Expert witness testimony: Rules of engagement

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 223-227

  Satiani, Bhagwan ^a,b  

^a THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Means Hall ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EXPERT WITNESS; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; LAW SUIT; LEGAL COMPETENCE; LEGAL EVIDENCE; MALPRACTICE; MANDATORY PROGRAM; NEGLIGENCE; SHORT SURVEY;

EXPERT TESTIMONY; HUMANS; JUDICIAL ROLE; LIABILITY, LEGAL; MALPRACTICE; MEDICINE;

EID: 33748952327     PISSN: 15385744     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/153857440604000307     Document Type: Short Survey

References (12)

1. Angell M: Shattuck lecture: Evaluating the health risks of breast implants: The interplay of medical science, the law, and public opinion. N Engl J Med 334:1513-1518, 1996.
2. Tanya Albert, AM News staff. Aug. 4, 2003. California Court throws out "speculative" expert testimony.
3. Tanya Albert, AM News staff. February 16, 2004. California Court says experts shouldn't speculate.
4. United States v. Barker, 553 F.2d 1013, 1024 [6th Cir. 1977].
5. United States v. Frye, 293 F. 1013 D.C. Cir. 1923.
6. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 113 S. Ct. 27861993.
7. Annas GJ: Scientific evidence in the courtroom: The death of the Frye Rule. N Engl J Med 330:1018-1021, 1994.
8. Field TG Jr, Keegan CM: Daubert's significance. http://www.piercelaw.edu/
9. Gatowski S, Dobbin JT, Richardson GP: Asking the Gatekeepers: A national survey of judges on judging expert evidence in a post-Daubert world. Law Hum Behav 25:433-458, 2001.
10. Shuman DW: Expertise in law, medicine and healthcare. J Health Politics, Policy Law 26:267-290, 2001.
11. Reardon TR: Report of the Board of Trustees 5-A-98 Subject: Expert witness testimony. http://www.truthinjustice.org/amareport.htm
12. Walter C, Black EP: Keeping junk science out of the courtroom, http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/ieee/ieee29.htm