![]() |
Volumn 113, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1883-
|
LASEK versus PRK
a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
CLINICAL ARTICLE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONFIDENCE INTERVAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DATA ANALYSIS;
EYE SURGERY;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW UP;
HUMAN;
INFORMED CONSENT;
LASER EPITHELIAL KERATOMILEUSIS;
LETTER;
MALE;
MYOPIA;
PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY;
PILOT STUDY;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROSPECTIVE STUDY;
RANDOMIZATION;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;
STUDENT T TEST;
VISUAL ACUITY;
VISUAL IMPAIRMENT;
WILCOXON SIGNED RANKS TEST;
ADULT;
CORNEA;
DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
KERATECTOMY, PHOTOREFRACTIVE, EXCIMER LASER;
KERATECTOMY, SUBEPITHELIAL, LASER-ASSISTED;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
MYOPIA;
PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
REFRACTION, OCULAR;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
VISUAL ACUITY;
WOUND HEALING;
|
EID: 33748964796
PISSN: 01616420
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.02.010 Document Type: Letter |
Times cited : (4)
|
References (2)
|