Divisions of labour: The analysis of parentheticals

Lingua

Volumn 116, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1670-1687

  Blakemore, Diane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

'Comma' intonation; Adverbial; Conventional implicature; Grammar pragmatics distinction; Parenthetical; Radical orphanage; Relevance

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748750086     PISSN: 00243841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2005.04.007     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Arnold, D., 2004. Non-restrictive relatives are not orphans. Paper delivered at the Linguistics Association of Great Britain. University of Surrey.
2. Asher N. Truth and discourse semantics for parentheticals. Journal of Semantics 17 (2000) 31-51
3. Blakemore D. Semantic Constraints on Relevance (1987), Blackwell, Oxford
4. Blakemore D. Performatives and parentheticals. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 91 (1990) 197-213
5. Blakemore D. Understanding Utterances (1992), Blackwell, Oxford
6. Blakemore D. Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: the semantics and pragmatics of discourse markers (2002), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
7. Blakemore D. and-parentheticals. Journal of Pragmatics 37 (2005) 1165-1181
8. Blass R. Relevance Relations in Discourse (1990), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
9. Bolinger D. Intonation and its Uses (1989), Stanford University Press, Stanford
10. Burton-Roberts N. Language, linear precedence and parentheticals. In: Collins P., and Lee D. (Eds). The Clause in English (1998), John Benjamins, Amsterdam 33-52
11. Burton-Roberts N. Parentheticals. In: Brown E.K. (Ed). Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics (2005), Elsevier, Amsterdam
12. Carston R. Thoughts and Utterances: the pragmatics of explicit communication (2002), Blackwell, Oxford
13. Culicover P., and Jackendoff R. Syntax Made Simple (2005), Oxford University Press, Oxford
14. Emonds J. Appositive relatives have no properties. Linguistic Inquiry 10 (1979) 211-243
15. Espinal T. The representation of disjunct constituents. Language 67 4 (1991) 726-762
16. Fabb N. The difference between English restrictive and non-restrictive relative clauses. Journal of Linguistics 26 (1990) 57-78
17. Ginzburg J., and Sag I. Interrogative Investigations: the Form, Meaning and use of English Interrogatives (2000), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
18. Haegeman L. Parenthetical adverbials: the radical orphanage approach. In: Chiba S. (Ed). Aspects of Modern English Linguistics (1988), Kaitakushi, Tokyo 232-254
19. Hobbs J. Coherence and coreference. Cognitive Science 3 (1979) 67-90
20. Hand M. Parataxis and parentheticals. Linguistics and Philosophy 16 (1993) 495-507
21. Ifantidou-Trouki E. Sentential adverbs and relevance. Lingua 90 (1993) 69-90
22. Ifantidou E. Evidentials and Relevance (2001), John Benjamins, Amsterdam
23. Kamp H., and Reyle U. From Discourse to Logic (1993), Kluwer, Dordrecht
24. Kaplan D. Demonstratives. In: Almog J., et al. (Eds). Themes from Kaplan (1989), Oxford University Press, New York 481-614
25. Kempson R. Definite NPs and context dependence: a unified theory of anaphora. In: Meyers T. (Ed). Reasoning and Discourse Processes (1986), Academic Press, New York
26. Levinson S. Presumptive Meanings; the theory of generalized conversational implicature (2000), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
27. Lewis D. General semantics. In: Davidson D., and Harman G. (Eds). Semantics of Natural Language (1972), Reidel, Dordrecht 169-218
28. Lewis D. Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1979) 359-459
29. Potts C. The syntax and semantics of as-parentheticals. NLLT 20 (2002) 623-689
30. Potts C. Conventional implicatures, a distinguished class of meanings. In: Ramchand G., and Reiss C. (Eds). The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces (2003), Oxford University Press, Oxford
31. Potts C. The Logic of Conventional Implicatures (2005), Oxford University Press, Oxford
32. Quirk R., et al. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language (1985), Longman, Essex
33. Ross J.R. Inner islands. In: Brugman C., and MacCaulay M. (Eds). Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of the Berkley Linguistics Society. University of California (1984) 258-265
34. Safir K. Relative clauses in a theory of binding and levels. Linguistic Inquiry 17 4 (1986) 663-689
35. Sag I. English relative clause constructions. Journal of Linguistics 33 (1997) 431-483
36. Sperber D., and Wilson D. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. second ed. (1995), Blackwell, Oxford
37. Taglicht J. Constraints on intonational phrasing in English. Journal of Linguistics 34 (1998) 181-211
38. Urmson J.O. Parenthetical verbs. In: Flew A. (Ed). Essays in Conceptual Analysis (1960), MacMillan, London 192-212
39. de Vries M. The Syntax of Relativization (2002), ACLC LOT. Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics
40. Wichmann A. Spoken parentheticals. In: Aijmer K. (Ed). A Wealth of English (2001), Gothenburg University Press, Gothenburg 171-193
41. Wilson D., and Sperber D. Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua 90 (1993) 1-25