Sensitivity of adzuki bean (Vigna angularis) to preplant-incorporated herbicides

Weed Technology

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 897-901

  Soltani, Nader ^a   Shropshire, Christy ^a   Robinson, Darren E ^a   Sikkema, Peter H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

Adzuki bean, Vigna angularis.(Willd.) Ohwi and Ohashi 'Erimo'; Crop injury; Tolerance

Indexed keywords

CROP PRODUCTION; GROWTH RATE; HERBICIDE; INJURY; PESTICIDE RESISTANCE; WEED CONTROL;

CANADA; NORTH AMERICA; ONTARIO;

VIGNA ANGULARIS;

EID: 33748767158     PISSN: 0890037X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/WT-05-005R1.1     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Arnold, N. R., W. M. Murray, J. E. Gregory, and D. Smeal. 1993. Weed control in pinto beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) with imazethapyr combinations. Weed Technol. 7:361-364.
2. Bartlett, M. S. 1947. The use of transformations. Biometrics 3:39-52.
3. Bauer, T. A., K. A. Renner, D. Penner, and J. D. Kelly. 1995. Pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) varietal tolerance to imazethapyr. Weed Sci. 43:417-424.
4. Hang, A. N., D. C. McClary, G. C. Gilliland, and T. A. Lumpkin. 1993. Plant configuration and population effects on yield of azuki bean in Washington State. In J. Janick and J. E. Simon, eds. New Crops. New York: Wiley. Pp. 588-590.
5. Lumpkin, T. A., J. C. Konovsky, K. J. Larson, and D. C. McClary. 1993. Potential new specialty crops from Asia: Azuki bean, edamame soybean, and astragalus. In J. Janick and J. E. Simon, eds. New Crops. New York: Wiley. Pp. 45-51.
6. McGill, J. A., Jr. 1995. Michigan-Japan and azuki beans. Michigan Dry Bean Digest 19(3):4-7.
7. McClary, D. C., A. N. Hang, G. C. Gilliland, J. M. Babcock, T. A. Lumpkin, A. G. Ogg, and L. K. Tamgoshi. 1993. Herbicides for azuki production. in J. Janick and J. E. Simon, eds. New Crops. New York: Wiley. Pp. 590-594.
8. McClary, D. C., T. L. Raney, and T. A. Lumpkin. 1989. Japanese food marketing channels: a case study of azuki beans and azuki products. Pullman, WA: Washington State University IMPACT Center Rpt. 29.
9. [OMAF] Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food. 2004. Guide to weed control. Publication 75. Toronto, Canada: OMAF. 348 p.
10. Powell, G. E., C. L. Sprague, and K. A. Renner. 2004. Adzuki Bean: Weed Control and Production Issues. 59th North Central Weed Science Proceedings 59:32.
11. Rubatzky, V. E. and M. Yamaguchi. 1997. World Vegetables: Principles, Production, and Nutritive Values. 2nd ed. New York: Chapman & Hall.
12. Sacks, F. M. 1977. A literature review of Phaseolus angularis-the adzuki bean. Econ. Bot. 31:9-15.
13. [SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1999. The SAS System for Windows, Release 8.0. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 3884 p.
14. Sikkema, P., N. Soltani, C. Shropshire, and T. Cowan. 2004. Sensitivity of kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) to soil applications of 5-metolachlor and imazethapyr. Can. J. Plant Sci. 84:405-407.
15. th North Central Weed Science Proceedings 59:40.
16. Soltani, N., C. Shropshire, T. Cowan, and P. Sikkema. 2003. Tolerance of cranberry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) to soil applications of S-metolachlor and imazethapyr. Can. J. Plant Sci. 83:645-648.
17. Vencill, W. K. 2002. Herbicide Handbook. 8th ed. Lawrence, KS: Weed Sci. Soc. Am., 493 p.
18. Urwin, C. P., R. G. Wilson, and D. A. Mortensen. 1996. Responses of dry edible bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars to four herbicides. Weed Technol. 10:512-518.
19. Wilson, R. G. and S. D. Miller. 1991. Dry edible bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) responses to imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 5:22-26.