Usability evaluation of multi-modal biometric verification systems

Interacting with Computers

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 1101-1122

  Toledano, Doroteo T ^a   Fernández Pozo, Rubén ^b   Hernández Trapote, Álvaro ^b   Hernández Gómez, Luis ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Biometrics; Evaluation; Fingerprint recognition; Identity verification; Signature recognition; Usability; Voice recognition

Indexed keywords

ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; SECURITY SYSTEMS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; USABILITY ENGINEERING;

BIOMETRICS; FINGERPRINT RECOGNITION; IDENTITY VERIFICATION; SIGNATURE RECOGNITION;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 33748916060     PISSN: 09535438     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.intcom.2006.01.004     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Atal B.S. Automatic recognition of speakers from their voices. Proceedings of the IEEE 64 (1976) 460-475
2. BioSec, 2003. BioSec: Biometric and Security. www.biosec.org/
3. BioVision, 2003. Roadmap for Biometric in Europe to 2010. Available: www.eubiometricsforum.com/dmdocuments/BIOVISION_Roadmap.pdf (Accessed: 2004, July 27)
4. BKnC, 2003. A Biometric Research Agenda and the Course of Biometrics Research. International Conference on Biometric Authentication. Biometric Knowledge Center, West Virginia University. www.wvu.edu/~bknc/BiometricResearchAgenda.pdf
5. Brostoff S., and Sasse A. Are passfaces more usable than passwords? A field trial investigation. In: McDonald S., Waern Y., and Cockton G. (Eds). People and Computers XIV-Usability or Else! Proceedings of HCI 2000 (2000), Springer, Sunderland, UK 405-424
6. Brunelli R., and Falavigna D. Person identification using multiple cues. IEEE Transactions on PAMI 12 10 (1995) 955-966
7. BWG, 2000. Best Practices in Testing and Reporting Performance in Biometric Devices. Biometrics Working Group (UK). Version 1.0.
8. Campbell J.P. Speaker recognition: a tutorial. Proceedings of the IEEE 85 9 (1997) 1437-1462
9. CIC, 2004. Communication Intelligence Corporation, 'iSign for Java,' www.cic.com/support/faq/iSign/Java/iSignjava.html
10. Citizenship & Immigration Canada, 2003. Tracking Public Perception of Biometrics. Available at: www.cic.gc.ca/english/press/03/poll-biometrics-e.pdf (Accessed: 2004, July 27).
11. Doddignton, G.R., Przybocki, M.A., Martin, A.F., Reynolds, D.A., 2000. The NIST speaker recognition evaluation-Overview, methodology, systems, results, perspective. Speech Communication 31 (2/3), 225-254.
12. Economist, 2003. Prepare to be scanned-will biometric passports improve security? The Economist Technology Quarterly, 20-22.
13. Friedman, B., & Felten, E., 2002. Informed consent in the Mozilla browser: implementing value-sensitive design. Proceedings of the 35 Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Available at: www.ischool.washington.edu/networksecurity/outcomes.html (Accessed: 2004, July 27).
14. Frokjaer E., Hertzum M., and Hornbaek K. Measuring usability: are effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction really correlated?. CHI Letters 2 1 (2000) 345-352
15. Gerd tom Markotten, D., 2002. User-centered security engineering. In Proceedings of The Fourth Nordic EurOpen/USENIX Conference, Helsinki, Finland.
16. Gillan D., and Cooke N. Methods of cognitive analysis in HCI. Proceedings of the CHI'95 (1995), ADM, New York pp. 349-350
17. Gish H., and Schmidt M. Text-independent speaker identification. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 11 (1994) 18-32
18. Haptek, 2004. Haptek. www.haptek.com/
19. Hitachi, 2002. Standardization of accuracy evaluation for biometric authentication in Japan. Available at: www.sdl.hitachi.co.jp/ipa_biotest/english/index_english.html (Accessed: 2004, July 27).
20. International Biometric Group, 2003. Comparative Biometric Testing, Official Test Plan, version 2.13. Available at: www.biometricgroup.com/reports/public/comparative_biometric_testing.html (Accessed: 2004, July 14).
21. International Biometric Group, 2004. Comparative Biometric Testing. Available at: www.ibgweb.com/reports/public/comparative_biometric_testing.html (Accessed: 2004, July 27).
22. ISO 9241-11, 1998. Ergonomic requirements for office work with viual display terminals (VDTs)-Part 11: Guidance on usability.
23. ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 37 N457, 2004. Biometric Performance Testing and Reporting-Part 1: Test Principles. American National Standards Institute.
24. Jain A.K., Bolle R., and Pankanti S. Biometrics-Personal Identification in Networked Society (1999), Kluwer, Norwell, MA
25. Kanade, T., 1973. Picture processing system by computer complex and recognition of human faces. Doctoral Dissertation, Kyoto University.
26. Liu, S., Silverman, M., 2001. A practical Guide to Biometric Security Technology. IEEE Computer Society, IT Pro-Security.
27. Mansfield, T. & Rejman-Greene, M., 2003. Feasibility Study on the Use of Biometrics in an Entitlement Scheme. Report UKPS, DVLA and the Home Office. IMSC/H07/D2.
28. Matsumoto T., Matsumoto H., Yamada K., and Hoshino S. Impact of artificial 'Gummy' fingers on fingerprint systems. Proceedings of SPIE 4677 (2002) 275-289
29. Matyas, V., Riha, Z., 2002. Biometric authentication-security and usability. Proceedings of the Communications and Multimedia Security Conference. Available at: www.fi.muni.cz/usr/matyas/cms_matyas_riha_biometrics.pdf (Accessed: 2004, July 27).
30. Microsoft, 2003. Secure User Authentication for the Next-generation Secure Computing Base. Available at: www.microsoft.com/resources/ngscb/documents/ngscb_authentication.doc (Accesed: 2004, July, 27).
31. NIST, 2003. Summary of NIST Standards for Biometric Accuracy, Tamper Resistance, and Interoperability. Report to US Congress. Available at: www.itl.nist.gov/iad/894.03/NISTAPP_Nov02.pdf (Accessed: 2004, July 27).
32. Nuance, 2004. Nuance Communications Inc. www.nuance.com
33. Ortega-García J., Bigun J., Reynolds D., and González-Rodríguez J. Authentication gets personal with biometrics. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 21 2 (2004) 50-62
34. Oviatt, S., 2000. Multimodal interface research: a science without borders. In: Proceedings of the Conference of Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP), vol. 3, pp. 1-6.
35. Patric, A.S., 2004. Usability and acceptability of biometric security systems. Proceedings of the Financial Cryptography Conference (FC04). West FL.
36. Phillips, P.J., Martin, A., Wilson, C.L., Przybocki, M., 2000. An introduction to evaluation biometric systems. IEEE Computer 33 (2), 56-63.
37. Podio, F.L., 2001. Biometrics-Technologies for Highly Secure Personal Authentication. NIST Publications. ITL Bulletin.
38. Poh, N., Bengio, S., Korczak, J., 2002. A multi-sample multi-source model for biometric authentication. IEEE International Workshop on Neural Networks for Signal Processing (NNSP).
39. Precise Biometrics, 2004. Precise Biometrics. www.precisebiometrics.com/
40. Putte T.v.d. Forging ahead. Biometric Technology Today 10 (2001) 9-11
41. Sasse, M.A., 2004. Usability and Trust in Information Systems. Cyber Trust & Crime Prevention Project. University College London.
42. Schaick P., and Ling J. Using on-line surveys to measure three key constructs of the quality of human-computer interaction in web sites: psychometric properties and implications. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59 (2003) 545-567
43. Scheuermann, D., Schwiderski-Grosche, S., & Struif, B., 2000. Usability of Biometrics in Relation to Electronic Signatures. EU Study 502533/8. GMD-German National Research Center for Information Technology. Institute for Secure Telecooperation (SIT).
44. Schneier B. Secrets and Lies: Digital Security in a Networked World (2000), Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
45. Schneier B. Beyond Fear: Thinking Sensibly About Security in an Uncertain World (2003), Copernicus Books, New York
46. Seymour, R., Powel, D., 2000. Better Design-The Burglar Alarm. www.designcouncil.info/betterbydesign/security/challenge.html (Accessed: 2004, July 27).
47. Shen W., Surette M., and Khanna R. Evaluation of automated biometrics-based identification and verification systems. Proceedings of the IEEE 85 9 (1997) 1464-1478
48. SUMI, 2005. Software Usability Measurement Inventory. http://www.ucc.ie/hfrg/questionnaires/sumi/index.html (Accessed: 2005, November 3).
49. Uitenbroek, D.G., 1997. SISA: Simple Interactive Statistical Analysis. Available: home.clara.net/sisa/ (Accessed: 2004, July 14).
50. Vogel, D., Balakrishnan R. Interactive public ambient displays: transitioning from implicit to explicit, public to personal, interaction with multiple users, In: Proceedings ACM UIST 2004.
51. Whitten, A., Tygar, D., 1999. Why Johnny can't encrypt: a usability evaluation of PGP 5.0. Proceedings of the 8th USENIX Security Symposium, Washington DC. Available: www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/sec99/whitten.html (Accessed: 2004, July 27).
52. Zhang, D.D. (Eds.), 2002. Biometric Solutions for Authentication in an E-world. Kluwer, Norwell, MA.
53. Zimmermann P.R. The official PGP user's guide (1995), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
54. Zurko, M.E., Simon, D. (1996). User-centered security. Proceedings of the 1996 Workshop on New Security Paradigms. ACM Press, Lake Arrowhead CA, New York, pp. 27-33.