Uterine artery embolization versus hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids (EMMY trial)

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 195, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 1190-

  Katsumori, Tetsuya ^a   Kasahara, Toshiyuki ^b  

^a Medical Care Center   (Japan)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLOOD TRANSFUSION; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; LETTER; OUTPATIENT; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; UTERINE ARTERY EMBOLIZATION; UTERINE CERVIX; UTERUS MYOMA;

EMBOLIZATION, THERAPEUTIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; LEIOMYOMA; UTERINE NEOPLASMS; UTERUS;

EID: 33748790982     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.12.068     Document Type: Letter

References (2)

1. Hehenkamp W.J., Volkers N.A., Donderwinkel P.F., de Blok S., Birnie E., Ankum W.M., et al. Uterine artery embolization versus hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids (EMMY trial): peri- and postprocedural results from a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193 (2005) 1618-1629
2. Worthington-Kirsch R., Spies J.B., Myers E.R., Mulgund J., Mauro M., Pron G., et al. The Fibroid Registry for outcomes data (FIBROID) for uterine embolization: short-term outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 106 (2005) 52-59