Competition affects the production of first backcross offspring on F 1-hybrids, Brassica napus × B. rapa

Euphytica

Volumn 150, Issue 1-2, 2006, Pages 17-25

  Johannessen, Marina Mosbæk ^a   Damgaard, Christian ^b   Andersen, Bente Anni ^a   Jørgensen, Rikke Bagger ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Density; Field trial; Glufosinate ammonium tolerance; Inter SSR; Proportion; Transplastomic

Indexed keywords

BRASSICA NAPUS;

EID: 33748663316     PISSN: 00142336     EISSN: 15735060     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-006-9083-x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Aksouh, N.M., B.C. Jacobs, F.L. Stoddard & R.J. Mailer, 2001. Response of canola to different heat stresses. Aust J Agr Res 52: 817-824.
2. Ammitzbøll, H.A., T. Mikkelsen & R.B. Jørgensen, 2005. Environmental effects of transgene expression on hybrid fitness - a case study on oilseed rape. Environmental Biosafety Research 4: 3-12.
3. Arnold, M.L., 1997. Natural hybridization: Concepts and theory. In: Natural hybridization and evolution M.L. Arnold (Ed.), pp. 113-154. Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford.
4. Bateman, A.J., 1955. Self-incompatibility systems in angiosperms. III Cruciferae. Heredity 9: 52-68.
5. Chamberlain, D. & C.N. Stewart, 1999. Transgene escape and transplastomics. Nat Biotechnol 17: 330-331.
6. Chèvre, A.M., H. Ammitzbøll, B. Breckling, A. Dietz-Pfeilstetter, F. Eber, A. Fargue, C. Gomez-Campo, E. Jenczewsk, R.B. Jørgensen, C. Lavigne, M.S. Meier, H. Nijs, K. Pascher, G. Seguin-Swartz, J. Sweet, C.N. Stewart & S. Warwick, 2004. A review on interspecific gene flow from oilseed rape to wild relatives. In: H. Nijs, D. Bartsch & J. Sweet (Eds.), Introgression from Genetically Modified Plants into wild relatives and its consequences, pp. 235-251. CABI publishing, UK.
7. Charters, Y.M., A. Robertson, M.J. Wilkinson & G. Ramsay, 1996. PCR analysis of oilseed rape cultivars (Brassica napus L. ssp. oleifera) using 5′-anchored simple sequence repeat (SSR) primers. Theor Appl Genet 92: 442-447.
8. Daniell, H., M.S. Khan & L. Allison, 2002. Milestones in chloroplast genetic engineering: An environmentally friendly era in biotechnology. Trends in Plant Science 7: 84-91.
9. Erickson, L. & R. Kemble, 1990. Paternal inheritance of mitochondria in rapeseed (Brassica napus). Mol Gen Genet 222: 135-139.
10. Hansen, L.B., H.R. Siegismund & R.B. Jørgensen, 2001. Introgression between oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) and its weedy relative B. rapa L. in a natural population. Genet Resour Crop Ev 48: 621-627.
11. Hansen, L.B., H.R. Siegismund & R.B. Jørgensen, 2003. Progressive introgression between Brassica napus (oilseed rape) and B. rapa. Heredity 91: 276-283.
12. Hauser, T.P., C. Damgaard & R.B. Jørgensen, 2003. Frequency-dependent fitness of hybrids between oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and weedy B. rapa (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot 90: 571-578.
13. Hauser, T.P., R.B. Jørgensen & H. Østergård, 1997. Preferential exclusion of hybrids in mixed pollinations between oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and weedy B. campestris (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot 84: 756-762.
14. 1-hybrids demonstrated by cpDNA markers specific to oilseed rape and B. rapa. Molecular Breeding 16: 271-278.
15. Johannessen, M.M., B.A. Andersen & R.B. Jørgensen, 2006. Competition affects gene flow from oilseed rape (♀) to Brassica rapa (♂). Heredity 96: 360-367.
16. Jørgensen, R.B. & B. Andersen, 1994. Spontaneous hybridization between oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and weedy B. campestris (Brassicaceae): A risk of growing genetically modified oilseed rape. Am J Bot 81: 1620-1626.
17. Jørgensen, R.B., H. Ammitzbøll, L.B Hansen., M. Johannesen, B. Andersen & T.P. Hauser, 2004. Gene introgression and consequences in Brassica. In: H. Nijs, D. Bartsch & J. Sweet (Eds.), Introgression from genetically modified plants into wild relatives and its consequences, pp. 253-262. CABI publishing, UK.
18. Landbo, L., B. Andersen & R.B. Jørgensen, 1996. Natural hybridisation between oilseed rape and a wild relative: Hybrids among seeds from weedy B. campestris. Hereditas 125: 89-91.
19. Landbo, L. & R.B. Jørgensen, 1997. Seed germination in weedy Brassica campestris and its hybrids with B. napus: Implications for risk assessment of transgenic oilseed rape. Euphytica 97: 209-216.
20. Lu, CM, M. Kato & F. Kakihara, 2002. Destiny of a transgene escape from Brassica napus into Brassica rapa. Theor Appl Genet 105: 78-84.
21. Lydiate, D., A. Sharpe, U. Lagercrantz & I. Parkin, 1993. Mapping the Brassica genome. Outlook Agr 22: 85-92.
22. Mikkelsen, T.R., B. Andersen & R.B. Jørgensen, 1996a. The risk of crop transgene spread. Nature 380: 31.
23. Mikkelsen, T.R., J. Jensen & R.B. Jørgensen, 1996b. Inheritance of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) RAPD markers in a backcross progeny with Brassica campestris. Theor Appl Genet 92: 492-497.
24. Milligan, B.G., 1998. Total DNA Isolation. In: A. R. Hoelzel (Ed.), Molecular Genetic Analysis of Populations. A Practical Approach, chapter 2, Oxford University Press.
25. 1-hybrids when pollinating B. rapa seeds. Heredity 89: 212-218.
26. Scott, S. & M. Wilkinson, 1999. Low probability of chloroplast movement from oilseed rape (Brassica napus) into wild Brassica rapa. Nat Biotechnol 17: 390-393.
27. Snow, A.A., B. Andersen & R.B. Jørgensen, 1999. Costs of transgenic herbicide resistance introgressed from Brassica napus into weedy B. rapa. Mol Ecol 8: 605-615.
28. Tomiuk, J., T.P. Hauser & R.B. Jørgensen, 2000. A- or C-chromosomes does it matter for the transfer of transgenes from Brassica napus? Theor Appl Genet 100: 750-754.
29. U.N., 1935. Genome-analysis in Brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of B. napus and peculiar mode of fertilization. Jpn J Bot 7: 389-453.