Homonymous hemianopia in stroke

Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 180-183

  Zhang, Xiaojun ^a   Kedar, Sachin ^a   Lynn, Michael J ^b   Newman, Nancy J ^a   Biousse, Valérie ^a,c  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c EMORY EYE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BRAIN INFARCTION; BRAIN RADIOGRAPHY; BRAIN TUMOR; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEAD INJURY; HOMONYMOUS HEMIANOPIA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; NEUROSURGERY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; STROKE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HEMIANOPSIA; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL RECORDS; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 33748709468     PISSN: 10708022     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.wno.0000235587.41040.39     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Smith JL. Homonymous hemianopia: a review of one hundred cases. Am J Ophthalmol 1962;54:616-22.
2. Trobe JD, Lorber ML, Schlezinger NS. Isolated homonymous hemianopia: a review of 104 cases. Arch Ophthalmol 1973;89:377-81.
3. Fujino T, Kigazawa K, Yamada R. Homonymous hemianopia: a retrospective study of 140 cases. J Neuroophthalmol 1986;6:17-21.
4. Gilhotra JS, Mitchell P, Healey PR, et al. Homonymous visual field defects and stroke in an older population. Stroke 2002;33:2417-20.
5. Meijer R, Ihnenfeldt DS, van Limbeek J, et al. Prognostic factors in the subacute phase after stroke for the future residence after six months to one year. A systematic review of the literature. Clin Rehabil 2003;17:512-20.
6. Kaul SN, Boulay GHD, Kendall BE, et al. Relationship between visual field defect and arterial occlusion in the posterior cerebral circulation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1974;37:1022-30.
7. McAuley DL, Russell RW. Correlation of CAT scan and visual field defects in the vascular lesions of the posterior visual pathways. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1979;42:298-311.
8. Kattah JC, Dennis P, Kolsky M, et al. Computed tomography in patients with homonymous visual field defects - a clinico-radiologic correlation. Comp Tomogr 1981;5:301-12.
9. Messing B, Ganshirt H. Follow-up of visual field defects with vascular damage of the geniculostriate visual pathway. J Neuroophthalmol 1987;7:231-42.
10. Pessin MS, Lathi ES, Cohen MB, et al. Clinical features and mechanism of occipital infarction. Ann Neurol 1987;21:290-9.
11. Gray CS, French JM, Bates D, et al. Recovery of visual fields in acute stroke: homonymous hemianopia associated with adverse prognosis. Age Ageing 1989;18:419-21.
12. Tiel K, Kolmel HW. Patterns of recovery from homonymous hemianopia subsequent to infarction in the distribution of posterior cerebral artery. J Neuroophthalmol 1991;11:33-9.
13. Huber A. Homonymous hemianopia. J Neuroophthalmol 1992;12:351-66.
14. Isa K, Miyashita K, Yanagimoto S, et al. Homonymous defect of macular vision in ischemic stroke. Eur Neurol 2001;46:126-30.
15. Zhang X, Kedar S, Lynn NJ, et al. Homonymous hemianopias: clinical anatomic correlations in a series of 904 cases. Neurology 2006;66:906-10.
16. Levin LA. Topical diagnosis of chiasmal and retrochiasmal disorders. In: Miller NR, Newman NJ, Biousse V, eds. Walsh and Hoyt's Clinical Neuro-Ophthalmology. 6th Ed, Vol 1. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005:503-73.
17. Biousse V, Newman NJ, Carroll C, et al. Visual fields in patients with posterior GPi pallidotomy. Neurology 1998;50:258-65.
18. Hoyt WF, Luis O. Visual fiber anatomy in the infrageniculate pathway of the primate. Arch Ophthalmol 1962;68:94-106.
19. Kline LB. Anatomy and physiology of the optic tracts and lateral geniculate nucleus. In: Miller NR, Newman NJ, eds. Walsh and Hoyt's Clinical Neuro-Ophthalmology. 5th Ed, Vol 1. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1998:101-20.