Project management offices: A case of knowledge-based archetypes

International Journal of Information Management

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 414-423

  Desouza, Kevin C ^a   Evaristo, J Roberto ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Governance; Knowledge management; Project management; Project Management Offices

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

GOVERNANCE; KNOWLEDGE ARCHETYPE PERSPECTIVES; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; PROJECT MANAGEMENT OFFICES (PMO);

KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS;

EID: 33748711099     PISSN: 02684012     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Collier B., De Marco T., and Fearey P. A defined process for project post mortem review. IEEE Software 4 13 (1996) 65-72
2. Desouza K., Dingsøyr T., and Awazu Y. Experiences with conducting project postmortems: Reports vs. stories. Software Process: Improvement and Practice 10 2 (2005) 203-215
3. Keil M., Mixon R., Saarinen T., and Tuunainen V.K. Understanding runaway IT projects: Results from an international research program based on escalation theory. Journal of Management Information Systems 11 3 (1995) 67-97
4. Keil M., and Robey D. Blowing the whistle on troubled software projects. Communications of the ACM 44 4 (2001) 87-93
5. Keil M., Tan B., Wei K.-K., Saarinen T., Tuunainen V., and Wassenaar A. A cross-cultural study on escalation of commitment behavior in software projects. MIS Quarterly 24 4 (2000) 299-325
6. Power M.J., Desouza K., and Bonifazi C. Developing superior outsourcing programs. IT Professional 7 4 (2005) 32-38