Local influence diagnostics for quasi-likelihood and lognormal estimates of a biological reference point from some fish stock and recruitment models

Biometrics

Volumn 62, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 713-720

  Cadigan, N G ^a  

^a NORTHWEST ATLANTIC FISHERIES CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Case deletion diagnostics; Case weight influence; Limit reference points; Sensitivity analysis

Indexed keywords

FISHERIES; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; SPORTS;

CASE-DELETION DIAGNOSTICS; CASE-WEIGHT INFLUENCE; FISH STOCK; LIMIT REFERENCE POINT; LOCAL INFLUENCE; LOG-NORMAL; QUASI-LIKELIHOOD; REFERENCE POINTS; STOCK MODELS; STOCK SIZE;

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

BIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS; DATA ACQUISITION; ESTIMATION METHOD; FISH; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; LIMIT ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; RECRUITMENT; REFERENCE SAMPLE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STOCK ASSESSMENT;

ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEASUREMENT; PROBABILITY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

EID: 33748807070     PISSN: 0006341X     EISSN: 15410420     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00517.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Barrowman, N. and Myers, R. A. (2000). Still more spawner-recruit curves: The hockey stick and its generalizations. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 57, 665-676.
2. Beverton, R. J. H. and Holt, S. J. (1957). On the Dynamics of Exploited Fish Populations. London: Chapman and Hall.
3. Butterworth, D. S. and Bergh, M. O. (1993). The development of a management procedure for the South African anchovy resource. In Risk Evaluation and Biological Reference Points for Fisheries Management, S. J. Smith, J. J. Hunt, and D. Rivard (eds). Canadian Special Publication in Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 120, 83-99.
4. Cadigan, N. G. and Farrell, P. J. (2002). Generalized local influence with applications to fish stock cohort analysis. Applied Statistics 51, 469-483.
5. Cadigan, N. G. and Myers, R. A. (2001). A comparison of gamma and lognormal maximum likelihood estimators in a sequential population analysis. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58, 560-567.
6. Cook, R. D. (1986). Assessment of local influence. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 48, 133-169.
7. Cook, R. D. and Weisberg, S. (1982). Residuals and Influence in Regression. New York and London: Chapman and Hall.
8. Firth, D. (1988). Multiplicative errors: Log-normal or gamma? Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 50, 266-268.
9. Hinrichsen, R. A. (2001). The importance of influence diagnostics: Examples from Snake River chinook salmon spawner-recruit models. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58, 551-559.
10. Jiao, Y., Schneider, D., Chen, Y., and Wroblewski, J. (2004). A simulation study of impacts of error structure on modeling in stock-recruitment data using generalized linear models. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 61, 122-133.
11. McCullagh, P. and Nelder, J. A. (1989). Generalized Linear Models, 2nd edition. London: Chapman and Hall.
12. Morgan, M. J., Brodie, W. B., Maddock Parsons, D., and Healey, B. P. (2003). An assessment of American plaice in NAFO Divisions 3LNO. Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization Science Council Research Document 03/56.
13. Needle, C. L. (2002). Recruitment models: Diagnosis and prognosis. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 11, 95-111.
14. Ricker, W. E. (1954). Stock and recruitment. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 11, 559-623.
15. Shelton, P. A., Rice, J. C., and Cadigan, N. G. (2003). Elements of a precautionary risk-management framework for canadian cod stocks. DFO Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Research Document 2003/041.