Clinical outcomes with drug-eluting stents following atheroablation therapies

Journal of Invasive Cardiology

Volumn 18, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 393-396

  Rao, Sunil V ^a   Honeycutt, Emily ^b   Kandzari, David ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATHERECTOMY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG ELUTING STENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; LASER ANGIOPLASTY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VALIDATION STUDY;

AGED; ANGIOPLASTY, LASER; ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; ATHERECTOMY, CORONARY; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; DEATH, SUDDEN, CARDIAC; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; MYOCARDIAL REVASCULARIZATION; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33748741089     PISSN: 10423931     EISSN: 15572501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bittl JA, Chew DP, Topol EJ, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized trials of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus atherectomy, cutting balloon atherotomy, or laser angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:936-942.
2. Topol EJ, Leya F, Pinkerton CA, et al. A comparison of directional atherectomy with coronary angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. The CAVEAT Study Group. N Engl J Med 1993;329:221-227.
3. Moses JW, Carlier S, Moussa I. Lesion preparation prior to stenting. Rev Cardiovasc Med 2004;5(Suppl 2):S16-S21.
4. Harris PJ, Lee KL, Harrell Jr FE, et al. Outcome in medically treated coronary artery disease. Ischemic events: Nonfatal infarction and death. Circulation 1980;62:718-726.
5. Mark DB, Nelson CL, Califf RM, et al. Continuing evolution of therapy for coronary artery disease. Initial results from the era of coronary angioplasty. Circulation 1994;89:2015-2025.
6. Ellis SG, Vandormael MG, Cowley MJ, et al. Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease. Implications for patient selection. Multivessel Angioplasty Prognosis Study Group. Circulation 1990;82:1193-1202.
7. Mark DB, Nelson CL, Califf RM, et al. Continuing evolution of therapy for coronary artery disease. Initial results from the era of coronary angioplasty. Circulation 1994;89:2015-2025.
8. Moussa I, Di Mario C, Moses J, et al. Coronary stenting after rotational atherectomy in calcified and complex lesions. Angiographic and clinical follow-up results. Circulation 1997;96:128-136.
9. Moussa I, Moses J, Di Mario C, et al. Stenting after optimal lesion debulking (SOLD) registry. Angiographic and clinical outcome. Circulation 1998;98:1604-1609.
10. Hopp HW, Baer FM, Ozbek C, et al. A synergistic approach to optimal stenting: Directional coronary atherectomy prior to coronary artery stent implantation - The AtheroLink Registry. AtheroLink Study Group. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1853-1859.
11. Ahmed JM, Hong MK, Mehran R, et al. Comparison of debulking followed by stenting versus stenting alone for saphenous vein graft aortoostial lesions: Immediate and one-year clinical outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:1560-1568.
12. Stankovic G, Colombo A, Bersin R, et al. Comparison of directional coronary atherectomy and stenting versus stenting alone for the treatment of de novo and restenotic coronary artery narrowing. Am J Cardiol 2004;93:953-958.
13. Kim YH, Hong MK, Lee SW, et al. Randomized comparison of debulking followed by stenting versus stenting alone for ostial left anterior descending artery stenosis: Intravascular ultrasound guidance. Am Heart J 2004;148:663-669.
14. Peterson ED, Lansky AJ, Anstrom KJ, et al. Evolving trends in interventional device use and outcomes: Results from the National Cardiovascular Network Database. Am Heart J 2000;139:198-207.
15. Batchelor WB, Anstrom KJ, Muhlbaier LH, et al. Contemporary outcome trends in the elderly undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: Results in 7,472 octogenarians. National Cardiovascular Network Collaboration. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:723-730.