The conundrum of conservation education and the conservation mission

Conservation Biology

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 1337-1339

  Bride, Ian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGY; EDITORIAL; EDUCATION; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; METHODOLOGY; RESEARCH;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOLOGY; EDUCATION; RESEARCH;

EID: 33748947680     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00544.x     Document Type: Editorial

References (22)

1. Biodiversity Project. 1996. Human values and nature future: Americans' attitudes on biological diversity: an analysis of findings from a national survey. Beldon, Russonello and Stuart, Washington, D.C.
2. Biodiversity Project. 2002. Americans and biodiversity: new perspectives in 2002. Beldon, Russonello and Stuart, Washington, D.C.
3. Brewer, C. 2002. Outreach and partnership programs for conservation education where endangered species conservation and research occur. Conservation Biology 16:4-6.
4. Bride, I. 2002. As dead as a dodo? Public understanding and support vis-à-vis biodiversity and biodiversity loss. Ph.D. thesis. University of Kent, Canterbury, United Kingdom.
5. Fleischner, T. L. 1990. Integrating science and passion in conservation education. Conservation Biology 4:452-453.
6. Hagan, J. M. 1995. Environmentalism and the science of conservation biology. Conservation Biology 9:975-976.
7. Jacobson, S. K. 1990. Graduate education in conservation biology. Conservation Biology 4:431-440.
8. Kaiser, F. G., and U. Fuhrer. 2003. Ecological behavior's dependency on different forms of knowledge. Applied Psychology 54:598-613.
9. Kaiser, F. G., S. Wöllfing, and U. Fuhrer 1999. Environmental attitude and ecological behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology 19:1-19.
10. McDaniel, J. 2002. Spirituality and sustainability. Conservation Biology 16:1461-1464.
11. Nadkani, N. M. 2004. Not preaching to the choir: communicating the importance of forest conservation to nontraditional audiences. Conservation Biology 18:602-606.
12. Neisenbaum, R. A., and T. Lewis 2003. Ghettoization in conservation biology: how interdisciplinary is our teaching? Conservation Biology 17:1202-1203.
13. Orr, D. W. 1993. Architecture as pedagogy I. Conservation Biology 7:597-600.
14. Orr, D. W. 1996. Slow knowledge. Conservation Biology 10:609-702.
15. Orr, D. W. 1997. Architecture as pedagogy II. Conservation Biology 11:597-600.
16. Orr, D. W. 2000. Ideasclerosis: parts I and II. Conservation Biology 14:926-928, 1571-1573.
17. SCB. 2005. Society for conservation biology code of ethics. Conservation Biology 19:3.
18. Takacs, D. 1996. The idea of biodiversity: philosophies of paradise. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.
19. Thomas, A. and M. Chetwynd 1995. Biodiversity: the professionals' view. Social and Community Planning Research and The Living Earth Foundation, London.
20. Trombulak, S. C., K. S. Omland, J. A. Robinson, J. J. Lusk, T. L. Fleischner, G. Brown, and M. Domroese 2004. Principles of conservation biology: recommended guidelines for conservation literacy from the education committee of the society for conservation biology. Conservation Biology 18:1180-1190.
21. Uhl, C. et al. 1996. Sustainability: a touchstone concept for university operations, education, and research. Conservation Biology 10:1308-1311.
22. Wals, A. E. 1999. Environmental education and biodiversity. IKC-report no. 36. National Reference Centre for Nature Management, Wageningen, The Netherlands.