Estimates of U.S. regional commodity trade elasticities of substitution

Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2002, Pages

  Bilgic, Abdulbaki ^a   King, Stephen ^b   Lusby, Aaron ^b   Schreiner, Dean F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748871589     PISSN: 10904999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Armington, P.A. 1969. A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production. International Monetary Fund Staff Papers, 16:159-76.
2. Berck, P., E. Golan, B. Smith, J. Barnhart, and A. Dabalen. 1996. Dynamic Revenue Analysis for California. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Finance.
3. Chung, Jae Wan, 1994. Utility and Production Functions. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers.
4. de Melo, J. and D. Tarr. 1992. A General Equilibrium Analysis of US Foreign Trade Policy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
5. Dixon P., B. Parmenter, J. Sutton, and D. Vincent. 1982. ORANI A Multisectoral Model of the Australian Economy. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
6. Gazel, R. 1996. Free Trade Agreements and Interregional Labor Migration: The Case of the U.S. and Canada. Annals of Regional Science, 30 (4):373-90.
7. Greene, W. 1997. Econometric Analysis. Third Ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
8. Hoffmann, S., S. Robinson, and S. Subramanian. 1996. The Role of Defense Cuts in the California Recession: Computable General Equilibrium Models and Interstate Factor Mobility. Journal of Regional Science, 36(4):571-95.
9. Johansen, L. 1960. A Multi-Sectoral Study of Economic Growth. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
10. Kraybill, D. S., T. G. Johnson, and D. Orden. 1992. Macroeconomic Imbalances: A Multiregional General Equilibrium Analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 74(3):726-36.
11. Morgan, W., J. Mutti, and M. Partridge. 1989. A Regional General Equilibrium Model of the United States: Tax Effects on Factor Movements and Regional Production. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(4):626-35.
12. Partridge, M.D. and D. S. Rickman. 1998. Regional Computable General Equilibrium Modeling: A Survey and Critical Appraisal. International Regional Science Review, 21(3):205-248.
13. Reinert, K. A., and D. W. Roland-Holst. 1990. Disaggregated Armington Elasticities for the Mining and Manufacturing Sectors of the United States. (Working Paper, May 15), Washington, D.C.: U.S. International Trade Commission.
14. Reinert, K. A., and D. W. Roland-Holst. 1992. Armington Elasticities for United States Manufacturing Sectors. Journal of Policy Modeling, 14(5):531-639.
15. Robinson, S., S. Hoffman, and S. Subramanian. 1994. Defense Spending Reductions and the California Economy: A Computable General Equilibrium Model. Working Paper No. 688. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Berkeley.
16. Roland-Holst, D. W., K. A. Reinert, and C. R. Shiells. 1994. A General Equilibrium Analysis of North American Economics Integration. In Modeling Trade Policy: Applied General Equilibrium Assessments of North American Free Trade, J. F. Francois, and C. R. Shiells, eds., New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 47-82.
17. Schreiner, D. F., D. W. Marcouiller, G. Tembo, and E. E. Vargas. 1999. Computable General Equilibrium for Regional Analysis. In Web-based Learning Material in Regional Science, S. Loveridge, ed., Morgantown, WV: West Virginia University, Regional Research Institute, (http://rrri.wvr.edu/regscweb.htm).
18. Shiells, C. R., and K. A. Reinert. 1993. Armington Models and Terms of Trade Effects: Some Econometric Evidence for North America. Canadian Journal of Economics, 26(2):299-316.
19. Shiells, C. R., R. M. Stern, and A. V. Deardorff. 1983. Estimates of the Elasticities of Substitution Between Imports and Home Goods for the United States. Institute of Public Policy Studies Discussion Paper No. 183. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Institute of Public Policy Studies. 36 pp.
20. Shiells, C. R., R. M. Stern, and A. V. Deardorff. 1986. Estimates of the Elasticities of Substitution Between Imports and Home Goods for the United States. Weltwirtshaftliches Archiv, 122:497-519.
21. Stern, R. M., J. Francis, and B. Schumacher. 1986. Price Elasticities in International Trade: An Annotated Bibliography. For the Trade Policy Research Center. London: Macmillan.
22. Stern, R. M., J. Francis, and B. Schumacher. 1976. Price Elasticities in International Trade: An Annotated Bibliography. Toronto: Macmillan of Canada.
23. U.S. Department of Commerce. 1997. 1993 Commodity Flow Survey. Compact Disc dBASE format, CD-CFS-93-3A, CD-CFS-93-3B. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce Administrative and Customer Service Division.
24. Vargas, E. E. and D. F. Schreiner. 1999. Modeling Monopsony Market with Regional CGE: The Oklahoma Forest Products Industry Case. The Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, Vol. 29, No. 2:51-74.
25. Waters, E., D. W. Holland, and B. A. Weber. 1997. Economic Impacts of a Property Tax Limitation: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis of Oregon's Measure 5. Land Economics, 73(1):72-89.
26. Whalley, J., and I. Trela. 1986. Regional Aspects of Confederation. Vol. 68, Royal Commission on the Economic Union and Development Prospects of Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.