Molecular phylogeny of the genus Stereocaulon (Stereocaulaceae, lichenized ascomycetes)

Mycological Research

Volumn 110, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 1080-1092

  Högnabba, Filip ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Ascomycota; Lecanoromycetes; Lichens; Muhria

Indexed keywords

FUNGAL DNA; RIBOSOMAL SPACER DNA; RNA 5.8S; TUBULIN;

DNA; FUNGUS; GENE EXPRESSION; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENY;

ARTICLE; ASCOMYCETES; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; LICHENS; MICROBIOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY;

ASCOMYCOTA; DNA, FUNGAL; DNA, RIBOSOMAL SPACER; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; LICHENS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 5.8S; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; TUBULIN;

ASCOMYCOTA; LECANOROMYCETES; MUHRIA; MUHRIA URCEOLATA; STEREOCAULACEAE; STEREOCAULON;

EID: 33748709892     PISSN: 09537562     EISSN: 14698102     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mycres.2006.04.013     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Bremer K. The limitations of amino acid sequences data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42 (1988) 795-803
2. Bremer K. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10 (1994) 295-304
3. Cameron S.L., Miller K.B., D'Haese C.A., Whiting M.F., and Barker S.C. Mitochondrial genome data alone are not enough to unambiguously resolve the relationships of Entognatha, Insecta and Crustacea sensu lato (Arthropoda). Cladistics 20 (2004) 534-557
4. Carlin G., and Carlin-Silväng U. De svenska Stereocaulon-arterna (påskrislavar). Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 76 (1982) 289-307
5. Dahl E. Studies on the macrolichen flora of Southwest Greenland. Meddelelser om Grønland 150 (1950) 1-176
6. Dodge C.W. A synopsis of Stereocaulon with notes on some exotic species. Annales de Cryptogamie Exotique 2 (1929) 93-153
7. Dombrovskaya A.V. Stereocaulon alpestre comb. nov. (lichenes, Stereocaulaceae). Botanicheskii Zhurnal 77 (1992) 98-99
8. Dombrovskaya A.V. Protodenudata Dombr. - subsection nova in genere Stereocaulon. Novosti Sistematiki Nizshikh Rastenii 30 (1995) 61-62
9. Dombrovskaya A.V. Rod Stereocaulon na territorii byvshego SSSR (1996), Mir i Semja-95, Sankt-Peterburg
10. Ekman S., and Tønsberg T. Most species of Lepraria and Leproloma form a monophyletic group closely related to Stereocaulon. Mycological Research 106 (2002) 1262-1276
11. In: Eriksson O.E. (Ed). Outline of Ascomycota - 2005. Myconet 11 (2005) 1-113
12. Fries Th.M. De Stereocaulis et Pilophoris commentatio (1857), Wahlström & co, Uppsala
13. Fries Th.M. Monographia Stereocaulorum et Pilophorum. Nova Acta Regiae Societatis Scientiarum Upsaliensis Seriei III 2 (1858) 307-380
14. Frost D.R., Rodriques M.T., Grant T., and Titus T.A. Phylogenetics of the lizard genus Tropidurus (Squamata: Tropiduridae: Tropidurinae): direct optimization, descriptive efficiency, and sensitivity analysis of congruence between molecular data and morphology. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 21 (2001) 352-371
15. Fryday A.M., and Coppins B.J. A new crustose Stereocaulon from the mountains of Scotland and Wales. Lichenologist 28 (1996) 513-519
16. Fryday A.M., and Glew K.A. Stereocaulon nivale, comb. nov. Yet Another crustose species in the genus. Bryologist 106 (2003) 565-568
17. Gardes M., and Bruns T.D. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes - application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Molecular Ecology 2 (1993) 113-118
18. Goloboff P.A. Analyzing large data sets in reasonable times: solutions for composite optima. Cladistics 15 (1999) 415-428
19. Grant T. Against sensitivity analysis in phylogenetic systematics. In: Muona J. (Ed). Abstracts of the 21st annual meeting of the Willi Hennig Society. Cladistics 19 (2003) 148-163
20. In: Greuter W., McNeill J., Barrie F.R., Burdet H.M., Demoulin V., Filgueiras T.S., Nicolson D.H., Silva P.C., Skog J.E., Trehane P., Turland N.J., and Hawksworth D.L. (Eds). International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Saint Louis Code) Adopted by the Sixteenth International Botanical Congress, St Louis, Missouri, July-August 1999 (2000), Koeltz Scientific Books, Königstein [Regnum Vegetabile No. 138]
21. Jahns H.M. Untersuchungen zur Entwicklungsgeschichten der Cladoniaceae unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Podetien Problems. Nova Hedwigia 20 (1970) 1-177
22. Janies M., and Wheeler W. POY Documentation and Command Summary, Update November 6, 2002 (2002), American Museum of Natural History, New York
23. Jeanmougin F., Thompson J.D., Gouy M., Higgins D.G., and Gibson T.J. Multiple sequence alignment with Clustal X. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 23 (1998) 403-405
24. Jørgensen P.M., and Jahns H.M. Muhria, a remarkable new lichen genus from Scandinavia. Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 44 (1987) 581-599
25. Kivistö L. Suomen tinajäkälät (Stereocaulon) ja niiden sekundaarikemia (1998), Helsingin Yliopisto, Helsinki
26. Kivistö L. Taxonomy of Stereocaulon paschale and allied species in Finland. Sauteria 9 (1998) 25-36
27. Kluge A.G. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Systematic Zoology 38 (1989) 7-25
28. Kluge A.G. Testability and the refutation and corroboration of cladistic hypotheses. Cladistics 13 (1997) 81-96
29. Kluge A.G. Total evidence or taxonomic congruence: cladistics or consensus classification. Cladistics 14 (1998) 151-158
30. Krog H., Østhagen H., and Tønsberg T. Lavflora. Norske busk og- bladlav (1994), Universitetsforlaget, Oslo
31. Lamb I.M. On the morphogy, phylogeny, and taxonomy of the lichen genus Stereocaulon. Canadian Journal of Botany 29 (1951) 522-584
32. Lamb I.M. A conspectus of the lichen genus Stereocaulon (Schreb.) Hoffm. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 43 (1977) 191-355
33. Lamb I.M. Keys to the species of the lichen genus Stereocaulon (Schreb.) Hoffm. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 44 (1978) 209-250
34. Lynge B. Lichens from the west and north coasts of Spitsbergen and the north-east land. I The macrolichens. Skrifter utgitt av det norske videnskaps-akademi i Oslo. Matematisk-naturvidenskaplige klasse 6 (1938) 1-136
35. Magnusson A.H. Studies on boreal Stereocaula. Göteborgs Kungliga Vetenskaps- och Vitterhets-samhälles Handlingar 30 (1926) 1-89
36. Myllys L., Högnabba F., Lohtander K., Thell A., Stenroos S., and Hyvönen J. Phylogenetic relationships of Stereocaulaceae based on simultaneous analysis of beta-tubulin, GAPDH and SSU rDNA sequences. Taxon 54 (2005) 605-618
37. Myllys L., Lohtander K., and Tehler A. β-tubulin, ITS and group I intron challenge the species pair concept in Physcia aipolia and P. caesia. Mycologia 93 (2001) 335-343
38. Nixon K.C. The parsimony ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. Cladistics 15 (1999) 407-414
39. Nylander W. Synopsis methodica Lichenum omnium hucusque cognitorum præmissa introductione lingua gallica tractata (1858-1860), I.L. Martinet, Paris
40. Poelt J. Das Kontzept der Artenpaare bei den Flechten. Vortrage aus dem Gesamtgebiet der Botanik, Neue Folge 4 (1970) 187-198
41. Poelt J. Die Taxonomische Behandlung von Artenpaaren bei den Flechten. Botaniska Notiser 125 (1972) 77-81
42. Printzen C., and Kantvilas G. Hertelidea, genus novum Stereocaulacearum (ascomycetes lichensiati). Bibliotheca Lichenologica 88 (2004) 539-553
43. Purvis O.W., and James P.W. Lichens of the Coniston copper mines. Lichenologist 17 (1985) 221-237
44. Riddle L.W. The North American species of Stereocaulon. Botanical Gazette 50 (1910) 285-304
45. Räsänen V. Das system der Flechten. Acta Botanica Fennica 33 (1943) 1-82
46. Santesson R., Moberg R., Nordin A., Tønsberg T., and Vitikainen O. Lichen-forming and Lichenicolous Fungi of Fennoscandia (2004), Museum of Evolution, Uppsala University, Uppsala
47. Schulmeister S., Wheeler W.C., and Carpenter J.M. Simultaneous analysis of the basal lineages of Hymenoptera (Insecta) using sensitivity analysis. Cladistics 18 (2002) 455-484
48. Sober E. Reconstructing the Past: Parsimony, Evolution, and Inference (1988), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
49. Stenroos S., and DePriest P. SSU rDNA phylogeny of cladoniiform lichens. American Journal of Botany 85 (1998) 1548-1559
50. Stenroos S., Hyvönen J., Myllys L., Thell A., and Ahti T. Phylogeny of the genus Cladonia s. lat. (Cladoniaceae, ascomycetes) inferred from molecular, morphological, and chemical data. Cladistics 18 (2002) 237-278
51. Stenroos S., Myllys L., Thell A., and Hyvönen J. Phylogenetic hypotheses: Cladoniaceae, Stereocaulaceae, Baeomycetaceae, and Icmadophilaceae revisited. Mycological Progress 1 (2002) 267-282
52. Tehler A. The species pair concepr in lichenology. Taxon 31 (1982) 708-717
53. Timdal E. Stereocaulon cumulatum comb. nov., another crustose species in the genus. Lichenologist 34 (2002) 7-11
54. Tuckerman M.A. Genera Lichenum: An Arrangement of the North American Lichens (1872), Journal Steam Press, Lewiston, Maine
55. Vainio E.A. Étude sur la Classification Naturelle et la Morpologie des Lichens du Brésil. Acta Societatis pro Fauna et Flora Fennica 7 (1890) (1): i-xxx, 1-247; (2): 1-256
56. Vainio E.A. Additamenta ad Lichenographiam Antillarium illustrandam. Annales academiae scientiarum fennicae. Ser. A. 6 (1915) 1-226
57. Vitikainen O., Ahti T., Kuusinen M., Lommi S., and Ulvinen T. Checklist of lichens and allied fungi of Finland. Norrlinia 6 (1997) 1-123
58. Wedin M., and Döring H. The phylogenetic relationship of the Sphaerophoraceae, Austropeltum, and Neophyllis (lichenized Ascomycota) inferred by SSU rDNA sequences. Mycological Research 103 (1999) 1131-1137
59. Wedin M., Döring H., and Ekman S. Molecular phylogeny of the lichen families Cladoniaceae, Sphaerophoraceae and Stereocaulaceae (Lecanorales, Ascomycotina). Lichenologist 32 (2000) 171-187
60. Wedin M., Döring H., and Mattsson J.-E. A multi-gene study of the phylogenetic relationships of the Parmeliaceae. Mycological Research 103 (1999) 1185-1192
61. Wedin M., Tehler A., and Gargas A. Phylogenetic relationships of Sphaerophoraceae (ascomycetes) inferred from SSU rDNA sequences. Plant Systematics and Evolution 209 (1998) 75-83
62. Wheeler W. Optimization alignment: the end of multiple sequence alignment in phylogenetics?. Cladistics 12 (1996) 1-9
63. Wheeler W. Heuristic reconstruction of hypothetical-ancestral DNA sequences: sequence alignment versus direct optimization. In: Scotland R., and Pennington R.T. (Eds). Homology and Systematics: Coding Characters for Phylogenetic Analysis. Systematic Association (2000), Taylor & Francis, London 106-113
64. Wheeler W. Homology and the optimization of DNA sequence data. Cladistics 17 (2001) S3-S11
65. Wheeler W., Gladstein D., and DeLaet J. POY, Phylogeny Reconstruction via Optimization of DNA and Other Data Version 3.0.11 (May 6 2003) (2003), American Museum of Natural History, New York. Available from ftp.amnh.org/pub/molecular
66. White T.J., Bruns T., Lee S.B., and Taylor J.W. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis M.A., Gelfand D.H., Sninsky J.J., and White T.J. (Eds). PCR Protocols: a Guide to Methods and Application (1990), Academic Press, San Diego 315-322
67. Wiley E.O. An annotated Linnean hierarchy, with comments on natural taxa and competing systems. Systematic Zoology 28 (1979) 308-337