Determination of the high pressure elasticity of cobalt from measured interfacial acoustic wave velocities

Applied Physics Letters

Volumn 89, Issue 11, 2006, Pages

  Crowhurst, J C ^a,d   Antonangeli, D ^a,e   Brown, J M ^b   Goncharov, A F ^c   Farber, D L ^a   Aracne, C M ^a  

^a LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c GEOPHYSICAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^d EUROPEAN SYNCHROTRON RADIATION FACILITY   (France)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIFFRACTION DATA; ELASTIC TENSOR ELEMENTS; INELASTIC X-RAY SCATTERING; LIQUID HELIUM;

ACOUSTIC WAVE PROPAGATION; ACOUSTIC WAVES; COBALT; DATA ACQUISITION; ELASTICITY; HELIUM; HIGH PRESSURE EFFECTS; LIGHT SCATTERING; SINGLE CRYSTALS; TENSORS; X RAY ANALYSIS; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

ACOUSTIC WAVE VELOCITY;

EID: 33748849326     PISSN: 00036951     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.2220537     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. H. K. Mao, J. Xu, V. V. Struzhkin, J. Shu, R. J. Hemley, W. Sturhahn, M. Y. Hu, E. E. Alp, L. Vocadlo, D. Alfè, G. D. Price, M. J. Gillan, M. Schwoerer-Böhning, D. Häusermann, P. Eng, G. Shen, H. Giefers, R. Lübbers, and G. Wortmann, Science 292, 914 (2001);
2. H. Giefers, R. Lübbers, K. Rupprecht, G. Wortmann, D. Alfè, and A. I. Chumakov, High Press. Res. 22, 501 (2002).
3. G. Fiquet, J. Badro, F. Guyot, H. Requardt, and M. Krisch, Science 291, 468 (2001).
4. D. Antonangeli, F. Occelli, H. Requardt, J. Badro, G. Fiquet, and M. Krisch, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 225, 243 (2004);
5. D. Antonangeli, M. Krisch, G. Fiquet, J. Badro, D. L. Farber, A. Bossak, and S. Merkel, Phys. Rev. B 72, 134303 (2005).
6. D. Antonangeli, M. Krisch, G. Fiquet, D. Farber, C. Aracne, J. Badro, F. Occelli, and H. Requardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 215505 (2004).
7. S. Merkel, A. F. Goncharov, H.-K. Mao, P. Gillet, and R. J. Hemley, Science 288, 1626 (2000);
8. H. Olijnyk, A. P. Jephcoat, and K. Refson, Europhys. Lett. 53, 504 (2001).
9. A. F. Goncharov, J. C. Crowhurst, and J. M. Zaug, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 115502 (2004).
10. E. H. Abramson, J. M. Brown, and L. J. Slutsky, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 50, 279 (1999).
11. J. C. Crowhurst, E. H. Abramson, L. J. Slutsky, J. M. Brown, J. M. Zaug, and M. D. Harrell, Phys. Rev. B 64, 100103 (2001).
12. J. C. Crowhurst and J. M. Zaug, Phys. Rev. B 69, 052301 (2004).
13. A. A. Maznev, A. Akthakul, and K. A. Nelson, J. Appl. Phys. 86, 2818 (1999).
14. In our experiment the excitation and probe pulses were both of 100 ps duration. Wavelengths were 1064 and 532 nm, respectively. The repetition rate was 3.8 kHz.
15. The acoustic waves will in general encounter a heated material as they propagate through the thermal grating which persists for some time after they are launched. However, calculation based on the measured intensity of the laser pulses, the cobalt reflectivity and skin depth at the excitation wavelength, and the thermal diffusivity indicates that surface heating associated with the laser excitation has a negligible impact on measured surface velocities. We find that a layer of a material much thinner than the acoustic wavelength is heated by about 10°C during the experimental time interval of approximately 20 ns.
16. A. G. Every and G. A. D. Briggs, Phys. Rev. B 58, 1601 (1998).
17. H. Fujihisa and K. Takemura, Phys. Rev. B 54, 5 (1996).
18. R. Le Toullec, P. Loubeyre, and J. Pinceaux, Phys. Rev. B 40, 2368 (1989).
19. A. G. Every, K. Y. Kim, and A. A. Mazenev, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 1346 (1997).
20. D. L. Farber, D. Antonangeli, C. M. Aracne, and J. Benterou, High Press. Res. 26, 1 (2006).
21. H. J. McSkimin, J. Appl. Phys. 26, 406 (1955).
22. H. R. Schober and H. Dederichs, in Elastic Piezoelectric Pyroelectric Piezooptic Electrooptic Constants and Nonlinear Dielectric Susceptibilities of Crystals, Landolt-Börnstein, New Series, Group III, Vol. 11a (Springer, Berlin, 1979).
23. S. Yoo, H. Cynn, P. Söderlind, and V. Iota, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4132 (2000).
24. G. Steinle-Neumann, L. Stixrade, and R. E. Cohen, Phys. Rev. B 60, 791 (1999);
25. Phys. Rev. B 69, 219903(E) (2004).
26. 44 obtained directly at 1 bar is smaller than the value extrapolated from the fit to the high pressure data that is listed in Table I by approximately 4%. This may imply some difference in the crystallinity of the near-surface region (i.e., within approximately 2 μm of the surface, corresponding to the penetration depth of the acoustic wave) of the two separate crystals.
27. C.-S. Zha, H.-K. Mao, and R. J. Hemley, Phys. Rev. B 70, 174107 (2004).