: If it doesn't fit, must we quit? Evaluation Review 26(1):81-108.
16. Orlikowski, W., and Iacono, S. 2001. Desperately seeking the "IT" in IT research-A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research 12(2):121-124.
17. Pattavina, A. 2005. Information technology and the criminal justice system. London: Sage.
18. Patterson, E., and Woods, D. (2001). Shift changes, updates, and the on-call model in space shuttle mission control. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 10(3-4):317-346.
19. Pennsylvania Justice Network. 2003. JNET Project Summary. http:// www.pajnet.state.pa.us/pajnet/cwp/view.asp?a=213&q=75743 (accessed 13 January 2003).
20. Pollock, N. 2005. When is a work-around? Conflict and negotiation in computer systems development. Science, Technology & Human Values 30(4):515-535.
21. Raposo, A., Gerosa, M., and Fuks, H. 2004. Combining communication and coordination toward articulation of collaborative activities. 10th International Workshop on Groupware-CRIWG 2004, San José, Costa Rica. In Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 3198-Groupware design, implementation, and use, eds. Gert-Jan de Vreede, L. A. Guerrero, and G. M. Raventós, pp. 121-136. London: Springer-Verlag.
22. Rudman, W., Clarke, R. and Metzel, J. 2003. Emergency responders: Drastically underfunded, dangerously unprepared. Report of an Independent Task Force Sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations. 29 July. http://www.cfr.org/pdf/Responders TF.pdf (accessed September 2003).
23. Schmidt, K., and Bannon, L. 1992. Taking CSCW seriously: Supporting articulation work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 1:7-40.
24. Simone, C., Mark, G., and Giubbilei, D. 1999. Interoperability as a means of articulation work. In Proceedings of AMC Conference on Work Activities Coordination and Collaboration, eds. D. Georgakopoulos, W. Prinz, and A. Wolf, pp. 39-48. San Francisco: ACM Press.
25. Spasser, M. 2000. Articulating collaborative activity: Design-in-use of collaborative publishing Services in the Flora of North America Project. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 12:149-172.
26. Star, S. 1991. The sociology of the invisible: The primacy of work in the writings of Anselm Strauss. In Social Organization And Social Process: Essays In Honor Of Anselm Strauss, ed. David Maines, pp. 265-283. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.
27. Star, S. 1995. Listening for connections: Introduction to symposium on the work of Anselm Strauss. Mind, Culture and Activity 2(4):1-7.
28. Star, S. 1997. Anselm Strauss: An appreciation. Sociological Research Online 2(1). http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/ 2/1/1.html (accessed September 2003).
29. Star, S. L., and Strauss, A. (1999). Layers of silence, arenas of voice: The ecology of visible and invisible work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 8:9-30.
30. Strauss, A. 1970. Discovering new theory from previous theory. In Human nature and collective behavior: Papers in honor of Herbert Blumer, ed. Tomatsu Shibutani, pp. 46-53. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
31. Strauss, A. 1985. Work and the division of labor. The Sociological Quarterly 26(1):1-19.
32. Strauss, A. 1993. Continual permutations of action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33. Suchman, L. 1987. Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Suchman, L. 1996. Supporting articulation work. In Computerization and controversy, ed. R. Kling, pp. 407-423. San Diego: Academic Press.
35. Thoresen, K. 1997. Workflow meets work practice. Accounting, Management and Information Technology 7(1):21-36.