Merits and limitations of continuous blood volume monitoring during haemodialysis Summary of the EDTNA/ERCA Journal Club discussion: Winter 2005

EDTNA-ERCA Journal

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 108-116

  Lindley, Elizabeth J ^a   Ward, Richard ^b   Pearson, Chris ^b   Harrington, Maurice ^b   O'Kane, Frankie ^b   Belot, Bertrand ^b   Shaldon, Stanley ^b   De Vos, Jean Yves ^b   Lopot, Franta ^b   Nikman, Anahita ^b   Curtis, Jim ^b   Schneditz, Danny ^b   Gerrish, Martin ^b   Roy, Thomas ^b   Tattersall, James ^b   Dasselaar, Judith ^b  

^a LEEDS TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Blood volume monitoring; Haemodialysis; Symptom free dialysis; Target weight

Indexed keywords

AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD; BLOOD VOLUME; BODY POSTURE; BODY WEIGHT; CHRONIC KIDNEY FAILURE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CONSENSUS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; EUROPE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; HEALTH SERVICE; HEMATOCRIT; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; MONITORING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; TIME;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); BLOOD VOLUME; BLOOD VOLUME DETERMINATION; BODY WEIGHT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CONSENSUS; EUROPE; FEEDBACK; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HEMATOCRIT; HUMANS; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; POSTURE; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; RENAL DIALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33748664185     PISSN: 1019083X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-6686.2006.tb00462.x     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Dasselaar JJ, Huisman RM, de Jong PE, Franssen CFM. Measurement of relative blood volume changes during haemodialysis: merits and limitations. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2005; 20: 2043-2049. Download available at http://www.edtna-erca.org/index.html?file=479
2. Reddan DN, Szczech LA, Hasselblad V, Lowrie EG, Lindsay RM, Himmelfarb J, Toto RD, Stlvelman J, Winchester JF, Zillman LA, Califf RM, Owen WF Jr. Intradialytic blood volume monitoring in ambulatory hemodialysis patients: a randomized trial. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2005; 16:2162-2169. Renalweb comment from Ed Lowrie http://64.226.123.76/cgi-local/ ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=15&t=000597#000000
3. Mitra S, Chamney P, Greenwood R, Farrington K. Linear decay of relative blood volume during ultrafiltration predicts hemodynamic instability. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 2002; 40: 556-565.
4. Schneditz D, Kauffman AM, Polashegg HD, Levin NW, Daugirdas JT. Cardiopulmonary recirculation during hemodialysis. Kidney International 1992; 42: 1450-1456.
5. Schallenberg U, Stiller S, Mann H. A new method of continuous haemoglobinometric measurement of blood volume during dialysis. Life Support Systems 1987; 5: 293-305.
6. Mitra S, Chamney P, Greenwood R, Farrington K. The relationship between systemic and whole-body hematocrit is not constant during ultrafiltration on hemodialysis. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2004; 15: 463-469. Free download available at http://jasn.asnjournals.org/cgi/reprint/15/ 2/463
7. Chazot Charles. Gradient between predialysis plasma sodium and prescribed sodium dialysate: a cross-sectional study in a large cohort of hemodialysis patients. Abstract available at http://www.isbp.org/abstracts5_sub?abstract= 126
8. Lindley EJ et al. Autumn 2004 EDTNA/ERCA Renal Care Journal Club Discussion Summary. EDTNA/ERCA Journal 2005; 31: 108-113.
9. Kikuchi Y, Koyoma T. Role of protein adsorption in micropore passability of red blood cells. Japanese Journal of Physiology 1981; 31: 903-915.