What counts as research? The implications for research governance in social care

International Journal of Social Research Methodology

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 317-330

  Boddy, Janet ^a   Boaz, Annette ^b,c   Lupton, Carol ^d   Pahl, Jan ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c Research Governance Framework

^d Policy Research Programme   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748761634     PISSN: 13645579     EISSN: 14645300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13645570600659508     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Association of Directors of Social Services. (2005). ADSS research group guidelines for people who want approval for a multi site social services research project. Association of Directors of Social Services. Retrieved April 13, 2005, from http://www.adss.org.uk/research/guidelines/guidelines.pdf
2. Bassi, L. L., Bertele, V., & Garattini, S. (2003). How can research ethics committees protect patients better? British Medical Journal, 326, 1199-1201.
3. Central Office for Research Ethics Committees. (2004). New operational procedures for NHS RECs. Guidance for applicants to Research Ethics Committees. London: Central Office for Research Ethics Committees.
4. Chief Medical Officer. (2000). An organisation with a memory. Report of an expert group on learning from adverse events in the NHS. London: The Stationery Office.
5. Culpepper, L., & Gilbert, T. T. (1999). Evidence and primary care: Evidence and ethics. The Lancet, 353, 829-831.
6. Department of Health. (2001). Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care. London: Department of Health. Retrieved November 17, 2004, from http://www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/01/47/57/04014757.pdf
7. Department of Health. (2004a). Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care. London: Department of Health.
8. Department of Health. (2004b). The Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care. Implementation plan for social care. London: Department of Health. Retrieved November 17, 2004, from http://www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/ 08/21/72/04082172.pdf
9. Fontaine, N., & Rosengren, B. (2001). Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use. Official Journal of the European Communities, L121, 34-44.
10. Fox, J., Murray C., & Warm, A. (2003). Conducting research using web-based questionnaires: practical, methodological, and ethical considerations. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6, 167-180.
11. Grayson, L., Boaz, A. & Long, A. (2004). Organising social care knowledge: In search of a'fit for purpose' classification. Journal of Integrated Care, 12(1), 42-48.
12. Hearnshaw, H. (2004). Comparison of requirements of research ethics committees in 11 European countries for a non-invasive interventional study. British Medical Journal, 328, 140-141.
13. Holloway, I. (2001). Ethical dilemmas in qualitative research. Psychology Review, 8, 28-31.
14. Lewis, G., Brown, N., Holland, S., & Webster, A. (2003). A review of ethics and social science research. Swindon: Economic and Social Science Research Council.
15. Ramcharan, P., & Cutliffe, J. R. (2001). Judging the ethics of qualitative research: Considering the 'ethics as process' model. Health and Social Care in the Community, 9, 358-366.
16. Richardson, J. C., & Godfrey, B. S. (2003). Towards ethical practice in the use of archived transcripted interviews. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 4, 347-355.
17. Smythe, W. E., & Murray, M. J. (2000). Owning the story: Ethical considerations in narrative research. Ethics and Behavior, 10, 311-336.
18. Stalker, K. (1998). Some ethical and methodological issues in research with people with learning difficulties. Disability and Society, 13, 5-19.
19. Thomas, N., & O'Kane, C. (1998). The ethics of participatory research with children. Children and Society, 12, 336-348.
20. Tinker, A., & Coomber, V. (2004). University Research Ethics Committees: Their role, remit and conduct. Unpublished report, King's College, London.