General versus spinal anesthesia with different forms of sedation in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy: Results of a prospective, randomized study

International Journal of Urology

Volumn 13, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 1185-1190

  Salonia, Andrea ^a,b   Suardi, Nazareno ^a   Crescenti, Antonella ^a   Colombo, Renzo ^a   Rigatti, Patrizio ^a   Montorsi, Francesco ^a  

^a VITA SALUTE SAN RAFFAELE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b SAN RAFFAELE HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

General anesthesia; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Sedation; Spinal anesthesia

Indexed keywords

BUPIVACAINE; DIAZEPAM; FENTANYL; ISOFLURANE; MIDAZOLAM; OXYGEN; PROPOFOL; THIOPENTAL; VECURONIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLATULENCE; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOBILIZATION; MUSCLE RELAXATION; OXYGEN SATURATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; PULSE OXIMETRY; RANDOMIZATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SEDATION; SPINAL ANESTHESIA; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADENOCARCINOMA; AGED; ANESTHESIA RECOVERY PERIOD; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; ANESTHESIA, SPINAL; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; DIAZEPAM; HUMANS; HYPNOTICS AND SEDATIVES; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; MALE; MIDAZOLAM; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREANESTHETIC MEDICATION; PROPOFOL; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 33748808664     PISSN: 09198172     EISSN: 14422042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2006.01524.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Shir Y, Srinivasa NR, Frank SM. Intraoperative blood loss during radical retropubic prostatectomy: epidural versus general anesthesia. Urology 1995; 93: 49-56.
2. Salonia A, Crescenti A, Suardi N et al. General versus spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy: preliminary results of a randomised prospective study. Urology 2004; 64: 95-100.
3. Walsh PC. Anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED Jr, Wein AJ (ed.). Campbell's Urology, 8th edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, 2002; 3107-29.
4. DaPozzo LF, Colombo R, Montorsi F et al. An original balloon-expanding urethral suture guide for radical prostatectomy. Urology 1995; 46: 562-4.
5. Walsh PC. Radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer provides durable cancer control with excellent quality of life: a structured debate. J. Urol. 2000; 163: 1802-7.
6. Holmberg L, Bill-Axelson A, Helgesen F et al. A randomised trial comparing radical prostatectomy with watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002; 347: 781-9.
7. Sheikh K, Bullock C. Rise and fall of radical prostatectomy rates from 1989 to 1996. Urology 2002; 59: 378-82.
8. Lepor H, Nieder AM, Ferrandino MN. Intraoperative and postoperative complications of radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1000 cases. J. Urol. 2001; 166: 1729-33.
9. Greenblatt DJ, Sethy VH. Benzodiazepine concentrations in brain directly reflect receptor occupancy: studies of diazepam, lorazepam, and oxazepam. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 1990; 102: 373-8.
10. Herman RJ, Wilkinson GR. Disposition of diazepam in young and elderly subjects after acute and chronic dosing. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 1996; 42: 147-55.
11. Mould DR, DeFeo TM, Reele S et al. Simultaneous modeling of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of midazolam and diazepam. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 1995; 58: 35-43.
12. Schuttler J, Ihmsen H. Population pharmacokinetics of propofol: a multicenter study. Anesthesiology 2000; 92: 727-38.
13. Fairfield JE, Dritsas A, Beale RJ. Haemodynamic effects of propofol: induction with 2.5 mg kg-1. Br. J. Anaesth. 1991; 67: 618-20.
14. Angelini G, Ketzler JT, Coursin DB. Use of propofol and other nonbenzodiazepine sedatives in the intensive care unit. Crit. Care Clin. 2001; 17: 863-80.
15. Bryson HM, Fulton BR, Faulds D. Propofol. An update of its use in anaesthesia and conscious sedation. Drugs 1995; 50: 513-59.
16. Hartmann B, Junger A, Klasen J et al. The incidence and risk factors for hypotension after spinal anesthesia induction: an analysis with automated data collection. Anesth. Analg. 2002; 94: 1521-9.
17. Widman J, Hammarqvist F, Sellden E. Amino acid infusion induces thermogenesis and reduces blood loss during hip arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia. Anesth. Analg. 2002; 95: 1757-62.
18. Law NL, Ng KFJ, Irwin MG, Man JSF. Comparison of coagulation and blood loss during anaesthesia with inhaled isoflurane or intravenous propofol. Br. J. Anaesth. 2001; 86: 94-8.
19. Saito M, Terao Y, Fukusaki M et al. Sequential use of midazolam and propofol for long-term sedation in postoperative mechanically ventilated patients. Anesth. Analg. 2003; 96: 834-8.
20. Lee T, Ang SBL, Dambisya YM et al. The effect of propofol on human gastric and colonic muscle contractions. Anesth. Analg. 1999; 89: 1246-9.
21. Reveille RM, Goff JS, Hollstrom-Tarwater K. The effect of intravenous diazepam on esophageal motility in normal subjects. Dig. Dis. Sci. 1991; 36: 1046-9.
22. Castedal M, Bjornsson E, Abrahamsson H. Effects of midazolam on small bowel motility in humans. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2000; 14: 571-7.
23. Stevens RA, Mikat-Stevens M, Flanigan R et al. Does choice of anesthetic technique affect the recovery of bowel function after radical prostatectomy? Urology 1998; 52: 213-18.
24. Rahim SA, Panju A, Pai M, Ginsberg J. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in medical inpatients: a retrospective chart review. Thromb. Res. 2003; 111: 215-19.