Interface restrictions on verb second

Linguistic Review

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 127-160

  Meinunger, André ^a  

^a Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft ZAS Berlin   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748675925     PISSN: 01676318     EISSN: 16133676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/TLR.2006.005     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Altmann, Hans (1981). Formen der Herausstellung im Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
2. Boeckx, Cédric and Sandra Stjepanovic (2001). Head-ing toward PF. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 345-355.
3. Bošković, Željko (2001). On the Nature of the Syntax-Phonology Interface - Cliticization and Related Phenomena. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
4. Büring, Daniel and Katharina Hartmann (2001). The syntax and semantics of focus-sensitive particles in German. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 229-281.
5. Chomsky, Noam (1994). Bare phrase structure. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 5.
6. [Reprinted (1995) in Government and Binding Theory and the Minimalist Program, Gert Webelhuth (ed.), 385-439. Oxford: Blackwell.
7. _ (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. _ (2000). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step: Papers in Minimalist Syntax in Honour of Howard Lasnik, Martin Roger, David Michaels and Juan Uriagareka (eds.), 89-155. Cambrigde, MA: MIT Press.
9. _ (2001). Derivation by phase. In A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz and Ken Hale (eds.), 1-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Cinque, Guglielmo (1999). Adverbs and Functional Heads. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. d'Avis, Franz Josef (2004). In front of the prefield - inside or outside the clause? In The Syntax and Semantics of the Left Periphery. Interface Explorations, Horst Lohnstein and Susanne Trissler (eds.), 139-177. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gryuter.
12. den Besten, Hans (1977/1983). On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. In On the Formal Syntax of the Westgermania, Werner Abraham (ed.), 47-131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
13. Ernst, Thomas (2002). The Syntax of Adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Fanselow, Gisbert (1993). The return of the base generators. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 36: 1-74.
15. _ (2004). Münchausen-style head movement and the analysis of verb second. Linguistics in Potsdam 22: 9-49.
16. _ (to appear). Surprising specifiers and cyclic spell-out. In Proceedings of Generative Linguistics in Poland 5. Warzawa: GLIP proceedings.
17. Fodor, Jerry A., Thomas Sever and Merrill Garrett (1974). The Psychology of Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics and Generative Grammar. New York: McGraw-Hill.
18. Fodor, Janet D. (1978). Parsing strategies and constraints on transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 427-473.
19. Frazier, Lyn (1979). On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies. PhD Dissertation, University of Connecticut.
20. Frey, Werner (2005). Pragmatic properties of certain German and English left peripheral constructions. To appear in: Linguistics 43 (1): 89-129.
21. Frey, Werner and Karin Pittner (1998). Zur Positionierung der Adverbiale im Deutschen Mittelfeld. Linguistische Berichte 176: 489-534. Westdeutscher Verlag.
22. Grimshaw, Jane (1991). Extended projections. Ms., Brandeis University, Brandeis, MA.
23. Grohmann, Kleanthes (2003). Prolific Domains: On the Anti-Locality of Movement Dependencies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
24. Hahnemann, Suzan (1999). Vergleiche im Vergleich. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
25. Haider, Hubert (1988). Zur Syntax der deutschen Nominalphrase. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 7: 32-59.
26. _ (1993). Deutsche Syntax Generativ. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
27. _ (1997). Typological implications of a directionality constraint on projections. In Studies on Universal Grammar and Typological Variation, Artemis Alexiadou and Tracy Hall (eds.), 17-33. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
28. Hall, Tracy A. (1999). German function words. In Studies on the Phonological Word, Tracy A. Hall and Ursula Kleinhenz (eds.), 99-131. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins.
29. Höhle, Tilmann (1991). Projektionsstufen bei V-Projektionen, ms. University of Tübingen.
30. Iatridou, Sabine and Anthony Kroch (1992). The licensing of CP-recursion and its relevance to the Germanic verb-second phenomenon. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 50:1-24.
31. Jacobs, Joachim (1983). Fokus und Skalen. Zur Syntax und Semantik der Gradpartikeln im Deutschen (Linguistische Arbeiten 138). Tübingen: Niemeyer.
32. Kajita, Masaru (1977). Towards a dynamic model of syntax. Studies in English Linguistics 5: 44-66.
33. Lakoff, George (1984). Syntactic amalgams. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 10: 312-344.
34. Koopman Hilda and Anna Szablolcsi (2000). Verbal Complexes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Meinunger, André (2001). Restrictions on verb raising. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 732-740.
36. _ (2004a). Interface restrictions on verb second. Linguistics in Potsdam 22: 51-81.
37. _ (2004b). On certain adverbials in the German 'Vorfeld'and 'Vor-vor-feld'. Sprache und Pragmatik 52: 64-78.
38. Müller, Gereon (2004). Verb-Second as vP-First. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 7: 179-234.
39. Müller, Stefan (2003). Mehrfache Vorfeldbesetzung. Deutsche Sprache 31 (1): 29-62.
40. Pittner, Karin (1999). Adverbiale im Deutschen, Untersuchungen zu ihrer Stellung und Interpretation, (Studien zur deutschen Grammatik 60). Tübingen: Stauffenberg.
41. _ (2003). Kasuskonflikte bei freien Relativsätzen. Eine Korpusstudie. Deutsche Sprache 31: 193-208.
42. Prince, Alan and Paul Smolensky (1993). Optimality theory. Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Ms. Rutgers University and Colorado University. Now available (=2004) from Blackwell Publishing Company, London.
43. Rapp, Irene and Arnim v. Stechow (1999). Kuf-hand-out, talk presented at ZAS institute Berlin.
44. Reis, Marga (2003). Wie fängt der deutsche Satz an? Anmerkungen zur syntaktischen Fehlbarkeit. Talk and handout delivered at Berlin Humboldt-University.
45. _ (2005). On the syntax of so-called focus particles in German - A reply to Büring and Hartmann 2001. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23: 459-483.
46. van Riemsdijk, Henk (1998). Trees and scions - Science and trees: Fest-Web-Page for Noam Chomsky, http://mitpress.mit.edu/chomskydisc/riemsdyk. html.
47. _ (2000). A far from simple matter: Syntactic reflexes of syntax-pragmatics misalignments. In Semantics, Pragmatics and Discourse. Perspectives and Connections. A Festschrift for Ferenc Kiefer, Robert M. Harnish and István Kenesei (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
48. Rizzi, Luigi (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax, Liliane Haegemann (ed.), 281-337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
49. Schröder, Jochen (1990). Lexikon deutscher Präpositionen (second edition) Leipzig: Verlag Enzyklopädie.
50. Thiersch, Craig (1978). Topics in German syntax. Ph.D. Dissertation, Cambridge, MA: MIT.
51. Truckenbrodt, Hubert (1995). Phonological phrases: Their relation to syntax, focus, and prominence. PhD Dissertation, Cambridge, MA: MIT.
52. Vikner, Sten (2005). Immobile complex verbs in Germanic. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 8: 83-115.
53. Vogel, Ralf (2003). Surface matters. Case conflict in free relative constructions and case theory. In New Perspectives on Case Theory, Ellen Brandner and Heike Zinsmeister (eds), 269-299. Stanford: CSLI publications.
54. Wilder, Chris (1998). Transparent free relatives. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 10: 191-199. Berlin: ZAS.
55. Zimmermann, Ilse (1991). Die subordinierende Konjunktion wie. In Fragesätze und Fragen, Marga Reis and Inger Rosengren (eds.), 113-122. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
56. Zwart, Jan Wouter (2001). Syntactic and phonological verb movement. Syntax 4 (1): 34-62.