Reactivity of the metal→BX3 dative σ-bond: 1,2-addition reactions of the Fe→BX3 moiety of the ferraboratrane complex [κ4-B(mimBut) 3]Fe(CO)2

Inorganic Chemistry

Volumn 45, Issue 18, 2006, Pages 7056-7058

  Figueroa, Joshua S ^a   Melnick, Jonathan G ^a   Parkin, Gerard ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BORON DERIVATIVE; IRON; LIGAND; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUND;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; CONFORMATION; SYNTHESIS; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

BORON COMPOUNDS; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; IRON; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS;

EID: 33748805466     PISSN: 00201669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ic061353n     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. For an account of the L, X, and Z classification of metal-ligand interactions, see: Green, M. L. H. J. Orqanomet. Chem. 1995, 500, 127-148.
2. For a discussion of the distinction between covalent and dative covalent bonds, see: Haaland, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1989, 28, 992-1007.
3. 6), but these are supplements to the dative M←L interactions.
4. 3 upon removal of the solvent. See: Scott, R. N.; Shriver, D. F.; Vaska, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 1079-1080.
5. 3 interactions have been shown to be either incorrect or called into question due to lack of structural characterization. See, for example: (a) Braunschweig, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1786-1801.
6. (b) Braunschweig, H.; Colling, M. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2001, 223, 1-51.
7. 3 (M = Al, Ga). See: Cowley, A. H. Chem. Commun. 2004, 2369-2375 and references therein.
8. (a) Hill, A. F.; Owen, G. R.; White, A. J. P.; Williams, D. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 2759-2761.
9. (b) Foreman, M. R. St.-J.; Hill, A. F.; Owen, G. R.; White, A. J. P.; Williams, D. J. Organometallics 2003, 22, 4446-4450.
10. t). See: (a) Cook, K. S.; Piers, W. E.; Woo, T. K.; McDonald, R. Organometallics 2001, 20, 3927-3937.
11. (b) Cook, K. S.; Piers, W. E.; Rettig, S. J. Organometallics 1999, 18, 1575-1577.
12. Crossley, I. R.; Hill, A. F.; Willis, A. C. Organometallics 2006, 25, 289-299 and references therein.
13. Mihalcik, D. J.; White, J. L.; Tanski, J. M.; Zakharov, L. N.; Yap, G. P. A.; Incarvito, C. D.; Rheingold, A. L.; Rabinovich, D. Dalton Trans. 2004, 1626-1634.
14. Landry, V. K.; Melnick, J. G.; Buccella, D.; Pang, K.; Ulichny, J. C.; Parkin, G. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 2588-2597.
15. Crossley, I. R.; Hill, A. F.; Willis, A. C. Organometallics 2005, 24, 1062-1064.
16. Bontemps, S.; Gornitzka, H.; Bouhadir, G.; Miqueu, K.; Bourissou, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1611-1614.
17. 3 (taz = 4-ethyl-3-methyl-5-thioxo-1,2,4-triazolyl), see: Blagg, R. J.; Charmant, J. P. H.; Connelly, N. G.; Haddow, M. F.; Orpen, A. G. Chem. Commun. 2006, 2350-2352.
18. For dinuclear compounds with bridging boryl ligands that feature a M→B component to the bonding, see: (a) Braunschweig, H.; Radacki, K.; Rais, D.; Whittell, G. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1192-1193.
19. (b) Westcott, S. A.; Marder, T. B.; Baker, R. T.; Harlow, R. L.; Calabrese, J. C.; Lam, K. C.; Lin, Z. Polyhedron 2004, 23, 2665-2677.
20. (c) Curtis, D.; Lesley, M. J. G.; Norman, N. C.; Orpen, A. G.; Starbuck, J. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1999, 1687-1694.
21. Kimblin, C.; Churchill, D. G.; Bridgewater, B. M.; Girard, J. N.; Quarless, D. A.; Parkin, G. Polyhedron 2001, 20, 1891-1896.
22. c (a) Gorrell, I. B.; Parkin, G. Inorg. Chem. 1990, 29, 2452-2456.
23. (b) Kisko, J. L.; Hascall, T.; Parkin, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 10561-10562.
24. (c) Betley, T. A.; Peters, J. C. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 5074-5084.
25. 2- dative bond, it must be emphasized that the Fe→B retrodative bond description provided here is in complete accord with Covalent Bond Classification method of ref 1.
26. For a discussion of the bonding in boratrane compounds, see ref 11.
27. For recent reviews of complexes with M-B bonds, see: (a) Irvine, G. J.; Lesley, M. J. G.; Marder, T. B.; Norman, N. C.; Rice, C. R.; Robins, E. G.; Roper, W. R.; Whittell, G.; Wright, L. J.Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 2685-2722.
28. (b) Braunschweig, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1786-1801.
29. (c) Braunschweig, H.; Colling, M. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2001, 223, 1-51.
30. (d) Aldridge, S.; Coombs, D. L. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2004, 248, 535-559.
31. Hartwig, J. F.; Huber, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 4908-4909.
32. Cowley, A. H.; Lomelí, V.; Voight, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6401-6402.
33. It is pertinent to note that Fe→B interactions have been considered to account for the displacement of boron from the cyclopentadienyl plane in ferrocenylboranes, but recent calculations suggest there is no direct bonding interaction. See: Scheibitz, M.; Bolte, M.; Bats, J. W.; Lerner, H.-W.; Nowik, I.; Herber, R. H.; Krapp, A.; Lein, M.; Holthausen, M. C.; Wagner, M. Chem. Eur. J. 2005, 11, 584-603.
34. 3. See: Hill, A. F.; Smith, M. K. Chem. Commun. 2005, 1920-1922.
35. For a recent discussion concerned with the influence of ligand substituents in tuning the electronic properties of pseudo-tetrahedral cobalt complexes, see: Jenkins, D. M.; Peters, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 7148-7165.
36. For example, as applied to synthetic analogues of zinc enzymes. See: Parkin, G. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 699-767 and references therein.