Influence of lot size and shape on redevelopment projects

Land Use Policy

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 212-222

  Gao, Xiaolu ^a   Asami, Yasushi ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF GEOGRAPHIC SCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCES RESEARCH   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Externality; Hedonic; Lot shape; Lot size; Planning policy; Redevelopment

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENT PROJECT; HEDONIC ANALYSIS; REDEVELOPMENT; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN PLANNING; URBAN POLICY;

EID: 33748779610     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Asami Y. On the evaluation of residential lots: with a focus on their shape. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 22 (1995) 149-174
2. Asami Y. Evaluation of the shape of residential lots in land readjustment projects. Regional Science and Urban Economics 25 (1995) 483-503
3. Asami Y. The rationale and negative effects of detached houses built on small land lots in urban areas. Housing 49 11 (2000) 5-8 (in Japanese)
4. Belsley D.A. Conditioning Diagnostics, Collinearity and Weak Data in Regression (1991), Wiley, New York
5. Colwell P.F., and Scheu T. Optimal lot size and configuration. Journal of Urban Economics 26 (1989) 90-109
6. Galster G. William Grigsby and the analysis of housing sub-markets and filtering. Urban Studies 33 10 (1996) 1797-1805
7. Gao X., and Asami Y. The external effects of local attributes on living environment in detached housing blocks in Tokyo. Urban Studies 38 3 (2001) 487-505
8. Gao X., and Asami Y. Hedonic analysis of micro-scale residential environment. Journal of Property Assessment Policy 7 2 (2005) 30-35 (in Japanese)
9. Gao, X., Asami, Y., Chung, C.F., 2002. An empirical evaluation of hedonic regression models. In: Proceedings of ISPRS/SDH/CIG Joint International Symposium on Geospatial Theory, Processing and Applications, 2002, Ottawa, Canada.
10. Geoghegan J. The value of open spaces in residential land use. Land Use Policy 19 1 (2002) 91-98
11. Goodman A.C. Housing submarkets within urban areas: definitions and evidence. Journal of Regional Science 21 (1981) 175-185
12. Goodman A.C., and Thibodeau T.G. Housing market segmentation. Journal of Housing Economics 7 2 (1998) 121-143
13. Hatta T., and Akai N. Analysis on the Land and House Lease Law-with a fixed cost being considered. Housing Problem Studies 12 1 (1996) 2-8 (in Japanese)
14. Hidano N., Kameda M., and Ando S. Studies on the benefit and cost of a setback regulation. Proceedings of the Japanese Real Estate Institute 14 (1998) 125-128 (in Japanese)
15. Kain J.F., and Quigley J.M. Evaluating the quality of the residential environment. Environment and Planning A 2 (1970) 23-32
16. Lum S.K., Sim L.L., and Malone-Lee L.C. Market-led policy measures for urban redevelopment in Singapore. Land Use Policy 21 (2004) 1-19
17. Morancho A.B. A hedonic valuation of urban green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 66 (2003) 35-41
18. Pelzer, B., Grotenhuis, M., Lammers, J., Hendrickx, J., 2004. Perturb Macro. Retrieved on January 14, 2004 from http://www.xs4all.nl/~jhckx/spss/perturb/perturb.html
19. Shen G. Measuring accessibility of housing to public community facilities using geographical information systems. Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies 14 3 (2002) 235-255
20. Tabuchi T. Quantity premia in real property markets. Land Economics 72 2 (1996) 206-217
21. Tajima K. New estimates of the demand for urban green space: implications for valuing the environmental benefits of Boston's Big Dig project. Journal of Urban Affairs 25 5 (2003) 641-655
22. Tu Y. The local housing submarket structure and its properties. Urban Studies 34 2 (1997) 337-396