Why the Kantian ideal survives medical learning curves, and why it matters

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 32, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 511-512

  Brecher, Bob ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRIGHTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FREEDOM; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; LEARNING; LIFE EXPECTANCY; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MORALITY; PATERNALISM; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PHYSICIAN; POLITICS; SKILL; THINKING;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; ETHICAL THEORY; HUMANS; LEARNING; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; RISK;

EID: 33748710861     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2005.014704     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Le Morvan P, Stock B. Medical learning curves and the Kantian ideal. J Med Ethics 2005;31:513-18.
2. Kant I. Foundations of the metaphysics of morals [trans Beck LW]. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1959;54:4, 429.
3. Neumann M. Did Kant respect persons? Res Publica 2000;6:285-99 at 288.
4. Secker B. The appearance of Kant's deontology in contemporary Kantianism: concepts of patient autonomy in bioethics. J Med Philos 1999;24:43-56.
5. Kant I. Critique of practical reason [trans Beck LW]. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1956;89:5, 87.