Inheriting constraint in hybrid cognitive architectures: Applying the EASE architecture to performance and learning in a simplified air traffic control task

Modeling Human Behavior with Integrated Cognitive Architectures: Comparison, Evaluation, and Validation

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 237-304

  Chong, Ronald S ^a   Wray, Robert E ^b  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SOAR TECHNOLOGY INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748709919     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410613257     Document Type: Chapter

References (25)

1. Altmann, E. M., & John, B. E. (1999). Episodic indexing: A model of memory for attention events. Cognitive Science, 23(2), 117-156.
2. Anderson, J. R., & Betz, J. (2002). A hybrid model of categorization. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 629-647.
3. Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. (1998). Atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (1983). The psychology of human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Chong, R. S. (2003). The addition of an activation and decay mechanism to the Soar architecture. In the Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Cognitive Modeling, Bamberg, Germany.
6. Chong, R. S., & Laird, J. E. (1997). Identifying dual-task executive process knowledge using EPICSoar. Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Palo Alto, CA.
7. Chong, R. S., & Wray, R. E. (2003). RULEX-EM: Incorporating exemplars and memory effects in a hypothesis-testing model of category learning. In the Proceedings of the First European Cognitive Science Conference, Osnabrueck, Germany.
8. Erickson, M. A., & Kruschke, J. K. (1998). Rules and exemplars in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 107-140.
9. Estes, W. K. (2002). Traps in the route to models of memory and decision. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9(1), 3-25.
10. Fleetwood, M. D., & Byrne, M. D. (2002). Modeling icon search in ACT-R. Cognitive Systems Research, 3, 25-33.
11. Kieras, D. E., & Meyer, D. E. (1997). An overview of the EPIC architecture for cognition and performance with application to human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 12, 391-438.
12. Lewis, R. L., Huffman, S. B., John, B. E., Laird, J. E., Lehman, J. F., Newell, A., Rosenbloom, P. S., Simon, T., & Tessler, S. G. (1990). Soar as a unified theory of cognition: Spring 1990. Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Cambridge, MA.
13. Love, B. C., & Medin, D. L. (1998). SUSTAIN: A model of human category learning. Proceedings of the 15th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-98), Madison, WI.
14. Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997a). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychology Review, 104(1), 3-65.
15. Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997b). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychology Review, 104(4), 749-791.
16. Miller, C. S., & Laird, J. E. (1996). Accounting for graded performance within a discrete search framework. Cognitive Science, 20(4), 499-537.
17. Minda, J. P., & Smith, J. D. (2001). Prototypes in category learning: The effects of category size, category structure, and stimulus complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 775-799.
18. Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Nosofsky, R. M., Gluck, M. A., Palmeri, T. J., McKinley, S. C., & Glauthier, P. T. (1994). Comparing models of rule-based classification learning: A replication and extension of Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961). Memory & Cognition, 22, 352-369.
20. Nosofsky, R. M., Palmeri, T. J., & McKinley, S. C. (1994). Rules-plus-exception model of classification learning. Psychological Review, 101, 53-79.
21. Rosenbloom, P. S., Laird, J. E., & Newell, A. (1993). The Soar papers. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
22. Shepard, R. N., Hovland, C. I., & Jenkins, H. M. (1961). Learning and memorization of classifications. Psychological Monographs, 75(13, Whole No. 517).
23. Wray, R. E., & Chong, R. S. (2003). Quantitative explorations of category learning with symbolic concept acquisition. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Cognitive Modeling, Bamberg, Germany.
24. Wray, R. E., & Laird, J. E. (2003). Variability in human behavior modeling for military simulations. Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Behavioral Representation in Modeling and Simulation (BRIMS), Phoenix, AZ.
25. Young, R. M., & Lewis, R. L. (1999). The Soar cognitive architecture and human working memory. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 224-256). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.