The efficiency of self-citations in economics

Scientometrics

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 69-84

  Medoff, Marshall H ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748656723     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-006-0139-4     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. BLAUG, M., STURGES, P. (1982), Who's Who in Economics, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
2. BODENHORN, H. (2003), Economic scholarship at elite liberal colleges: a citation analysis with rankings, Journal of Economic Education, 34: 341-359.
3. DAVIS, P., PAPANEK, G. F. (1984), Faculty ratings of major economics departments by citations, American Economic Review, 74: 225-230.
4. DIAMOND, A. M. (1986), What is a citation worth? Journal of Human Resources, 21: 200-215.
5. DIAMOND, A. M. (1989), The core journals of economics, Current Contents, 21: 4-11.
6. GANS, J. S., SHEPHERD, G. B. (1994), How are the mighty fallen: rejected classic articles by leading economists, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8: 165-179.
7. HUDSON, J. (1996), Trends in multi-authored papers in economics, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10: 153-158.
8. JOHNSON, D. (1997), Getting noticed in economics: the determinants of academic citations, American Economist, 41: 43-52.
9. LAB AND, D. N. (1990), Is there value-added from the review process in economics? Preliminary evidence from authors, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105: 341-352.
10. LABAND, D. N., PIETTE, M. J. (1994a), Favoritism versus search for good papers: empirical evidence regarding the behavior of journal editors, Journal of Political Economy, 102: 194-203.
11. LABAND, D. N., PIETTE, M. J. (1994b), The relative impacts of economics journals: 1970-1990, Journal of Economic Literature, 32: 640-666.
12. LABAND, D. N., TOLLISON, R. D. (2000), Intellectual collaboration, Journal of Political Economy, 108: 632-662.
13. LEIBOWITZ, S. J., PALMER, J. P. (1988), Assessing assessments of the relative quality of economics departments, Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, 28: 88-113.
14. McCLOSKEY, D. N., ZILIAK, S. T. (1996), The standard error of regressions, Journal of Economic Literature, 34:97-114.
15. MEDOFF, M. H. (1989), The ranking of economists, Journal of Economic Education, 20: 405-415.
16. MEDOFF, M. H. (2003), Collaboration and the quality of economics research, Labour Economics, 10: 597-608.
17. MERTON, R. K. (1968), The Matthew effect in science, Science, 159: 56-63.
18. QUANDT, R. E. (1976), Some quantitative aspects of the economics journal literature, Journal of Political Economy, 84:741-755.
19. SAUER, R. D. (1988), Estimates of the returns to quality and coauthorship in economic academia, Journal of Political Economy, 96: 855-866.
20. SCOTT, L.C., MITIAS, P. M. (1996), Trends in rankings of economics departments in the U.S.: an update, Economic Inquiry, 34: 378-400.
21. VANDERMEULEN, A. (1972), Manuscripts in the maelstrom: a theory of the editorial process, Public Choice, 13: 107-111.