Human treadmill walking needs attention

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 3, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Regnaux, Jean Philippe ^a,b,c   Roberston, Johanna ^a,b   Smail, Djamel Ben ^a,b   Daniel, Olivier ^a,b   Bussel, Bernard ^a,b  

^a RAYMOND POINCARÉ HOSPITAL   (France)

^b ASSISTANCE PUBLIQUE HÔPITAUX DE PARIS   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; GAIT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LOCOMOTION; NECK; NORMAL HUMAN; PRESSURE TRANSDUCER; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION; SITTING; STEADY STATE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TREADMILL EXERCISE; WALKING;

EID: 33748714029     PISSN: 17430003     EISSN: 17430003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-3-19     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Van de Crommert HW, Mulder T, Duysens J: Neural control of locomotion: sensory control of the central pattern generator and its relation to treadmill training. Gait Posture 1998, 7:251-263.
2. Barbeau H: Locomotor training in neurorehabilitation: emerging rehabilitation concepts. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2003, 17:3-11. Review
3. Thomas SL, Gorassini MA: Increases in corticospinal tract function by treadmill training after incomplete spinal cord injury. J Neurophysiol 2005, 94:2844-55.
4. MacKay-Lyons M: Central pattern generation of locomotion: a review of the evidence. Physical Therapy 2002, 82:69-83. Review
5. Zehr EP, Duysens J: Regulation of arm and leg movement during human locomotion. Neuroscientist 2004, 10:347-61. Review
6. Barbeau H, Wainberg M, Finch L: Description and application of a system for locomotor rehabilitation. Med Biol Eng Comput 1987, 25:341-4.
7. Duysens J, Van de Crommert HW: Neural control of locomotion; The central pattern generator from cats to humans. Gait Posture 1998, 7:131-141.
8. Dietz V: Spinal cord pattern generators for locomotion. Clin Neurophysiol 2003, 114:1379-89. Review
9. Dobkin BH, Firestine A, West M, Saremi K, Woods R: Ankle dorsiflexion as an fMRI paradigm to assay motor control for walking during rehabilitation. Neuroimage 2004, 23:370-81.
10. Nielsen JB: How we walk: central control of muscle activity during human walking. Neuroscientist 2003, 9:195-204. Review
11. Canning CG, Ada L, Paul SS: Is automaticity of walking regained after stroke? Disabil Rehabil 2006, 28:97-102.
12. Abernethy B, Hanna A, Plooy A: The attentional demands of preferred and non-preferred gait patterns. Gait Posture 2002, 15:256-65.
13. Mulder T, Zijlstra W, Geurts A: Assessment of motor recovery and decline. Gait Posture 2002, 16:198-210. Review
14. Monno A, Temprado JJ, Zanone PG, Laurent M: The interplay of attention and bimanual coordination dynamics. Acta Psychol 2002, 110:187-211. Review
15. Vuillerme N, Nougier V: Attentional demand for regulating postural sway: the effect of expertise in gymnastics. Brain Res Bull 2004, 63:161-5.
16. Vuillerme N, Isableu B, Nougier V: Attentional demands associated with the use of a light fingertip touch for postural control during quiet standing. Exp Brain Res 2006, 169:232-6.
17. Woollacott M, Shumway-Cook A: Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research. Gait Posture 2002, 16:1-14. Review
18. Li KZ, Lindenberger U: Relations between aging sensory/sensorimotor and cognitive functions. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2002, 26:777-83. Review
19. Gage WH, Sleik RJ, Polych MA, McKenzie NC, Brown LA: The allocation of attention during locomotion is altered by anxiety. Exp Brain Res 2003, 150:385-94.
20. Li KZ, Lindenberger U, Freund AM, Baltes PB: Walking while memorizing: age-related differences in compensatory behavior. Psychol Sci 2001, 12:230-7.
21. Tsang PS, Velazquez VL, Vidulich MA: Viability of resource theories in explaining time-sharing performance. Acta Psychol 1996, 91:175-206.
22. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott M, Kerns KA, Baldwin M: The effects of two types of cognitive tasks on postural stability in older adults with and without a history of falls. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1997, 52:M232-40.
23. Kurosawa K: Effects of various walking speeds on probe reaction time during treadmill walking. Percept Mot Skills 1994, 78:768-70.
24. Lajoie Y, Teasdale N, Bard C, Fleury M: Attentional demands for static and dynamic equilibrium. Exp Brain Res 1993, 97:139-44.
25. Sparrow WA, Bradshaw EJ, Lamoureux E, Tirosh O: Ageing effects on the attention demands of walking. Hum Mov Sci 2002, 21:961-72.
26. Faulkner KA, Redfern MS, Rosano C, Landsittel DP, Studenski SA, Cauley JA, Zmuda JM, Simonsick EM, Kritchevsky SB, Newman AB: Reciprocal influence of concurrent walking and cognitive testing on performance in older adults. Gait Posture 2005 in press.
27. Yardley L, Gardner M, Leadbetter A, Lavie N: Effect of articulatory and mental tasks on postural control. Neuroreport 1999, 10:215-9.
28. Dault MC, Geurts AC, Mulder TW, Duysens J: Postural control and cognitive task performance in healthy participants while balancing on different support-surface configurations. Gait Posture 2001, 14:248-55.
29. Huys R, Daffertshofer A, Beek P, Sanderson D, Siegmund G: Locomotion-respiration coupling: an account of the underlying dynamics. J Appl Physiol 2004, 96:2341-2.
30. Abernethy B: Dual-task methodology and motor skills research: some applications and methodological constraints. J Hum Mov Studies 1988, 14:101-132.
31. Montgomery DC: Design and analysis experiments 5th edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 2001.
32. Pashler H: Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychol Bull 1994, 116:220-44.
33. Beauchet O, Dubost V, Herrmann FR, Kressig RW: Stride-to-stride variability while backward counting among healthy young adults. J Neuroengineering Rehabil 2005, 11:2-26.
34. Brauer SG, Broome A, Stone C, Clewett S, Herzig P: Simplest tasks have greatest dual task interference with balance in brain injured adults. Hum Mov Sci 2004, 23:489-502.
35. Yardley L, Gardner M, Bronstein A, Davies R, Buckwell D, Luxon L: Interference between postural control and mental task performance in patients with vestibular disorder and healthy controls. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001, 71:48-52.
36. Regnaux JP, David D, Daniel O, Smail DB, Combeaud M, Bussel B: Evidence for cognitive processes involved in the control of steady state of walking in healthy subjects and after cerebral damage. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2005, 19:125-32.
37. Collins DF, Cameron T, Gillard DM, Prochazka A: Muscular sense is attenuated when humans move. The Journal of Physiology 1998, 508:635-643.
38. Milne RJ, Aniss AM, Kay NE, Gandevia SC: Reduction in perceived intensity of cutaneous stimuli during movement: a quantitative study. Exp Brain Res 1988, 70:569-576.
39. Prochazka A: Sensorimotor gain control: A basic strategy of motor control systems? Progress in Neurobiology 1989, 33:281-307.
40. Pins D, Bonnet C: On the relation between stimulus intensity and processing time: Pieron's law and choice reaction time. Perception & psychophysics 1996, 85:390-400.
41. Pins D, Bonnet C: The Pieron function in the threshold region. Perception & psychophysics 2000, 62:127-36.
42. Marsh AP, Geel SE: The effect of age on the attentional demands of postural control. Gait Posture 2000, 12:105-13.
43. Kemper S, Herman RE, Lian CH: The costs of doing two things at once for young and older adults: talking while walking, finger tapping, and ignoring speech or noise. Psychol Aging 2003, 18:181-92.
44. Grabiner MD, Troy KL: Attention demanding tasks during treadmill walking reduce step width variability in young adults. J Neuroengineering Rehabil 2005, 8:2-25.