IMRT delivery techniques

Image-Guided IMRT

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 73-90

  Webb, Steve ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF CANCER RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748883684     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-30356-1_7     Document Type: Chapter

References (90)

1. Webb S (1993) The physics of three-dimensional radiation therapy: conformal radiotherapy, radiosurgery and treatment planning. IOPP, Bristol
2. Webb S (1997) The physics of conformal radiotherapy: advances in technology. IOPP, Bristol
3. Webb S (2000) Intensity modulated radiation therapy. IOPP, Bristol
4. Webb S (2004) Contemporary IMRT: Developing Physiks and Clinical Implementation. IOP Publishing, Bristol, UK
5. Shepard DM, Earl MA, Yu CX, Xiao Y (2003) Aperture-based inverse planning. In: Palta JR, Mackie TR (eds) Intensitymodulated radiation therapy - the state of the art. Medical Physics Publishing, Madison,Wisconsin, USA, pp 115-137
6. Ellis F, Hall EJ, Oliver R (1959) A compensator for variation in tissue thickness for high energy beams. Br J Radiol 32:421
7. Donovan EM, Johnson U, Shentall G, Evans PM, Neal AJ, Yarnold JR (2000) Evaluation of compensators in breast radiotherapy - a planning study usingmultiple static fields. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 46:671-679
8. Xu T, Shikhaliev PM, Al-Ghazi M, Molloi S (2002) Reshapable physical modulator for intensity modulated radiation therapy. Med Phys 29:2222-2228
9. Warrington AP, Adams EJ (2002) Cobalt-60 teletherapy for cancer - a revived treatment modality for the 21st century. Proc Semon Appropriate Medical Technology for Developing Countries. Feb 6th 2002, IEEE, London, pp 21.1-21.19
10. Webb S, Lomax A (2001) There is no IMRT? Phys Med Biol 46:L7-L8
11. Kijewski PK, Chin LM, Bjärngard BE (1978) Wedge-shaped dose distributionsby computer controlled collimatormotion. Med Phys 5:426-429
12. Convery DJ, Rosenbloom ME (1992) The generation of intensity- modulatedfields for conformal therapybydynamic collimation. Phys Med Biol 37:1359-1374
13. Stein J, Bortfeld T, Dörschel B, Schlegel W (1994) Dynamic X-ray compensation for conformal radiotherapy bymeans of multileaf collimation. Radiother Oncol 32:163-173
14. Spirou SV, Chui CS (1994) Generation of arbitrary intensity profiles by dynamic jaws or multileaf collimators. Med Phys 21:1031-1041
15. SvenssonR, KällmannP,BrahmeA(1994) Analytical solution for the dynamic control of multileaf collimators. Phys Med Biol 39:37-61
16. Webb S (2001) Concepts for shuttling multileaf collimators for intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol 46:637-651
17. Dai J-R, Hu Y-M (1999) Intensity-modulation radiotherapy using independent collimators: an algorithm study.Med Phys 26:2562-2570
18. Webb S (2002) Intensity-modulated radiation therapy using only jaws and a mask. Phys Med Biol 47:257-275
19. Webb S (2002) Intensity-modulated radiation therapy using only jaws and a mask - 2: A simplified concept of single bixel attenuators. Phys Med Biol 47:1869-1879
20. Webb S, Hartmann G, Echner G, Schlegel W (2003) Intensity modulated radiation therapy using a variable aperture collimator. Phys Med Biol 48:1223-1238
21. Webb S, Hartmann G, Echner G, SchlegelW(2003) Intensity modulated radiation therapy using a variable aperture collimator (VAC). ESTRO, Geneva, Sept 2003. Radiother Oncol 68(Supplement 1):S97
22. Gscheidlen W (1959) Device for collimation of a ray beam. US Pat 2904692
23. Yu C (1995) Intensity modulated arc therapy with dynamic multileaf collimation: An alternative to tomotherapy. Phys Med Biol 40:1435-1449
24. Webb S (1998) Configuration options for intensity-modulated radiation therapy using multiple-static fields shaped by a multileaf collimator. Phys Med Biol 43:241-260
25. Webb S (1998) Configuration options for intensity-modulated radiation therapy using multiple-static fields shaped by a multileaf collimator: 2. Constraints and limitations on 2D modulation. Phys Med Biol 43:1481-1495
26. Bortfeld T, Kahler DL, Waldron TJ, Boyer AL (1994) X-ray field compensation with multileaf collimators Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Med Phys 28:723-730
27. Bortfeld T, Boyer AL, Schlegel W, Kahler DL, Waldron TJ (1994) Realisation and verification of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapywithmodulated fields. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Med Phys 30:899-908
28. Adams EJ, Convery DJ, Warrington AP, Webb S (2001) IMRT planning at the Royal Marsden NHS Trust using TMS. Insights 3(1):1-2
29. Xia P, Verhey L (1998) Multileaf collimator leaf-sequencing algorithm for intensity modulated beams with multiple static segments. Med Phys 25:1424-1434
30. Que W (1999) Comparison of algorithms for multileaf collimator field segmentation. Med Phys 26:2390-2396
31. Langer M, Thai V, Papiez I (2001) Improved leaf sequencing reduces segments or monitor units needed to deliver IMRT using multileaf collimators. Med Phys 28:2450-2458
32. Deng J, Pawlicki T, Chen Y, Li J, Jiang SB,Ma C-M (2001) The MLC tongue-and-groove effect on IMRT dose distributions. Phys Med Biol 46:1039-1060
33. Otto K, Clark BG (2002) Enhancement of IMRT delivery through MLC rotation Phys Med Biol 47:3997-4017
34. Cho PS, Marks RJ II (2000) Hardware-sensitive optimisation for intensity modulated radiotherapy. PhysMed Biol 45:429-440
35. Seco J, Evans PM,Webb S (2001) Analysis of the effects of the delivery techniqueonanIMRTplan: comparison formultiple static field, dynamic and NOMOS MIMiC collimation. Phys Med Biol 46:3073-3087
36. Seco J, Evans PM, Webb S (2002) An optimisation algorithm that incorporated IMRT delivery constraints. Phys Med Biol 47:899-915
37. Budgell GJ, Martens C, Claus F (2001) Improved delivery efficiency for step and shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy using a fast-tuning magnetron. PhysMed Biol 46:N253-N261
38. Evans PM, Donovan EM, Partridge M, Childs P, Convery DJ, Eagle S, Hansen VN, Suter B, Yarnold JR (2000) The delivery of intensity modulated radiotherapy to the breast using multiple static fields. Radiother Oncol 57:78-89
39. Boyer AL, Desobry GE, Wells NH (1991) Potential and limitations of invariant kernel conformal therapy. Med Phys 18:703-712
40. Webb S (1991) Optimisation by simulated annealing of three-dimensional conformal treatment planning for radiation fields defined by a multileaf collimator. Phys Med Biol 36:1201-1226
41. Wittkämper FW, Brugmans MJP, Lebesque JV, van der HorstA,Mijnheer RJ (1998)Clinical implementation of IMRT in the Netherlands Cancer Institute. Proc. Elekta Oncology Systems First Users Conf (Palm Springs, CA 2988), pp 76-83
42. De NeveW, deWagter C, de Jaeger K, Thienpont M, Colle C, Derycke S, Schelfhout J (1996) Planning and delivering high doses to targets surrounding the spinal cord at the lower neck and upper mediastinal levels: static beam-segmentationtechnique executed by a multileaf collimator. Radiother Oncol 40:2171-2179
43. Fraass BA, Kessler ML, McShan DL, Marsh LH, Watson BA, Dusseau WJ, Eisbruch A, Sandler HM, Lichter AS (1999) Optmization and clinical use of multisegment intensity-modulated radiation therapy for high-dose conformal therapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 9:60-77
44. Vicini FA, SharpeM, Kestin L, Martinez A, Mitchell CK,Wallace MF, Matter R, Wong J (2002) Optimising breast cancer treatment efficacy-with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 54:1336-1344
45. Convery DJ, Webb S (1998) Generation of discrete beamintensity modulation by dynamic multileaf collimation under minimum leaf separation constraints. Phys Med Biol 43:2521-2538
46. Convery DJ, Cosgrove VP, Webb S (2000) Improving dosimetric accuracy of a dynamicMLC technique. In: SchlegelW, Bortfeld T (eds) Proc 13th Int Conf on the Use of Computers in Radiation Therapy, pp 277-279
47. Van Santvoort JPC, Heijmen BJM (1996) Dynamic multileaf collimationwithout "tongue-and-groove" underdose effects. Phys Med Biol 41:2091-2105
48. Webb S, Bortfeld T, Stein J, Convery D (1997) The effect of stair-step transmission on the "tongue-and-groove problem" in dynamic radiotherapy with a multileaf collimator. Phys Med Biol 42:595-602
49. ShepardD, Earl M,Naqvi S,YuCX(2002)Aninverse planning tool for intensity-modulated arc therapy.Med Phys 29(6):1336
50. Yu CX, Li XA,Ma L, Chen D, Naqvi S, Shepard D, Sarfaraz M, Holmes TW, Suntharalingam M, Mansfield CM (2002) Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated arc therapy. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 53(2):453-463
51. GalvinJM(1999) Themultileaf collimator - a complete guide. Proceedings of the 1999 Annual Meeting of the AAPM
52. (see also Medical Physics 26:1092-1093)
53. Bortfeld T, Schlegel W, Höver K-H, Schulz-Ertner D (1999) Mini and micro multileaf collimators. Handout material, 41st annual meeting of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, July 1999. www:http://www.aapm.org/meetings/99AM/pdf/2796-50260.pdf
54. Webb S (2003) Historical perspective on IMRT. In: Palta JR, Mackie TR (eds) Intensity modulated radiation therapy - the state of the art. Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp 1-23
55. CarolMP, TargovnikH, CampbellC, BleierA, Strait J, RosenB, Miller P, Scherch D,Huber R, Thibadeau B, Dawson D, Ruff D (1993) An automatic 3D treatment planning and implementation system for optimised conformal therapy. In: Minet P (ed) Three-dimensional treatment planning. Pierre Minet, Liege, pp 173-187
56. Sternick ES (1997) (ed) The theory and practice of intensity modulated radiation therapy. Advanced Medical Publishing, Madison,WI, USA
57. Webb S (1989) Optimisation of conformal dose distributions by simulated annealing. Phys Med Biol 34:1349-1370
58. Carol MP (1997)Where we go from here: on person's vision. In: Sternick ES (ed) The theory and practice of intensity modulated radiation therapy. Advanced Medical Publishing, Madison, WI, pp 243-252
59. Mackie TR, Holmes T, Swerdloff S, Reckwerdt P, Deasy JO, Yang J, Paliwal B, Kinsella T (1993) Tomotherapy: A new concept for the delivery of dynamic conformal radiotherapy Med Phys 20:1709-1719
60. Mackie TR, Olivera GH, Kapatoes JM, Ruchala KJ, Balog JP, Tomé WA, Hui S, Kissick M, Wu C, Jeraj R, Reckwerdt PJ, Harari P, Ritter M, Forrest L, Welsh J, Mehta MP (2003) Helical tomotherapy. In: Palta JR, Mackie TR (eds) Intensity modulated radiation therapy - the state of the art. Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, WI, USA, pp 247-284
61. Welsh JS, Olivera GH, Mackie TR (2003) Novel uses and applications of IMRT. In: Palta JR, Mackie TR (eds) Intensity modulated radiation therapy - the state of the art. Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, WI, USA, pp 875-882
62. Swerdloff S, Mackie TR, Holmes T (1994) Analytical solution for the dynamic control of multileaf collimators. US Pat 5317616
63. Swerdloff S,Mackie TR,Holmes T (1994)Multi-leaf radiation attenuator for radiation therapy. US Pat 5351280
64. Schweikard A, Glosser G, Bodduluri M, Murphy M, Adler JR (2000) Roboticmotion compensation for respiratory motion in radio-surgery. Comput Aided Surg 5(4):263-277
65. Fiorino C, Fossati V, Ardesi A, Cattaneo GM, del Vecchio A, Fusca M, Longobardi B, Signorotto P, Calandrino R (1993) Development of a computer controlled moving bar (CCMB) conformal technique for neck irradiation. Radiother Oncol 27:167-170
66. Schreiner LJ (2001) The potential for intensity modulated radiation therapy with cobalt 60. NORDION Insights 3(1):3
67. Barthold S, Echner G, Hartmann G, Pastyr O, Schlegel W (2002) CoRA - A new cobalt radiotherapy arrangement with multiple sources - a feasibility study. Phys Med 19:13-26
68. Fielding AL, Evans PM (2001) The use of electronic portal images to verify the delivery of intensity modulated radiotherapy beams produced with dynamic multi-leaf collimation. Radiother Oncol 61 Supplement 1, S26
69. Fielding AL, Evans PM, ClarkCH(2002) The use of electronic portal imaging to verify patient position during intensity modulated radiotherapy delivered by the dynamicMLC technique. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 54(4):1225-1234
70. Wu C, JerajR,Olivera GH,Mackie TR (2002)Re-optimization in adaptive radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 47:3181-3195
71. Keall P, Wu Q, Wu Y, Kim JO (2003) Dynamic MLC IMRT. In: Palta JR, Mackie TR (eds) Intensity-modulated radiation therapy - the state of the art. Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, WI, USA, pp 319-371
72. Schulz RJ, Kagan (2002) On the role of intensity modulated radiation therapy in radiation oncology. Med Phys 29(7):1473-1480
73. Kavanagh BD (2003) The emperor's new isodose curves.Med Phys 30:2559-2560
74. Chang SX, Cullip TJ, Deschesne KM, Miller EP, Rosenman JG (2004) Compensators: an alternative IMRT delivery technique. J Appl Clin Med Phys 5(3):15-36 PMID: 15753937
75. Xu T, Al-Ghazi MS,Molloi S (2004) Treatment planning considerations of reshapeable automatic intensity modulator for intensity modulated radiation therapy. Med Phys Aug; 31(8):2344-2355 PMID: 15377101
76. Kamath S, Sahni S, Palta J, Ranka S, Li J (2004) Optimal leaf sequencing with elimination of tongue-and-groove underdosage. Phys Med Biol 49(3):N7-19 PMID: 15012015
77. Que W, Kung J, Dai J (2004) 'Tongue-and-groove' effect in intensity modulated radiotherapy with static multileaf collimator fields. Phys Med Biol 49(3):399-405 PMID: 15012009
78. Haryanto F, Fippel M, Bakai A, Nusslin F (2004) Study on the tongue and groove effect of theElektamultileaf collimator usingMonte Carlo simulation and film dosimetry. Strahlenther Onkol 180(1):57-61 PMID: 14704846
79. Chow JC, Seguin M, Alexander A (2005) Dosimetric effect of collimating jaws for small multileaf collimated fields. Med Phys 32(3):759-765 PMID: 15839348
80. Burmeister J, McDermott PN, Bossenberger T, Ben-Josef E, Levin K, Forman JD (2004) Effect of MLC leaf width on the planning and delivery of SMLC IMRT using the CORVUS inverse treatment planning system. Med Phys 31(12):3187-3193 PMID: 15651601
81. Kamath S, Sahni S, Palta J, Ranka S (2004) Algorithms for optimal sequencing of dynamic multileaf collimators. Phys Med Biol 49(1):33-54 PMID: 14971771
82. Dvorak P,GeorgD, Bogner J, Kroupa B, DieckmannK, Potter R (2005) Impact of IMRT and leaf width on stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver and lung lesions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61(5):1572-1581 PMID: 15817364
83. Jin JY, Yin FF, Ryu S, Ajlouni M, Kim JH (2005) Dosimetric study using different leaf-width MLCs for treatment planning of dynamic conformal arcs and intensity-modulated radiosurgery. Med Phys 32(2):405-411 PMID: 15789586
84. Leal A, Sanchez-Doblado F, Arrans R, Capote R, Lagares JI, Pavon EC, Rosello J (2004)MLC leafwidth impact on the clinical dose distribution: a Monte Carlo approach. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 59(5):1548-1559 PMID: 15275743
85. Chauvet I, Petitfils A, Lehobey C, Kristner JY, Brunet Y, Lembrez R, Gaboriaud G, Mazal A, Zefkili S, Rosenwald JC (2005) The sliding slit test for dynamic IMRT: a useful tool for adjustment of MLC related parameters. PhysMed Biol 50(4):563-80 PMID: 15773620
86. Venencia CD, Besa P (2004) Commissioning and quality assurance for intensity modulated radiotherapy with dynamic multileaf collimator: experience of the Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile. J Appl ClinMed Phys 5(3):37-54 PMID: 15753938
87. Stell AM, Li JG, Zeidan OA, Dempsey JF (2004) An extensive log-file analysis of step-and-shoot intensity modulated radiation therapy segment delivery errors. Med Phys 31(6):1593-602 PMID: 15259664
88. Wang L, Movsas B, Jacob R, Fourkal E, Chen L, Price R, Feigenberg S, Konski A, Pollack A, Ma C. Stereotactic IMRT for prostate cancer: dosimetric impact ofmultileaf collimator leaf width in the treatment of prostate cancer with IMRT. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2004 Spring;5(2):29-41. Epub 2004 Apr 1. PMID: 15738911 [PubMed - in process]
89. Kamath S, Sahni S, Ranka S, Li J, Palta J. Optimal field splitting for large intensity-modulated fields. Med Phys. 2004 Dec;31(12):3314-23. PMID: 15651614 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
90. Abdel-Hakim K, Nishimura T, Takai M, Sakahara H. Review of monoisocentric split-field technique for conventional and IMRT treatment in head and neck cancers: technical limitations and approaches for optimization. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2005 Feb;4(1):107-13. PMID: 15649094 [PubMed - in process]