Creating a consensus ranking of proposals from reviewers' partial ordinal rankings

Computers and Operations Research

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 954-965

  Cook, Wade D ^a   Golany, Boaz ^b   Penn, Michal ^b   Raviv, Tal ^c  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Branch and bound algorithms; Peer review

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT;

AGGREGATE RANKING; BRANCH-AND-BOUND ALGORITHMS; PEER REVIEW;

OPERATIONS RESEARCH;

EID: 33748745383     PISSN: 03050548     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2005.05.030     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Cardus D., Fuhrer M.J., Martin A.W., and Thrall R.M. Use of benefit-cost-analysis in the peer-review of proposed research. Management Science 28 4 (1982) 439-445
2. Hall N.G., Hershey J.C., Kessler L.G., and Stotts R.C. A model for making project funding decisions at the national cancer institute. Operations Research 40 6 (1992) 1040-1052
3. Cook WD, Golany B, Kress M, Penn M, Raviv T. Optimal allocation of proposals to reviewers to facilitate effective ranking. Management Science, forthcoming, 2005.
4. Cook W.D., and Seiford L.M. Priority ranking and consensus formation. Management Science 24 16 (1978) 1721-1732
5. Cook W.D., and Kress M. Ordinal information and preference structures: decision models and applications (1991), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
6. Beg M.M.S., and Ahmed N. Soft computing techniques for rank aggregation on the world wide web. World Wide Web: Internet and Web Information Systems 6 (2003) 5-22
7. Kemeny J.G., and Snell L.J. Preference ranking: an axiomatic approach. Mathematical models in the social science (1962), Ginn, Boston 9-23
8. Bogart K.P. Preference structures II: distances between asymmetric relations. SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics 29 2 (1975) 254-262
9. Kirkwood C.W., and Sarin R.K. Ranking with partial information-a method and an application. Operations Research 33 1 (1985) 38-48
10. Roubens M. Preference relations on actions and criteria in multi-criteria decision making. European Journal of Operational Research 10 (1982) 51-55
11. Ali I., Cook W.D., and Kress M. On the minimum violations ranking of a tournament. Management Science 32 6 (1986) 660-672
12. Cook W.D., and Kress M. An mth generation model for weak ranking of players in a tournament. Journal of the Operational Research Society 41 12 (1990) 1111-1119
13. Golany B., and Kress M. A multi-criteria evaluation of methods for obtaining weights from ratio-scale matrices. European Journal of Operational Research 69 2 (1993) 210-220
14. Kendall M. Rank correlation methods. 3rd ed. (1962), Hafner, New York
15. Borda JC. Memoir sur les elections au scrutin. Histoire de l'Academie Royale des Sciences, 1781.
16. Cook W.D., and Seiford L.M. The Borda-Kendall consensus method for priority ranking problems. Management Science 28 6 (1982) 621-637
17. Isaak G., and Narayan D.A. A classification of tournaments having an acyclic tournament as a minimum feedback arc set. Information Processing Letters 92 3 (2004) 107-111
18. Mehlhorn K., and Näher S. Leda-a platform for combinatorial optimization and geometric computing (1999), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge