Use of (weighted) essentially non-oscillatory advection schemes in a mesoscale model

Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society

Volumn 132, Issue 618 A, 2006, Pages 1509-1526

  Schroeder, Guido ^a   Schlünzen, K Heinke ^a   Schimmel, Frank ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

ENO; Grid refinement; Momentum equations; Numerical schemes

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC DENSITY; ATMOSPHERIC MOVEMENTS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

ADVECTIVE FLUX; CENTERED DIFFERENCES; GRID REFINEMENT; MESH SIZE; MOMENTUM EQUATIONS; NUMERICAL SCHEMES; SHAPIRO FILTER; WEIGHTED ESSENTIALLY NON-OSCILLATORY ADVECTION SCHEME;

MASS TRANSFER;

ADVECTION; ATMOSPHERIC MODELING; MESOSCALE METEOROLOGY; NUMERICAL MODEL;

XENOX;

EID: 33748777389     PISSN: 00359009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1256/qj.04.191     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bott, A. 1989 A positive-definite advection scheme obtained by nonlinear renormalization of the advective fluxes. Mon. Weather Rev., 117, 1006-1015
2. Carpenter, R. L., Droegemeier, K. K., Woodward, P. R. and Hane, C. E. 1990 Application of the piecewise parabolic method (PPM) to meteorological modeling. Mon. Weather Rev., 118, 586-612
3. Easter, R. C. 1993 Two modified versions of Bott's positive-definite numerical advection scheme. Mon. Weather Rev., 121, 297-304
4. Garnier, E., Sagaut, P. and Deville, M. 2002 Large-eddy simulations of shock/homogene turbulence interaction. Comput. Fluids, 31, 245-268
5. Grell, G., Dudhia, J. and Stauffer, D. R. 1996 'A Description of the Fifth-Generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5)'. Tech. Rep. NCAR/ TN-398+STR, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA
6. Harten, A., Engquist, B., Osher, S. and Chakravarthy, S. R. 1987 Uniformly high order accurate essentially non-oscillatory schemes, III. J. Comput. Phys., 71, 231-303
7. Jiang, G.-S. and Shu, C.-W. 1996 Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes. J. Comput. Phys., 126, 202-228
8. Leonard, B. P., MacVean, M. K. and Lock, A. P. 1995 The flux integral method for multidimensional convection and diffusion. Appl. Math. Modelling, 19, 333-342
9. Liu, X.-D., Osher, S. and Chan, T. 1994 Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes. J. Comput. Phys., 115, 200-212
10. Long, R. R. 1953 Some aspects of the flow of stratified fluids. I: A theoretical investigation. Tellus, 5, 42-58
11. Lüpkes, C. and Schlünzen, K. H. 1996 Modelling the Arctic convective boundary-layer with different turbulence parameterizations. Boundary-Layer Meteorol., 79, 107-130
12. Mesinger, F. and Arakawa, A. 1976 Numerical methods used in atmospheric models. GARP Publication Series No. 14, WMO/ICSU Joint Organizing Committee, Geneva, Switzerland
13. Schimmel, F. 2002 'Development and testing of an atmospheric flow model employing adaptive numerical methods'. PhD thesis, Berichte aus dem Zentrum für Meeres- und Klimaforschung A36, Universität Hamburg, Germany
14. Schlünzen, K. H. 1990 Numerical studies on the inland penetration of sea breeze fronts at a coastline with tidally flooded mudflats. Beitr. Phys. Atmosph., 63, 243-256
15. Schumann, U., Hauf, T., Schmidt, H. and Volkert, H. 1987 A mesoscale model for the simulation of turbulence, clouds and flow over mountains: Formulation and validation examples. Beitr. Phys. Atmos., 60, 413-446
16. Shapiro, R. 1971 The use of linear filtering as a parameterization of atmospheric motion. J. Atmos. Sci., 28, 523-531
17. Shu, C.-W. 1999 High order ENO and WENO schemes for computational fluid dynamics. Pp. 439-582 in High-Order Methods for Computational Physics. (Eds.) T. J. Barth and H. Deconinck, Springer, New York
18. Skamarock, W. C. and Klemp, J. B. 1993 Adaptive grid refinement for two-dimensional and three-dimensional non-hydrostatic atmospheric flows. Mon. Weather Rev., 121, 788-804
19. Skamarock, W. C., Smolarkiewicz, P. K. and Klemp, J. B. 1997 Preconditioned conjugate-residual solvers for Helmholtz equations in non-hydrostatic models. Mon. Weather Rev., 125, 587-599
20. Smolarkiewicz, P., Grubišić, V. and Margolin, L. 1997 On forward-in-time differencing for fluids: Stopping criteria for iterative solutions of anelastic pressure equations. Mon. Weather Rev., 125, 647-654
21. Sokol, Z. 1999 Comparison of several numerical schemes applied to advection equations. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 125, 213-224
22. Staniforth, A. and Cote, J. 1991 Semi-Lagrangian integration schemes for atmospheric models - a review. Mon. Weather Rev., 119, 2206-2223
23. Steppeler, J., Doms, G., Schättler, U., Bitzer, H. W., Gassmann, A., Damrath, U. and Gregoric, G. 2003 Meso-gamma scale forecasts using the non-hydrostatic model LM. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 82, 75-96
24. Strang, G. 1968 On the construction and comparison of difference schemes. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 5, 506-517
25. Thuburn, J. 1996 Multidimensional flux-limited advection schemes. J. Comput. Phys., 123, 74-83
26. van der Vorst, H. 1992 Bi-CGSTAB: A fast and smoothly converging variant of Bi-CG for the solution of nonsymmetric linear systems. SIAM J. Sci. Statist. Comput., 13, 631-644
27. Xue, M., Droegemeier, K. K. and Wong, V. 2000 The Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS) - A multiscale nonhydrostatic atmospheric simulation and prediction tool. Part I: Model dynamics and verifications. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 75, 161-193
28. Zängl, G. 2002 An improved method for computing horizontal diffusion in a sigma-coordinate model and its application to simulations over mountainous topography. Mon. Weather Rev., 130, 1423-1432
29. Zhang, D. L., Chang, H. R., Seaman, N. L., Warner, T. T. and Fritsch, J. M. 1986 A two-way interactive nesting procedure with variable terrain resolution. Mon. Weather Rev., 114, 1330-1339