Light quality regulates shoot cluster growth and development of MM106 apple genotype in in vitro culture

Scientia Horticulturae

Volumn 108, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 364-370

  Muleo, Rosario ^a   Morini, Stefano ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TUSCIA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Apical dominance; Branching; Cluster; Light quality; Photobiology; Tissue culture

Indexed keywords

FRUIT; GENOTYPE; LIGHT EFFECT; SHOOT GROWTH; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION;

MALUS X DOMESTICA;

EID: 33748704712     PISSN: 03044238     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2006.02.014     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Baraldi R., Rossi F., and Lercari B. In vitro shoot development of Primus GF 655/2: interaction between light and benzyladenine. Physiol. Plant. 74 (1988) 440-443
2. Casal J.J. Environmental cues affecting development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 5 1 (2002) 37-42
3. Chatfield S.P., Stirnberg P., Forde B.G., and Leyser O. The hormonal regulation of axillary bud growth in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 24 2 (2000) 159-169
4. Chée R. In vitro culture of Vitis: the effects of light spectrum, manganese sulfate and potassium iodide on morphogenesis. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 7 (1986) 121-134
5. Cline M.G. Apical dominance. Bot. Rev. 57 (1991) 318-359
6. Cline M.G. The role of hormones in apical dominance. New approaches to an old problem in plant development. Physiol. Plant. 90 (1994) 230-237
7. Cline M.G., Wessel T., and Iwamura H. Cytokinin/auxin control of apical dominance in Ipomoea nil. Plant Cell Physiol. 38 (1997) 659-667
8. Dougher T.A.O., and Bugbee B. Evidence for yellow light expression of lettuce growth. Photochem. Photobiol. 73 2 (2001) 208-212
9. Driver J.A., and Kuniyuki A.H. In vitro propagation of Paradox walnut rootstock. HortScience 19 (1984) 507-509
10. Frechilla S., Talbott L.D., Bogomolni R.A., and Zeiger E. Reversal of blue light-stimulated stomatal opening by green light. Plant Cell Physiol. 41 2 (2000) 171-176
11. Furuya M., and Schäfer E. Photoperception and signalling of induction reactions by different phytochromes. Trend Plant Sci. 1 (1996) 301-307
12. Herrington E., and McPherson J.C. Light quality growth promotion of Spirea nipponica: the influence of a low photon fluence rate and transfer time to a higher fluence rate. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 32 (1993) 161-167
13. Hillman J.R. Apical dominance. In: Wilkins M.B. (Ed). Advances in Plant Physiology (1984), Pitman, London 127-148
14. Klee H.J., and Lanahan M.B. Transgenic plants in hormone biology. In: Davies P.J. (Ed). Plant Hormones, Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2nd ed. (1995), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 340-353
15. Lagarias J.C., Kelly J.M., Cyr K.L., and Smith W.O. Comparative photochemical analysis of highly purified 124 kilodalton oat and rye phytochrome in vitro. Photochem. Photobiol. 46 (1987) 5-16
16. Lechowski Z., and Bialczyk J. Interaction between green and far-red light on the low fluence rate and chloroplast orientation in Mougeotia. Plant Physio1. 85 (1987) 581-584
17. Lin C. Blue light receptors and signal transduction. Plant Cell 14 (2002) S207-S225
18. Loreti F., Muleo R., and Morini S. Effect of light quality on growth of in vitro cultured organs and tissue. Proc. Int. Plant Propagator's Soc. 40 (1991) 615-623
19. Mancinelli A.L. Some thoughts about the use of predicted values of the state of phytochrome in plant photomorphogenesis research. Plant Cell Environ. 11 (1988) 429-439
20. Martin G.C. Apical dominance. HortScience 22 (1987) 1071-1080
21. Muleo R., and Thomas B. Effects of light quality on shoot proliferation of Prunus cerasifera in vitro are the result of differential effects on bud induction and apical dominance. J. Hort. Sci. 72 3 (1997) 483-491
22. Muleo R., Morini S., and Casano S. Photoregulation of growth and branching of plum shoots: physiological action of two photosystems. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 37 (2001) 609-617
23. Napoli C., Beveridge C., and Snowden K. Re-evaluating concepts of apical dominance and the control of axillary bud outgrowth. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 44 (1999) 127-169
24. Ninu L., Ahmad M., Miarelli C., Cashmore A.R., and Giuliano G. Cryptochrome 1 controls tomato development in response to blue light. Plant J. 18 5 (1999) 551-556
25. Norton R.C., Norton E.M., and Herrington T. Light quality and light pipe in the micropropagation of woody ornamental plants grown in vitro. Acta Hort. 227 (1988) 453-456
26. Piagnani C., Iacona C., Intrieri M.C., and Muleo R. A new somaclone of Prunus avium shows diverse growth pattern under different spectral quality of radiation. Biol. Plant. 45 1 (2002) 11-117
27. Quail P.H. Photosensory perception and signalling in plant cells: new paradigms?. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 14 (2002) 180-188
28. Smith H. Sensing the light environment: the functions of the phytochrome family. In: Kendrick R.E., and Kronenberg G.H.M. (Eds). Photomorphogenesis in Plants. 2nd ed. (1994), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands 377-416
29. Smith H. Physiological and ecological function within the phytochrome family. Ann. Rev. Plant Phys. Plant Mol. Biol. 46 (1995) 289-315
30. Tamas L.A. Hormonal regulation of apical dominance. In: Davies P.J. (Ed). Plant Hormones, Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2nd ed. (1995), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 572-597
31. Whitelam G.C., and Halliday K.J. Phytochrome takes a partner!. Curr. Biol. 9 (1999) 225-227