The effect of format and experience on internal control evaluation

Managerial Auditing Journal

Volumn 21, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 877-891

  Lloyd Bierstaker, James ^a   Thibodeau, Jay C ^b  

^a VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BENTLEY COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditors; Internal control; Questionnaires

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748743542     PISSN: 02686902     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/02686900610704984     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants 1995, Consideration of the Internal Control Structure in a Financial Statement Audit: An Amendment to SAS No. 55, AICPA, New York, NY.
2. Anderson, J.R.1990, Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications, 3rd ed., W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, NY.
3. Asare, S. and Wright, A.2004, ‘The effectiveness of alternative risk assessment and program planning tools in a fraud setting’, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 21, pp. 325-51.
4. Bedard, J.C. and Graham, L.E.1994, ‘Auditors' knowledge organization: observations form audit practice and their implications’, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 13, pp. 73-83.
5. Bedard, J.C. and Graham, L.E.2002, ‘The effects of decision aid orientation on risk factor identification and audit test planning’, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, pp. 39-56, September.
6. Bedard, J. and Chi, M.1993, ‘Expertise in auditing’, Auditing: A Journal of Practice ' Theory, Supplement, pp. 21-45.
7. Bierstaker, J.L.1999, ‘Internal control documentation: which format is preferred?’, The Auditor's Report, Winter, pp. 12-13.
8. Bierstaker, J.L.2003, ‘Auditor recall and evaluation of internal control information: does task-specific knowledge mitigate part-list interference’, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 18, pp. 90-99.
9. Bierstaker, J.L. and Wright, S.2001, ‘A research note concerning practical problem-solving ability as a predictor of performance in auditing tasks’, Behavioral Research in Accounting, Vol. 13, pp. 49-62.
10. Bierstaker, J.L. and Wright, S.2004, ‘Does the adoption of a business risk audit approach change internal control documentation and testing practices?’, International Auditing Journal, Vol. 8, pp. 67-78.
11. Bierstaker, J.L., Bedard, J.C. and Biggs, S.F.1999, ‘The role of problem representation shifts on auditor decision processes in analytical procedures’, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Spring, pp. 18-36.
12. Biggs, S.F. and Mock, T.J.1983, ‘An investigation of auditor decision processes in the evaluation of internal controls and audit scope decisions’, Journal of Accounting Research, pp. 234-55.
13. Biggs, S.F., Messier, W.F. Jr and Hansen, J.V.1987, ‘A descriptive analysis of computer audit specialists' decision-making behavior in advanced computer environments’, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, pp. 1-21.
14. Biggs, S.F., Mock, T.J. and Watkins, P.R.1988, ‘Auditors' use of analytical review in audit program design’, Accounting Review, pp. 148-61.
15. Birnberg, J. and Shields, M.1984, ‘The role of attention and memory in accounting decisions’, Accounting, Organizations, and Society, Vol. 9, pp. 365-82.
16. Bonner, S.E.1990, ‘Experience effects in auditing: the role of task-specific knowledge’, The Accounting Review, pp. 72-92.
17. Bonner, S.E. and Lewis, B.L.1990, ‘Determinants of auditor expertise’, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 28, pp. 1-20.
18. Bonner, S.E. and Pennington, N.1991, ‘Cognitive processes and knowledge as determinants of auditor expertise’, Journal of Accounting Literature, Vol. 10, pp. 1-50.
19. Bonner, S.E. and Walker, P.1994, ‘The effects of instruction and experience on the acquisition of auditing knowledge’, The Accounting Review, Vol. 69, pp. 157-78.
20. Boritz, E.F.1985, ‘The effect of information presentation structures on audit planning and review judgments’, Contemporary Accounting Research, pp. 193-218.
21. Chi, M., Glaser, R. and Rees, E.1982, ‘Expertise in problem solving’, in Ed. Sternberg, R.Ed., Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp. 7-75.
22. Christ, M.1993, ‘Evidence on the nature of audit planning problem representations: an examination of auditor free recalls’, The Accounting Review, Vol. 68, pp. 304-22.
23. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway CommissionCOSO 1992, Internal Control-Integrated Framework, AICPA, New York, NY.
24. Davis, J.T.1996, ‘Experience and auditors' selection of relevant information for preliminary control risk assessments’, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Spring, pp. 16-37.
25. Davis, J. and Solomon, I.1989, ‘Experience, expertise, and expert performance research in public accounting’, Journal of Accounting Literature, Vol. 8, pp. 150-64.
26. Financial Executives International 2005, ‘Impact of Sarbanes-Oxley Act’, available at: www.fei.org/news/sox42105.cfm
27. Frase, L.T.1975, ‘Prose processing’, in Ed. Bower, G.H.Ed., Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 9, Academic Press, New York, NY.
28. Frase, L.T. and Schwartz, B.J.1975, ‘Effect of question production and answering on prose recall’, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 67, October, pp. 628-35.
29. International Federation of Accountants 2003, Handbook of International Auditing, Assurance and Ethics Pronouncements, IFA, New York, NY.
30. Kopp, L. and Bierstaker, J.L.2006, ‘Auditors' memory of internal control information: the effect of documentation preparation versus review’, Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research, Vol. 9, pp. 27-52.
31. Louwers, T., Ramsey, R., Sinason, D. and Strawser, J. 2005, Auditing ' Assurance Services, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
32. Messier, W.F.1995, ‘Research in and development of audit decision aids’, in Ed. Ashton, R.H. and Ed. Ashton, A.H.Eds, Judgment and Decision-Making in Accounting and Auditing, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
33. Mock, T. and Turner, J.L.1981, Internal Accounting Control Evaluation and Auditor Judgment, Audit Research Monograph No. 3., AICPA, New York, NY.
34. Newell, A. and Simon, H.1972, Human Problem Solving, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
35. Palmere, M., Benton, S.L., Glover, J.A. and Ronning, R.R.1983, ‘Elaboration and reca ll of main ideas in prose’, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 75, pp. 898-907.
36. PCAOB 2004, An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Performed In Conjunction With An Audit Of Financial Statements, Release No. 2004-001, March 9.
37. PCAOB 2005, PCAOB Issues Guidance on Audits of Internal Control, available at: www.pcaob.com/NewsandEvents/News/2005/05-16.asp
38. Pincus, K.V.1989, ‘The efficacy of a red flags questionnaire for assessing the possibility of fraud’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 14, pp. 153-63.
39. Plumlee, R.D.1985, ‘The standard of objectivity for internal auditors: memory and bias effects’, Journal of Accounting Research, pp. 683-99.
40. Purvis, S.E.C.1989, ‘The effect of audit documentation format on data collection’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, pp. 551-63.
41. Reason, T. 2005, ‘Is Sarbanes-Oxley worth the cost?’, CFO Magazine, pp. 1-8, May.
42. Reisbeck, C. and Schank, R.1989, Inside Case-Based Reasoning, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
43. Reynolds, R.E. and Anderson, R.C.1982, ‘Influence of questions on the allocation of attention during reading’, Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 74, pp. 623-32.
44. Rumelhart, D.1984, ‘Schemata and the cognitive system’, in Ed. Wyer, R.S. and Ed. Srull, T.K.Eds, Handbook of Social Cognition, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
45. Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002, ‘HR 3763’, paper presented at United States Congress.
46. Schank, R. and Abelson, R.1977, Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
47. Thomas, E.L. and Robinson, H.A.1972, Improving Reading In Everyday Class: A Sourcebook For Teachers, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA.
48. Vera-Munoz, S.C., Kinney, W.R. and Bonner, S.E.2001, ‘The effects of domain experience and task presentation format on accountants' information relevance assurance’, The Accounting Review, pp. 405-30, July.
49. Waller, W. and Felix, W.1984, ‘The auditor and learning from experience: some conjectures’, Accounting, Organizations, and Society, Vol. 9, pp. 383-406.
50. Wilson, P. and Anderson, R.1986, ‘What they don't know will hurt them: the role of prior knowledge in comprehension’, in Ed. Orasano, J.Ed., Reading Comprehension: From Research to Practice, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
51. Winograd, B.N., Gerson, J,S. and Berlin, B.L.2000, ‘Berlin Audit practices of PricewaterhouseCoopers’, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, pp. 175-82, Fall.
52. Wright, A.1988, ‘The impact of prior working papers on auditor evidential planning judgments’, Accounting, Organizations ' Society, pp. 595-606.