Advances in colonoscopic imaging

Reviews in Gastroenterological Disorders

Volumn 6, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2006, Pages

  Rex, Douglas K ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer; Endoscopy; Polypectomy

Indexed keywords

CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER INCIDENCE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; POLYPECTOMY; REVIEW;

COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; HUMANS;

EID: 33748942495     PISSN: 1533001X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1977-1981.
2. Citarda F, Tomaselli G, Capocaccia R, et al. Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence. Gut. 2001;48:812-815.
3. Thiis-Evensen E, Hoff G, Sauar J, et al. Population-based surveillance by colonoscopy: effect on the incidence of colorectal cancer. Telemark Polyp Study I Scand. J Gastroenterol. 1999;34:414-420.
4. Muller AD, Sonnenberg A. Prevention of colorectal cancer by flexible endoscopy and polypectomy. A case-control study of 32,702 veterans. Ann Intern Med. 1995;123:904-910.
5. Schatzkin A, Lanza E, Curle D, et al. The Polyp Prevention Trial Study Group. Lack of effect of a low-fat, high-fiber diet on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. N Engl J Med. 2000;342: 1149-1155.
6. Alberts D, Martinez M, Roe D, et al. The Phoenix Colon Cancer Prevention Physicians' Network. Lack of effect of a high-fiber cereal supplement on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1156-1162.
7. Robertson DJ, Greenberg ER, Beach M, et al. Colorectal cancer in patients under close colonoscopic surveillance. Gastroenterology. 2005;129: 34-41.
8. Singh H, Turner D, Xue L, et al. Risk of developing colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy examination: evidence for a 10-year interval between colonoscopies. JAMA. 2006;295:2366-2373.
9. Harewood GC, Sharma VK, de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:76-79.
10. Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European Multicenter Study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:378-384.
11. Atkin W, Rogers P, Cardwell C, et al. Wide variation in adenoma detection rates at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2004; 126:1247-1256.
12. Sanchez W, Harewood GC, Petersen BT. Evaluation of polyp detection in relation to procedure time of screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:1941-1945.
13. Barclay R, Vicari JJ, Johanson JF, Greenlaw RI. Variation in adenoma detection rates and colonoscopic withdrawal times during screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61: AB107.
14. Chen S, Rex DK. Endoscopist is comparable to age and gender as predictor of adenomas at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:S393.
15. Rex DK. Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:33-36.
16. Rex D, Chadalawada VH. Wide angle colonoscopy with a prototype instrument: impact on miss rates and efficiency determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98: 2000-2005.
17. Deenadayalu VP, Chadalawada V, Rex DK. 170 degrees wide-angle colonoscope: effect on efficiency and miss rates. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004; 99:2138-2142.
18. Fatima H, Rex DK, Rahmani E, et al. Wide-angle (WA) (170° angle of view) versus standard (ST) (140° angle of view) colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:AB204.
19. Matsushita M, Hajiro K, Okazaki K, et al. Efficacy of total colonoscopy with a transparent cap in comparison with colonoscopy without the cap. Endoscopy. 1998;30:444-447.
20. Kondo S, Yamaji Y, Yamada A, et al. Usefulness of hood attached to the tip of colonoscope for detection of colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:AB213.
21. Lee Y, Hui AJ, Wong VW et al. A randomized controlled study comparing cap-assisted colonoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy: a preliminary result. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006; 63:AB226.
22. Harrison M, Singh N, Rex DK. Impact of proximal colon retroflexion on adenoma miss rates. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:519-522.
23. Triadafilopoulos G, Watts D, Higgins J, Van Dam J. A novel retrograde-viewing auxiliary imaging device ("Third Eye Retroscope™") improves the detection of simulated polyps in anatomical models of the colon. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006; 63:AB103.
24. Brooker JC, Saunders BP, Shah SG, Williams CB. Endoscopic resection of large sessile colonic polyps by specialist and non-specialist endoscopists. Br J Surg. 2002;89:1020-1024.
25. Hurlstone DP, Cross SS, Slater R, et al. Detecting diminutive colorectal lesions at colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial of pan-colonic versus targeted chromoscopy. Gut. 2004;53:376-380.
26. Le Rhun M, Coron E, Parlier D, et al. High resolution colonoscopy with chromoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for the detection of colonic neoplasia: a randomized study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:349-354.
27. Stoffel EM, Stockwell DH, Normolle DP, et al. Chromoendoscopic colonoscopy detects more adenomas than conventional colonoscopy: a randomized trial of back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:AGA48.
28. Alder A, Papanikolaou IS, Pohl H, et al. A prospective randomized study between narrow band imaging and conventional wide-angle colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterology. 2006;63:AB199.
29. Helbig C, Rex DK. Narrow band imaging (NBI) versus white-light (WL) for colon polyp detection using high definition (HD) colonoscopes. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:AB213.
30. Zanati S, Marcon NE, Cirocco M, et al. Onco-life fluorescence imaging during colonoscopy assists in the differentiation of adenomatous and hyperplastic polyps and improves detection rate of dysplastic lesions in the colon. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:A27-A28.
31. Namihisa A, Kawakubo Y, Ogihara T, et al. Detectability of colorectal neoplasms by newly developed auto-fluorescence imaging video colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63: AB227.
32. Jass JR. Hyperplastic polyps and colorectal cancer: is there a link? Clin Gastroentrol Hepatol. 2004;2:1-8.
33. Chen S, Rex DK. Correlation between detection of adenomas and non-adenomas: an argument for real time differentiation of non-adenomatous colonic polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. In press.
34. Fu KI, Sano Y, Kato S, et al. Chromoendoscopy using indigo carmine dye spraying with magnifying observation is the most reliable method for differential diagnosis between non-neoplastic and neoplastic colorectal lesions: a prospective study. Endoscopy. 2004;36:1089-1093.
35. Machida H, Sano Y, Hamamoto Y, et al. Narrow-band imaging in the diagnosis of colorectal mucosal lesions: a pilot study. Endoscopy. 2004;36: 1094-1098.
36. Sano Y, Horimatsu T, Fu KI, et al. Magnified observation of microvascular architecture using narrow band imaging (NBI) for the differential diagnosis between non-neoplastic colorectal lesions. A prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:B102.
37. Kiesslich R, Goetz M, Hoffman A, et al. Screening colonoscopy with confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) for in vivo diagnosis of colorectal neoplasias. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:A102.