Radiographic assessment of impacted mandibular third molar sockets filled with composite xenogenic bone graft

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 371-375

  Munhoz, E A ^a   Ferreira Jr , O ^a   Yaedu, R Y F ^a   Granjeiro, J M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Bone grafting; Digital direct radiography; Third molars; Xenogenic bone

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE GRAFT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL DEVICE; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; ENAMEL; HUMAN; MOLAR TOOTH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TOOTH FILLING;

ABSORBABLE IMPLANTS; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BONE DENSITY; BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEINS; BONE REGENERATION; BONE SUBSTITUTES; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CATTLE; DURAPATITE; FEMALE; GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION, PERIODONTAL; HUMANS; MALE; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; MOLAR, THIRD; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TOOTH SOCKET; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 33748939620     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/64880289     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bataineh AB, Albashaireh ZS, Hazza'a AAM. The surgical removal of mandibular third molars: a study in decision making. Quintessence Int 2002; 33: 613-617.
2. Kugelberg CF, Ahlström U, Ericson S, Hugoson A. Periodontal healing after impacted lower third molar surgery. A retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1985; 14: 29-40.
3. Ralley L, Chapnick P, Baker G. The impacted third molar. J Canad Dent Ass 1977; 43: 364-366.
4. NIH consensus development conference for removal of third molars. J Oral Surg 1980; 38: 235-236.
5. Peterson LJ, Ellis III E, Hupp JR, Tucker MR. Contemporary oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2nd edn. St Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book; 1993.
6. Punwutikorn J, Waikakul A, Ochareon P. Symptoms of unerupted mandibular third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 87: 305-310.
7. Eslami A, Sadeghi E, Van Swol RL. The prevalence of osseous defects on the distal aspects of the mandibular second molar in the absence of the third molar in a dental student population. Quintessence Int 1985; 16: 363-366.
8. Kugelberg CF. Periodontal healing two and four years after impacted lower third molar surgery. A comparative retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990; 19: 341-345.
9. Kugelberg CF, Ahlström U, Ericson S, Hugoson A. Periodontal healing after impacted lower third molar surgery. A retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986; 15: 675-686.
10. Kugelberg CF, Ahlström U, Ericson S, Hugoson A, Kvint S. Periodontal healing after impacted lower third molar surgery in adolescents and adults. A prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991; 20: 18-24.
11. Marmary Y, Brayer L, Tzukert A, Feller L. Alveolar bone repair following extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986; 61: 324-326.
12. Peng KY, Tseng YC, Shen EC, Chiu SC, Fu E, Huang YW. Mandibular second molar periodontal status after third molar extraction. J Periodontol 2001; 72: 1647-1651.
13. Dodson TB. Reconstruction of alveolar bone defects after extraction of mandibular third molars. A pilot study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996; 82: 241-247.
14. Muzzarelli RA, Biagini G, Bellardini M, Simonelli L, Castaldini C, Fratto G. Osteoconductive properties of methylpyrrolidinone chitosan in an animal model. Biomaterials 1993; 14: 925-929.
15. Petri III WH, Wilson TM. Clinical evaluation of antibiotic-supplemented bone allograft. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993; 51: 982-985, discussion 986.
16. Throndson RR, Sexton BS. Grafting mandibular third molar extraction sites: a comparison of bioactive glass to a nongrafted site. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radio Endod 2002; 94: 413-419.
17. Camargo PM, Lekovic V, Weinlaender M, Klokkevold PR, Kenney EB, Dimitrijevic B, et al. Influence of bioactive glass on changes in alveolar process dimensions after exodontia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 90: 581-586.
18. Winter GB. Impacted third molars. St Louis, MO: Am Med Book; 1926.
19. Pell GJ, Gregory GT. Report on a term-year study of a tooth division technique for the removal of impacted teeth. Am J Orthod 1942; 28: 660.
20. Urist MR. Bone: formation by autoinduction. Science 1965; 150: 893-899.
21. Bishop K, Dummer PMH, Kingdon A, Newcombe RG. Reproducibility of repeat bitewing radiographs determined by measurement of the distance between the amelocemental junction and the alveolar crest: an ex vivo study using human skulls. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995; 24: 173-178.
22. Duinkerke ASH, Van de Poel ACM, Van der Linden FPGM, Doesburg WH, Lemmens AJG. Evaluation of a technique for standardized periapical radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1977; 44: 646-651.
23. Hausmann E, Allen K, Christersson L, Genco R. Effect of x-ray beam vertical angulation on radiographic alveolar crest level measurement. J Periodont Res 1989; 24: 8-19.
24. Hausmann E, Allen K, Dunford R, Christersson L. A reliable computerized method to determine the level of the radiographic alveolar crest. J Periodont Res 1989; 24: 368-369.
25. Jean A, Soyer A, Epelboin Y, Ouhayoun JP. Digital image ratio: a new radiographic method for quantifying changes in alveolar bone. Part II: Clinical application. J Periodont Res 1996; 31: 533-539.
26. Meister Jr F, Nery EB, Angell DM, Meister RC. Periodontal assessment following surgical removal of mandibular third molars. Gen Dent 1986; 34: 120-123.
27. Carmagnola D, Adriaens P, Berglundh T. Healing of human extraction sockets filled with Bio-Oss®. Clin Oral Impl Res 2003; 14: 137-143.
28. Poumarat G, Squire P. Comparison of mechanical properties of human, bovine bone and a new processed bone xenograft. Biomaterials 1993; 14: 337-340.