Correlation between fiberoptic nasal endoscopy and acoustic rhinometry in adult without nasal complaints

American Journal of Rhinology

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 375-378

  Ouriques, Débora Mery ^a   Carlini, Daniela ^a   Fujita, Reginaldo ^a   Pignatari, Shirley Shizue Nagata ^a   Weckx, Luc Louis Maurice ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FIBERSCOPE ENDOSCOPY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NOSE CAVITY; RELIABILITY; RHINOMETRY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TURBINATE;

ADULT; ENDOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NASAL CAVITY; RHINOMETRY, ACOUSTIC;

EID: 33748679168     PISSN: 10506586     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2500/ajr.2006.20.2874     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Hillberg O, Jackson AC, Swift DL, et al. Acoustic rhinometry evaluation of nasal cavity geometry by acoustic reflection. J Appl Physiol 66:295-303, 1989.
2. Roithmann R. Rhinomanometry and acoustic rhinometry in clinical use. European Rhinologic Society/International Symposium meeting of Infection and Allergy of the Nose, Vienna, Austria, July 28-August 1, 1998. Monduzzi Editore International Proceedings Division, Bologna, Italy.
3. Djupesland PG, and Lyholm B. Nasal airway in term neonates measured by continuous wide-band noise acoustic rhinometry. Acta Otorhinolarnygol (Stockh) 117:424-432, 1997.
4. Djupesland G. Acoustic rhinometry optimized for infants: Technical properties and clinical applications. Thesis presented by the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ulleval University, Hospital University, Oslo, Norway, 40-43, 1999.
5. Carlini D, Ouriques DM, Weckx LLM, and Fujita RR. Modified method of acoustic rhinometry. Acta Otolaryngol 122: 298-301, 2002.
6. Corey JP, Gungor A, Nelson R, et al. A comparison of the nasal cross-sectional areas and volumes obtained with acoustic rhinometry and magnetic resonance imaging. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117:349-354, 1997.
7. Corey JP, Kemker BJ, Nelson R, et al. Evaluation of the nasal cavity by acoustic rhinometry in normal and allergic subjects. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 17:22-28, 1999.
8. Grymer LF, Hilberg O, Elbrond O, et al. Acoustic rhinometry evaluation of the nasal cavity with septal deviations, before and after septoplasty. Laryngoscope 99:1180-1187, 1989.
9. Lenders H, Schaefer J, and Pirsig W. Turbinate hypertrophy in habitual snores and patients with OSA: Findings of acoustic rhinometry. Laryngoscope 101:614, 1991.
10. Pirila T, and Tikanto J. Unilateral and bilateral effects of nasal septum surgery demonstrated with acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry, and subjective assessment. Am J Rhinol 15:127, 2001.
11. Lang C, Grutzenmacher S, Mlynki B, et al. Investigating the nasal cycle using endoscopy, rhinoresistometry, and acoustic rhinometry. Laryngoscope 113:284, 2003.
12. Corey JP, Nalbone V, and Ng BA. Anatomic correlates of acoustic rhinometry as measured by rigid nasal endoscopy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 121:572-576, 1999.
13. Committee on Standardization of Acoustic Rhinometry. Recommendations for technical specifications and standard operating procedures. Meeting of the European rhinologic society, International Symposium of Infection and Allergy of the Nose, Vienna, Austria July 28-August 1, 1998. Monduzzi Editore International Proceedings Division, Bologna, Italy.
14. Millqvist E, and Bende M. Reference values for acoustic rhinometry in subjects without nasal symptoms. Am J Rhinol 12:341-343, 1998.
15. Grymer LF, Hilberg O, Pedersen OF, et al. Acoustic rhinometry: Values from adults with subjective normal nasal patency. Rhinology 29:35-47, 1991.
16. Hasegawa M, and Kern EB. Variations in nasal resistance in man: A rhinomanometric study of the nasal cycle in 50 human subjects. Rhinology 16:19, 1978.
17. Hasegawa M. Nasal cycle and postural variations in nasal resistance. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 91:112, 1982.
18. Masing H. Rhinomanometry: Different techniques and results. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 33:566, 1979.
19. Tomkinson A. The reliability of acoustic rhinometry. J Laryngol Otol 109:1234, 1995.
20. Kalmovich LM, Elad D, Zaretsky U, et al. Endonasal geometry changes in elderly people: Acoustic rhinometry measurements. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 60:396-398, 2005.
21. Kim YK, Kang JH, and Yoon KS. Acoustic rhinometry evaluation of nasal cavity and nasopharynx after adenoidectomy and tonsillectomy. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 44:215-220, 1998.
22. Roithmann R, Cole P, Chapnik J, et al. Acoustic rhinometry in the evaluation of nasal obstruction. Laryngoscope 105: 275-281, 1995.
23. Grymer LF, Illum P, and Hilberg O. Bilateral inferior turbinoplasty in chronic nasal obstruction. Rhinology 34:50-53, 1996.
24. Nielsen LP, Bjerke T, Chritensen MB, et al. Assessment of the allergic reaction in seasonal rhinitis: Acoustic rhinometry is a sensitive and objective method. Clin Exp Allergy 26:1268-1275, 1996.
25. Morris LG, Burschtin O, Lebowitz RA, et al. Nasal obstruction and sleep-disordered breathing: A study using acoustic rhinometry. Am J Rhinol 19:33-39, 2005.
26. Oztürk F, Türktas I, Asal K, et al. Effect of intranasal triamcinolone acetonide on bronchial hyper-responsiveness in children with seasonal allergic rhinitis and comparison of perceptional nasal obstruction with acoustic rhinometric assessment. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 68:1007-10015, 2004.
27. Capone RB, and Sykes JM. The effect of rhytidectomy on the nasal valve. Arch Facial Plast Surg 7:45-50, 2005.