Microwave irradiation affects gene expression in plants

Plant Signaling and Behavior

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 67-69

  Vian, A ^a   Roux, D ^a   Girard, S ^b   Bonnet, P ^b   Paladian, F ^b   Davies, E ^c   Ledoigt, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CLERMONT AUVERGNE   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

bZIP; EMF; Microwave; MSRC; Non ionizing radiation; Tomato

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748754135     PISSN: 15592316     EISSN: 15592324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/psb.1.2.2434     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. De Seze R, Fabro-Peray P, Miro L. GSM radiocellular telephones do not disturb the secretion of antepituitary hormones in humans. Bioelectromagnetics 1998; 19:271-8.
2. Hietanen M, Hämäläinen AM, Husman T. Hypersensitivity symptoms associated with exposure to cellular telephones: No causal link. Bioelectromagnetics 2002; 23:264-70.
3. Nikoloski N, Fröhlich J, Samaras T, Schuderer J, Kuster N. Reevaluation and improved design of the TEM cell in vitro exposure unit for replication studies. Bioelectromagnetics 2005; 26:215-24.
4. Laval L, Leveque P, Jecko B. A new in vitro exposure device for the mobile frequency of 900 MHz. Bioelectromagnetics 2000; 21:255-63.
5. Rao RR, Kisaalita WS. A single magnetic field exposure system for sequential investigation of real time and downstream cellular responses. Bioelectromagnetics 2004; 25:27-32.
6. Besset A, Espa F, Dauvilliers Y, Billard M, De Seze R. No effect on cognitive function from daily mobile phone use. Bioelectromagnetics 2005; 26:102-8.
7. Sienkiewicz ZJ, Blackwell RP, Haylock RGE, Saunders RD, Cobb BL. Low-level exposure to pulsed 900 Mhz microwave radiation does not cause deficits in the performances of a spacial learning task in mice. Bioelectromagnetics 2000; 21:151-8.
8. De Mattei M, Gagliano N, Moscheni C, Dellavia C, Calastrini C, Pellati A, Gioia M, Caruso A, Stabellini G. Changes in polyamines, v-myc and c-fos gene expression in osteoblast-like cells exposed to pulsed electromagnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics 2005; 26:207-14.
9. Depège N, Thonat C, Coutand C, Julien JL, Boyer N. Morphological responses and molecular modifications in tomato plants after mechanical stimulation. Plant Cell Physiol 1997; 38:1127-34.
10. Verdus MC, Thellier M, Ripoll C. Storage of environmental signals in flax: Their morphogenetic effect as enabled by a transient depletion of calcium. Plant J 1997; 12:1399-1410.
11. Vian A, Henry-Vian C, Davies E. Rapid and systemic accumulation of chloroplast mRNA binding protein transcripts after flame stimulus in tomato. Plant Physiol 1999; 121:517-24.
12. Tafforeau M, Verdus MC, Charlionet R, Cabin-Flaman A, Ripoll C. Two-dimensional electrophoresis investigation of short term response of flax seedlings to cold shock. Electrophoresis 2002; 23:2534-40.
13. Tafforeau M, Verdus MC, Norris V, White G, Demarty M, Thellier M, Ripoll C. SIMS study of the calcium-deprivation step related to epidermal meristem production induced in flax by cold shock or radiation from a GSM telephone. J Trace Microprobe Techn 2002b; 20:611-23.
14. Tafforeau M, Verdus MC, Norris V, White GJ, Cole M, Demarty M, Thellier M, Ripoll C. Plant sensitivity to low intensity 105 GHz electromagnetic radiation. Bioelectromagnetics 2004; 25:403-7.
15. Tafforeau M, Verdus MC, Norris V, Ripoll C, Thellier M. Memory processes in the response of plants to environmental signals. Plant Sign Behav 2006; 1:9-14.
16. Vian A, Henry-Vian C, Schantz R, Ledoigt G, Frachisse JM, Desbiez MO, Julien JL. Is membrane potential involved in calmodulin gene expression after external stimulation in plants? FEBS Lett 1996; 380:93-6.
17. Stankovic B, Vian A, Henry-Vian C, Davies E. Molecular cloning and characterization of a tomato cDNA encoding a systematically wound-inducible bZIP DNA-Binding protein. Planta 2000; 212:60-6.
18. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-delta delta C(T)). Methods 2001; 25:402-8.
19. IEC: International Electrotechnical Commission. Electromagnetic compatibility. 2002, (Part 4 Section 21, Reverberation Chamber Test Methods, Standard IEC 61000-4-21, Draft CD2).
20. Challis LJ. Mechanisms for interaction between RF fields and biological tissues. Bioelectromagnetics supp 2005; 26:S98-106.
21. Blank M, Goodman R. A biological guide for electromagnetic safety: The stress response. Bioelectromagnetics 2004; 25:642-6.