Dietitians' opinions and experiences of client-centred nutrition counselling

Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research

Volumn 67, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 119-124

  MacLellan, Debbie L ^a   Berenbaum, Shawna ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANADA; COUNSELING; DIETETICS; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUTRITION; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT EDUCATION; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ADULT; CANADA; COUNSELING; DATA COLLECTION; DIETETICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; NUTRITION PHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 33748860663     PISSN: 14863847     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3148/67.3.2006.119     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Dietitians of Canada. Professional standards for dietitians in Canada. Toronto: Dietitians of Canada; 2000.
2. MacLellan D, Berenbaum S. Client-centred nutrition counselling: do we know what it means? Can J Diet Prac Res 2003;64:12-5.
3. Hardy D, O'Brien A, Gaskin C, et al. Practical application of the Delphi technique in a bicultural mental health nursing study in New Zealand. J Adv Nurs 2004;46:95-109.
4. McKenna H. The Delphi technique: a worthwhile approach for nursing? J Adv Nurs 1994;19:1221-5.
5. Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs 2000;32:1008-15.
6. Law M, Baptiste S, Mills J. Client-centred practice: what does it mean and does it make a difference? Can J Occup Ther 1995;62:250-7.
7. Gage M, Polatajko H. Naming practice: the case for the term client-driven. Can J Occup Ther 1997;62:115-8.
8. Fearing V, Law M, Clark J. An occupational performance process model: fostering client and therapist alliances. Can J Occup Ther 1997;64:7-15.
9. Patton M. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1990.
10. Leedy P, Ormrod J. Practical research. 7th ed. Toronto: Prentice Hall; 2001.
11. Uhl P. Using the Delphi technique in institutional planning. In: Uhl P, ed. New directions for institutional research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1983. p. 81-94.
12. Miles M, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: a sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications; 1994.
13. Seidman I. Interviewing as qualitative research, a guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. 2nd ed. New York: Teachers College Press; 1998.
14. Morse J, Richards L. Readme first for a user's guide to qualitative methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2002.
15. Thomas D. A general inductive approach for qualitative data analysis. Auckland, NZ: University of Auckland; 2003.
16. Sumsion T, Smyth G. Barriers to client-centredness and their resolution. Can J Occup Ther 2000;67:15-21.
17. Wilkins S, Pollock N, Rochon S, Law M. Implementing client-centred practice: why is it so difficult? Can J Occup Ther 2001;68:70-9.
18. Thorne S, Nyhlin K, Paterson B. Attitudes towards patient expertise in chronic illness. Int J Nurs Stud 2000;37:303-11.
19. Holman H, Lorig K. Patients as partners in managing chronic disease. BMJ 2000;320:526-7.
20. Sumsion T. The Delphi technique: an adaptive research tool. Br J Occup Ther 1998;61:153-6.
21. Williams P, Webb C. The Delphi technique: a methodological discussion. J Adv Nurs 1994;19:180-6.
22. Anderson B. Reflection on practice: dietitian as partner or expert? Can J Diet Prac Res 1998;59:138-42.