Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis: An accurate tool to assess stent-graft migration

Journal of Endovascular Therapy

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 468-475

  Koning, Olivier H J ^a   Oudegeest, Olivier R ^b   Valstar, Edward R ^a,c   Garling, Eric H ^a   Van Der Linden, Edwin ^a   Hinnen, Jan Willem ^a   Hamming, Jaap F ^a   Vossepoel, Albert M ^b,d   Van Bockel, J Hajo ^b  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^d ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Endograft; Endovascular aneurysm repair; Experimental model; Migration; Observer variation; Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis; Stent graft

Indexed keywords

POLITEF; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE); TANTALUM;

AORTA GRAFT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; FEASIBILITY STUDY; IN VITRO STUDY; MEASUREMENT ERROR; MICROMANIPULATOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RENAL ARTERY; STENT; STEREOPHOTOGRAMMETRY; X RAY ANALYSIS;

AORTOGRAPHY; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; CALIBRATION; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FOREIGN-BODY MIGRATION; HUMANS; MODELS, ANATOMIC; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; SOFTWARE; STENTS;

EID: 33748859098     PISSN: 15266028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1583/06-1842MR.1     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. van Marrewijk CJ, Fransen G, Laheij RJ, et al. Is a type II endoleak after EVAR a harbinger of risk? Causes and outcome of open conversion and aneurysm rupture during follow-up. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;27:128-137.
2. Harris PL, Vallabhaneni SR, Desgranges P, et al. Incidence and risk factors of late rupture, conversion, and death after endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms: the EUROSTAR experience. J Vasc Surg. 2000;32:739-749.
3. Wolf YG, Hill BR, Lee WA, et al. Eccentric stent graft compression: an indicator of insecure proximal fixation of aortic stent graft. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33:481-487.
4. Prinssen M, Buskens E, Jong SECA de, et al. Cost-effectiveness of endovascular versus conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm repair at one year. Results of a randomized trial. In: Prinssen M, ed. DREAM. Oud-Beijerland, The Netherlands: As BV; 2005:89-103.
5. Verhoeven EL, Tielliu IF, Prins TR, et al. Frequency and outcome of re-interventions after endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;28:357-364.
6. Selvik G. Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. A method for the study of the kinematics of the skeletal system. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1989;232:1-51.
7. Karrholm J. Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. Review of orthopedic applications. Acta Orthop Scand. 1989;60:491-503.
8. Valstar ER, Vrooman HA, Toksvig-Larsen S, et al. Digital automated RSA compared to manually operated RSA. J Biomech. 2000;33:1593-1599.
9. Vrooman HA, Valstar ER, Brand GJ, et al. Fast and accurate automated measurements in digitized stereophotogrammetric radiographs. J Biomech. 1998;31:491-498.
10. Valstar ER, de Jong FW, Vrooman HA, et al. Model-based Roentgen stereophotogrammetry of orthopaedic implants. J Biomech. 2001;34:715-722.
11. Georg C, Welker V, Eidam H, et al. Aortic stent-graft movement detection using digital roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis on plane film radiographs-initial results of a phantom study. Rofo. 2005;177:321-325.
12. Martin CJ, Sutton DG, Workman A, et al. Protocol for measurement of patient entrance surface dose rates for fluoroscopic x-ray equipment. Br J Radiol. 1998;71:1283-1287.
13. Valstar ER. Digital roentgen stereophotogrammetry. Development, validation, and clinical application. Thesis, Leiden University. Den Haag, The Netherlands: Pasmans BV, 2001.
14. Vos AW, Wisselink W, Marcus JT, et al. Cine MRI assessment of aortic aneurysm dynamics before and after endovascular repair. J Endovasc Ther. 2003;10:433-439.
15. Verhagen HJ, Teutelink A, Olree M, et al. Dynamic CTA for cutting edge AAA imaging: insights into aortic distensibility and movement with possible consequences for endograft sizing and stent design [Abstract]. J Endovasc Ther. 2005;12(suppl 1):1-45.
16. Murphy M, Hodgson R, Harris PL, et al. Plain radiographic surveillance of abdominal aortic stent-grafts: the Liverpool/Perth protocol. J Endovasc Ther. 2003;10:911-912.
17. Hodgson R, McWilliams RG, Simpson A, et al. Migration versus apparent migration: importance of errors due to positioning variation in plain radiographic follow-up of aortic stent-grafts. J Endovasc Ther. 2003;10:902-910.
18. Flora HS, Woodhouse N, Robson S, et al. Micromovements at the aortic aneurysm neck measured during open surgery with close-range photogrammetry: implications for aortic endografts. J Endovasc Ther. 2001;8:511-520.