Regarding "Associations Between Socioeconomic Status and Cancer Survival"

Annals of Epidemiology

Volumn 16, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 789-791

  Gorey, Kevin M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCER; CANADA; CANCER SURVIVAL; COLON CANCER; DEFENSE MECHANISM; EDITORIAL; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; GEOGRAPHIC ORIGIN; HUMAN; LOWEST INCOME GROUP; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PUBLIC HEALTH INSURANCE; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; RURAL AREA; SOCIAL STATUS; UNITED STATES; URBAN AREA;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; NEOPLASMS; ONTARIO; RISK; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33748958887     PISSN: 10472797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2006.04.010     Document Type: Editorial

References (16)

1. Zhang-Salomons J., Qian H., Holowaty E., and Mackillop W.J. Associations between socioeconomic status and cancer survival: Choice of SES indicator may affect results. Ann Epidemiol (2006) in press
2. Boyd C., Zhang-Salomons J.Y., Groome P.A., and Mackillop W.J. Associations between community income and cancer survival in Ontario, Canada, and the United States. J Clin Oncol 17 (1999) 2244-2255
3. Gorey K.M., Holowaty E.J., Fehringer G., et al. An international comparison of cancer survival: Toronto, Ontario, and Detroit, Michigan, metropolitan areas. Am J Public Health 87 (1997) 1156-1163
4. Gorey K.M., Holowaty E.J., Fehringer G., Laukkanen E., Richter N.L., and Meyer C.M. An international comparison of cancer survival: Metropolitan Toronto, Ontario and Honolulu, Hawaii. Am J Public Health 90 (2000) 1866-1872
5. Gorey K.M., Holowaty E.J., Fehringer G., Laukkanen E., Richter N.L., and Meyer C.M. An international comparison of cancer survival: Relatively poor areas of Toronto, Ontario and three US metropolitan areas. J Public Health Med 22 (2000) 343-348
6. Gorey K.M., Kliewer E., Holowaty E.J., Laukkanen E., and Ng E.Y. An international comparison of breast cancer survival: Winnipeg, Manitoba and Des Moines, Iowa, metropolitan areas. Ann Epidemiol 13 (2003) 32-41
7. McDavid K., Tucker T.C., Sloggett A., and Coleman M.P. Cancer survival in Kentucky and health insurance coverage. Arch Intern Med 163 (2003) 2135-2144
8. Richardson L.C., Tian L., Voti L., et al. The roles of teaching hospitals, insurance status, and race/ethnicity in receipt of adjuvant therapy for regional-stage breast cancer in Florida. Am J Public Health 96 (2006) 160-166
9. Voti L., Richardson L.C., Reiss I., Fleming L.E., Mackinnon J., and Coebergh J.W. The effect of race/ethnicity and insurance in the administration of standard therapy for local breast cancer in Florida. Breast Cancer Res Treat 95 (2006) 89-95
10. Bradley C.J., Given C.W., and Roberts C. Health care disparities and cervical cancer. Am J Public Health 94 (2004) 2098-2103
11. Bradley C.J., Given C.W., and Roberts C. Late stage cancers in a Medicaid-insured population. Med Care 41 (2003) 722-728
12. Jargowsky P.A. Poverty and Place: Ghettos, Barrios, and the American City (1997), Sage, New York
13. Krieger N., Chen J.T., Waterman P.D., Rehkopf D.H., and Subramanian S.V. Race/ethnicity, gender, and monitoring socioeconomic gradients in health: A comparison of area-based socioeconomic measures-The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project. Am J Public Health 93 (2003) 1655-1671
14. Krieger N., Chen J.T., Waterman P.D., Soobader M., Subramanian S.V., and Carson R. Geocoding and monitoring of US socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and cancer incidence: Does the choice of area-based measure and geographic level matter? The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project. Am J Epidemiol 156 (2002) 471-482
15. Hajnal Z.L. The nature of concentrated urban poverty in Canada and the United States. Can J Sociol 20 (1995) 497-528
16. Geronimus A.T., and Bound J. Use of census-based aggregate variables to proxy for socioeconomic group: Evidence from national samples. Am J Epidemiol 148 (1998) 475-486