Photoisomerization as a modulator of the DNA-cleaving efficiency of novel azo bispropargyl sulfones

Chemical Communications

Volumn , Issue 36, 2006, Pages 3818-3820

  Kar, Moumita ^a   Basak, Amit ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AZO BISPROPARGYL SULFONE DERIVATIVE; AZOBENZENE; MERCURY; SULFONE DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; DNA CLEAVAGE; IRRADIATION; ISOMER; ISOMERIZATION; THERMAL EXPOSURE;

EID: 33748809276     PISSN: 13597345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1039/b606653d     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. K. C. Nicolaou S. Wendeborn P. Maligres K. Isshiki N. Zein G. Ellestad Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1991 30 418
2. A. M. Maxam W. Gilbert Methods Enzymol. 1980 65 499
3. A. M. Maxam W. Gilbert Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1977 74 560
4. P. J. Garratt S. B. Neoh J. Org. Chem. 1979 44 2667
5. Y. S. P. Cheng P. J. Garratt S. B. Neoh V. H. Rumjanek Isr. J. Chem. 1985 26 101
6. S. Braverman Y. Duar D. Segev Tetrahedron Lett. 1979 3181
7. Y.-j. Xu M. S. DeMott J. T. Hwang M. M. Greenberg B. Demple DNA Repair 2003 2 175
8. A. Liptakova L. Svorenova J. Labuda Z. Durackova Conf. Coord. Chem. 1995 407
9. C. Richter J. W. Park B. N. Ames Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1988 85 6465
10. A. Basak U. K. Khamrai Tetrahedron Lett. 1995 36 7913
11. S. M. Kerwin Tetrahedron Lett. 1994 35 1023
12. W.-M. Dai K. C. Fong Tetrahedron Lett. 1995 36 5613
13. W.-M. Dai K. C. Fong H. Danjo S.-i. Nishimoto M. Solow W. L. Mak M. L. Yeung Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1996 6 1093
14. K.-i. Haruna H. Kanezaki K. Tanabe W.-M. Dai S.-i. Nishimoto Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006 14 4427
15. K.-i. Haruna K. Tanabe A. Ishii W.-M. Dai H. Hatta S.-i. Nishimoto Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003 11 5311
16. M. Kar A. Basak M. Bhattacharya Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005 15 5392
17. R. G. Jones R. G. Bergman J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972 94 660
18. R. G. Bergman Acc. Chem. Res. 1973 6 25
19. T. P. Lockhart R. G. Bergman J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981 103 4091
20. D. B. Dess J. C. Martin J. Org. Soc. 1983 48 4155
21. Y. Zafrani H. E. Gottlieb M. Sprecher S. Braverman J. Org. Chem. 2005 70 10166
22. The cleavage efficiency was approximately 2.5 times for the Z-isomer than that for the E-isomer. This was determined by checking the relative UV-absorbance of the bands at 280 nm. It is to be noted that the control DNA specimen is usually contaminated with some nicked form (form II)
23. J. Moan Q. Peng Anticancer Res. 2003 23 3591