Modification of plant arrangement suppresses white mold of snap beans

HortScience

Volumn 41, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 1298-1302

  Peachey, Ed ^a   Ludy, Robin L ^b   Powelson, Mary L ^a   McGrath, Daniel M ^c  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Oregon Department of Agriculture   (United States)

^c OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cultural control; Disease suppression; Phaseolus vulgaris

Indexed keywords

DISEASE CONTROL; DISEASES; FUNGICIDES;

CULTURAL CONTROL; DISEASE SUPPRESSION; PHASEOLUS VULGARIS;

CROPS;

DISEASES; FARM CROPS; FUNGICIDES; YIELD;

PHASEOLUS VULGARIS; SCLEROTINIA SCLEROTIORUM;

EID: 33748644018     PISSN: 00185345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21273/hortsci.41.5.1298     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Abawi, G.S. and R.G. Grogan. 1979. Epidemiology of diseases caused by Sclerotinia species. Phytopathology 69:899-904.
2. Blad, B.L., J.R. Steadman, and A. Weiss. 1978. Canopy structure and irrigation influence white mold disease and microclimate of dry edible beans. Phytopathology 68:1431-1437.
3. Defransico J. 2005. Pest management strategic plan for processed snap beans in Oregon and Washington. Oregon State University Extension Service. Available at: http://wsprs.wsu.edu/SnapBeanPMSP.pdf. Accessed April 11, 2006.
4. Deshpande, R.Y., K.G. Hubbard, D.P. Coyne, and J.R. Steadman. 1995. Estimating leaf wetness in dry bean canopies as a prerequisite to evaluating white mold disease. Agron. J. 87:613-619.
5. Grau, C.R. and V.L. Radke. 1984. Effects of cultivars and cultural practices on Sclerotinia stem rot of soybean. Plant Dis. 68:56-58.
6. Johnson, K.B. and M.L. Powelson. 1983. Fungicide evaluation for control of gray mold and white mold of snap beans. Fung. and Nemat. Tests 38:91-92.
7. Kerr, E.D., J.A. Smith, C.D. Yonts, and R.G. Wilson. 1992. Fungicide efficacy for bean white mold under different plant populations and row spacings. Ann. Rep. Bean Improv. Coop. 35:52-53.
8. Ludwig, L.W. and L.B. Hunter. 1990. Efficacy of fungicides applied after inoculation for control of white mold of snap beans. Fung. and Nemat. Tests 45:96.
9. Ludy, R.L. and M.L. Powelson. 1992. Efficacy of foliar fungicides for control of gray mold and white mold of snap beans. Fung. and Nemat. Tests. 48:100.
10. Mack, H.J. and G.W. Varseveld. 1982. Response of bush snap beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to irrigation and plant density. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 107:286-290.
11. Mansour, B. and D. Hemphill. 2002. Vegetable Production Guidelines. Horticulture Department, Oregon State University. Available at: http://oregonstate.edu/Dept/NWREC/vegindex.html. Accessed April 11, 2006.
12. Park, S.J. 1993. Response of bush and upright plant type selections to white mold and seed yield of common beans grown in various row widths in southern Ontario. Can. J. Plant Sci. 73:265-272.
13. Powelson, M. 1980. Fungicide evaluation for control of gray mold and white mold of snap beans. Fung. and Nemat. Tests. 35:57-58.
14. Saindon, G., H.C. Huang, G.C. Kozub, H.H. Mundel, and G.A. Kemp. 1993. Incidence of white mold and yield of upright bean grown in different planting patterns. J. Phytopathol. 137:118-124.
15. Saindon, G., H.C. Huang, and G.C. Zozub. 1995. White-mold avoidance and agronomic attributes of upright common beans grown at multiple planting densities in narrow rows. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 120:843-847.
16. Shah, D.A., H.R. Dillard, and A. Cobb. 2002. Alternatives to vinclozolin (Ronilan) for controlling gray and white mold on snap bean pods in New York. Plant Health Prog. Sept:1-6.
17. Steadman, J.R., D.P. Coyne, and G.E. Cook. 1973. Reduction of severity of white mold disease on great northern beans by wider row spacing and determinate plant growth habit. Plant Dis. Rep. 5:1070-1071.
18. Wahab, M.N.J., D.H. Dabbs, and R.J. Baker. 1986. Effects of planting density and design on pod yield of bush snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Can. J. Plant Sci. 66:669-675.