Statistical characteristics of surrogate data based on geophysical measurements

Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 449-466

  Venema, V ^a   Bachner, S ^a   Rust, H W ^b   Simmer, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^b POTSDAM INSTITUTE FOR CLIMATE IMPACT RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; FOURIER TRANSFORM; GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY; RUNOFF; TEMPERATURE EFFECT; TIME SERIES;

EID: 33748638370     PISSN: 10235809     EISSN: 16077946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/npg-13-449-2006     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Bardet, J.-M., Lang, G., Oppenheim, G., Philippe, A., and Taqqu, M. S.: Generators of long-range dependent processes: A survey, in: Theory and Applications of Long-Range Dependence, edited by: Oppenheim, G., Taqqu, M. S., and Doukha, P., Birkhäuse, Boston, USA, 579-623, 2003.
2. Beran, J.: Statistics for Long-Memory Processes, Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, Chapman & Hall, New York, USA, 1994.
3. Beran, J., Bhansali, R. J., and Ocker, D.: On unified model selection for stationary and nonstationary short- and long-memory autoregressive processes, Biometrika, 85, 921-934, 1998.
4. Bisaglia, L.: Model selection for long-memory models, Quaderni di Statistica, 4, 2002.
5. Brockwell, P. J. and Davis, R. A.: Time series: theory and methods, Springer series in statistics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1991.
6. Christakos, G.: Random field models in earth sciences, Academic Press, San Diego, USA, 474 p., ISBN: 0-12-174230-X, 1992.
7. Davis, A., Marshak, A., Cahalan, R., and Wiscombe, W.: The LANDSAT scale break in stratocumulus as a three-dimensional radiative transfer effect: implications for cloud remote sensing, J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 241-260, 1997.
8. Davis, A. B., Marshak, A., Gerber, H., and Wiscombe, W. J.: Horizontal structure of marine boundary layer clouds from centimeter to kilometer scales, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 6123-6144, 1999.
9. Coles, S.: An introduction to statistical modeling of extreme values, Springer series in statistics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2001.
10. DWD, Deutscher Wetterdienst: http://www.dwd.de/en/FundE/Klima/KLIS, Offenbach, Germany, 2006.
11. GRDC, Global Runoff Data Centre of the Federal Institute of Hydrology: http://grdc.bafg.de, Koblenz, Germany, 2006.
12. Evans, K. F. and Wiscombe, W. J.: An algorithm for generating stochastic cloud fields from radar profile statistics, Atmos. Res., 72, 263-289, 2004.
13. Frisch, U.: Turbulence, the legacy of A.N. Kolmogorov, Cambridge University Press, UK, ISBN: 0521457130, 1995.
14. Gençai, R., Selçuk, F., and Ulugülyagci, A.: EVIM: A Software Package for Extreme Value Analysis in MATLAB, Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics 5, 213-239, 2001.
15. Kugiumtzis, D.: Test your surrogate data before you test for nonlinearity, Phys. Rev. E, 60, 2808-2816, 1999.
16. Hannan, E. J. and Quinn, B. G.: The determination of the order of an autoregression, J. Roy. Statist. Soc., 41, 190-195, 1979.
17. Haslett, J. and Raftery, A. E.: Space-time modelling with long-memory dependence: Assessing Ireland's wind power resource, J. Appl. Statist., 38, 1-50, 1989.
18. Kallache, M., Rust, H., and Kropp, J.: Trend Assessment: Applications for Hydrology and Climate, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 2, 201-210, 2005, http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/2/201/2005/.
19. Kantz, H. and Schreiber, T.: Nonlinear time series analysis, Cambridge Nonlinear Science Series No. 7, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, 1997.
20. Koutsoyiannis, D.: The Hurst phenomenon and fractional Gaussian noise made easy, Hydrol. Sci. J., 47, 573-595, 2002.
21. Kuhn, Th.: The structure of scientific revolutions, Chicago University Press, USA, 1963.
22. Kylling, A., Webb, A. R., Kift, R., et al.: Spectral actinic flux in the lower troposphere: measurement and 1-D simulations for cloudless, broken cloud and overcast situations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 1975-1997, 2005, http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/1975/2005/.
23. Lehmann, A.: Die Säkulare Klimareihe von Potsdam, in: Klimastatusbericht 2001, DWD, Offenbach a.M., Germany, 227-239, 2001.
24. Lohre, M., Sibbertsen P., and Könnig, T.: Modeling water flow of the Rhine River using seasonal long memory, Water Resour. Res., 39, 1132, doi:10.1029/2002WR001697, 2003.
25. Hurst, H. E.: Long-term storage capacity of reservoirs, Trans. Am. Soc. Civil Eng., 116, 770-799, 1951.
26. Mandelbrot, B. B. : The Fractal Geometry of Nature, W H Freeman, New York, USA, ISBN: 0716711869, 460 p., 1982.
27. Masters, F. and Gurley, K. R.: Non-Gaussian Simulation: Cumulative Distribution Function Map-Based Spectral Correction, J. Eng. Mech., 1418-1428, 2003.
28. Montanari, A., Rosso, R., and Taqqu, M. S.: Fractional differenced ARIMA models applied to hydrologic time series: Identification, estimation and simulation, Water Resour. Res., 33, 1035, 97WR00043, 1997.
29. Molz, F. J., Rajaram, H., and Lu, S.: Stochastic fractal-based models of heterogeneity in subsurface hydrology: origins, applications, limitations, and future research questions, Rev. Geophys., 42, RG1002/2004, 2004.
30. Pincus, R., Hannay, C., and Evans, K. F.: The accuracy of determining three-dimensional radiative transfer effects in cumulus clouds using ground-based profiling instruments, J. Atmos. Sc., 62, 2284-2293, 2005.
31. Radziejewski, M., Bardossy, A., and Kundzewicz, S.: Detection of change in river flow using phase randomization, Hydrol. Sci. J., 45, 547-558, 2000.
32. Rust, H.: http://www.pik-potsdam.de/~hrust/tools.html, 2006.
33. Scheirer, R. and Macke, A.: On the accuracy of the independent column approximation in calculating the downward fluxes in the UVA, UVB and PAR spectral ranges, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 14301-14312, 2001.
34. Scheirer, R. and Schmidt, S.: CLABAUTAIR: a new algorithm for retrieving three-dimensional cloud structure from airborne microphysical measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2333-2340, 2005, http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/2333/ 2005/.
35. Schreiber, T. and Schmilz, A.: Improved surrogate data for nonlinearity tests, Phys. Rev. Lett., 77, 635-638, 1996.
36. Schreiber, Th.: Constrained randomization of time series data, Phys. Rev. Lett., 80, 2105-2108, 1998.
37. Schreiber, T. and Schmitz, A.: Surrogate time series, Physica D, 142, 346-382, 2000.
38. Theiler, J., Eubank, S., Longtin, A., Galdrikian, B., and Farmer, J. D.: Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data, Physica D, 58, 77-94 1992.
39. Theiler, J. and Prichard, D.: Constrained-realization Monte-Carlo method for hypothesis testing, Physica D, 94, 221-235, 1996.
40. Timmer, J. and König, M. On generating power law noise, A&A, 300, 707-710, 1995.
41. Turcotte, D. L.: Fractals and Chaos in Geology and Geophysics, Cambridge University Press, U.K., ISBN: 0521567335, 412, 1997.
42. Venema, V., Meyer, S., Gimeno García, S., Kniffka, A., Simmer, C., Crewell, S., Löhnert, U., Trautmann, U., and Macke, A.: Surrogate cloud fields generated with the Iterative Amplitude Adapted Fourier Transform algorithm, Tellus 58A, 104-120, 2006a.
43. Venema, V., Ament, F., and Simmer, C.: A Stochastic Iterative Amplitude Adjusted Fourier Transform Algorithm with improved accuracy, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 13, 321-328, 2006b.
44. Venema, V: http://www.meteo.uni-bonn.de/mitarbeiter/venema/themes/ surrogates/iaaft/statistics, 2006.
45. Venema, V: An evolutionary search algorithm to generate 3D cloud fields with measured cloud boundary statistics, report, http://www.meteo.uni-bonn.de/ victor/articles/2003/ 2003_report_cloud_boundaries_evol_search.pdf, 2003.
46. Wilson, J., Lovejoy, S., and Schertzer, D.: Continuous multiplicative cascade models of rain and clouds. Scaling, fractals and non-linear variability in geophysics, edited by: Schertzer, D. and Lovejoy, S., 185-208, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1991.