Outcomes of involuntary hospital admission - A review

Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Volumn 114, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 232-241

  Katsakou, C ^a   Priebe, S ^a,b  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b NEWHAM CENTRE FOR MENTAL HEALTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Coercion; Commitment of mentally ill; Hospital; Outcome assessment (health care); Patient admission; Review

Indexed keywords

DEMOGRAPHY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH SERVICE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL PATIENT; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RECORD; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

COMMITMENT OF MENTALLY ILL; DATABASES; DATABASES AS TOPIC; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; MENTAL DISORDERS; PATIENT ADMISSION; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 33748614066     PISSN: 0001690X     EISSN: 16000447     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2006.00823.x     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. ZINKLER M, PRIEBE S. Detention of the mentally ill in Europe - a review. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2002;106:3-8.
2. HOYER G. On the justification for civil commitment. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2000;101:65-71.
3. NILSTUN T, SYSE A. The right to accept and the right to refuse. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2000;101:31-34.
4. CARROLL JS. Consent to mental health treatment: a theoretical analysis of coercion, freedom and control. Behav Sci Law 1991;9:129-142.
5. WERTHEIMER A. A philosophical examination of coercion for mental health issues. Behav Sci Law 1993;11:239-258.
6. CHODOFF P. Involuntary hospitalisation of the mentally ill as a moral issue. Am J Psychiatry 1984;141:384-389.
7. KALTIALA-HEINO R. On coercion in psychiatry: historical and theoretical aspects. Psychiatria Fennica 1996;27:68-78.
8. KALTIALA-HEINO R. Methodological issues in measuring coercion in psychiatric treatment. Res Community Ment Health 1999;10:123-139.
9. VERKERK M. A care perspective on coercion and autonomy. Bioethics 1999;13:358-368.
10. OLSEN DP. Influence and coercion: relational and rights-based ethical approaches to forced psychiatric treatment. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2003;10:705-712.
11. MILLER RD. The continuum of coercion: constitutional and clinical considerations in the treatment of the mentally disordered persons. Denver Univ Law Rev 1997;74:1169-1214.
12. GARDNER W, LIDZ C, HOGE SK, et al. Patients' revisions of their beliefs about the need for hospitalisation. Am J Psychiatry 1999;156:1385-1391.
13. HOUSTON KG, MARIOTTO M, HAYS JR. Outcomes for psychiatric patients following first admission: relationships with voluntary and involuntary treatment and ethnicity. Psychol Rep 2001;88:1012-1014.
14. KALTIALA-HEINO R, LAIPPALA P, SALONGAKAS R. Impact of coercion on treatment outcome. Int J Law Psychiatry 1997;20:311-322.
15. NICHOLSON R, EKENSTAM C, NORWOOD S. Coercion and the outcome of psychiatric hospitalisation. Int J Law Psychiatry 1996;19:201-217.
16. RAIN SD, WILLIAMS VF, ROBBINS PC, et al. Perceived coercion and hospital admission and adherence to mental health treatment after discharge. Psychiatr Serv 2003;54:103-105.
17. BINDMAN J, REID Y, SZMUKLER G, et al. Perceived coercion at admission to psychiatric hospital and engagement with follow-up: a cohort study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2005;40:160-166.
18. BENNETT N, LIDZ C, MONAHAN J, et al. Inclusion, motivation, and good faith: the morality of coercion in mental hospital admission. Behav Sci Law 1993;11:295-306.
19. HOGE S, LIDZ C, EISENBERG M, et al. Perceptions of coercion in the admission of voluntary and involuntary psychiatric patients. Int J Law Psychiatry 1997;20:167-181.
20. LIDZ C, HOGE S, GARDNER W, et al. Perceived coercion in mental hospital admission: pressures and process. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1995;52:1034-1039.
21. LIDZ C, MULVEY E, HOGE S, et al. Factual sources of mental patients' perceptions of coercion in the hospital admission process. Am J Psychiatry 1998;155:1254-60.
22. LIDZ C, MULVEY E, HOGE S, et al. The validity of mental patients' accounts of coercion-related behaviors in the hospital admission process. Law Hum Behav 1997;21:361-376.
23. LIDZ C, MULVEY E, HOGE S, et al. Sources of coercive behaviors in psychiatric admissions. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2000;101:73-79.
24. BHUI K, STANSFELD S, HULL S, et al. Ethnic variations in pathways through primary care and to specialist mental health services: a systematic review. Br J Psychiatry 2003;182:105-116.
25. GOVE W, FAIN T. A comparison of voluntary and committed psychiatric patients. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1977;34:669-676.
26. SPENSLEY J, EDWARDS DW, WHITE E. Patient satisfaction and involuntary treatment. Am J Orthopsychiatry 1980;50:725-729.
27. SRINIVASAN DP, SOUNDARAJAN PC, HULLIN RP. Attitudes of patients and relatives to compulsory admission. Br J Psychiatry 1980;136:200-204.
28. TOWES J, EL-GUEBALY N, LECKIE A. Patients' reactions to their commitment. Can J Psychiatry 1981;26:251-254.
29. KANE JM, QUITKIN F, RIFKIN A, et al. Attitudinal changes of involuntarily committed patients following treatment. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1983;40:374-377.
30. TOWES J, EL-GUEBALY N, LECKIE A, et al. Patients' attitudes at the time of their commitment. Can J Psychiatry 1984;29:590-595.
31. TOWES J. Change with time in patients reactions to committal. Can J Psychiatry 1986;31:413-415.
32. BRADFORD B, MC CANN S, MERSKEY H. A survey of involuntary patients' attitudes towards their commitment. Psychiatr J Univ Ott 1986;11:163-165.
33. BECK JC, GOLOWKA EA. A study of enforced treatment in relation to Stone's 'thank you' theory. Behav Sci Law 1988;6:559-566.
34. SPENCE ND, GOLDNEY RD, COSTAIN WF. Attitudes towards psychiatric hospitalization: a comparison of involuntary and voluntary patients. Aust Clin Rev 1988;8:108-116.
35. MCEVOY JP, APPLEBAUM PS, APPERSON LJ, et al. Why must some schizophrenic patients be involuntarily committed? Compr Psychiatry 1989;30:13-17.
36. CONLON P, MERSKEY H, ZILLI C, et al. The attitudes towards committal of patients hospitalised in a psychiatric facility for the first time. Can J Psychiatry 1990;35:324-327.
37. RUSIUS C. The Mental Health Act 1983 - what does the patient think? Psychiatr Bull 1992;17:462-465.
38. KJELLIN L, NILSTUN T. Medical and social paternalism: regulations of and attitudes towards compulsory psychiatric care. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1993;88:415-419.
39. KJELLIN L, WESTRIN C-G, ERIKSSON K, et al. Coercion in psychiatric care. Problems of medical ethics in a comprehensive empirical study. Behav Sci Law 1993;11:323-334.
40. WESTRIN CG, NILSTUN T, AXELSSON M, et al. An empirical study of commitment and involuntary treatment in Sweden. Psychiatry: a world perspective 1990;4:798-803.
41. SVENSSON B, HANSSON L. Patient satisfaction with inpatient psychiatric care. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1994;90:379-384.
42. KJELLIN L, ANDERSON K, CANDEFJORD I, et al. Ethical benefits and costs of coercion in short-term inpatient psychiatric care. Psychiatr Serv 1997;48:1567-1570.
43. KJELLIN L, WESTRIN CG. Involuntary admissions and coercive measures in psychiatric care. Int J Law Psychiatry 1998;21:31-42.
44. WESTRIN CG, NILSTUN T. Psychiatric ethics and health services research: concepts and research strategies. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2000;101:47-50.
45. WESTRIN CG. Compulsory psychiatric care - an arena for conflicts and research. Nord J Psychiatry 1997;51:57-61.
46. KJELLIN L, ANDERSON K, BARTHOLDSON E, et al. Coercion in psychiatric care - patients' and relatives' experiences from four Swedish psychiatric services. Nord J Psychiatry 2004;58:153-159.
47. WALLSTEN T, KJELLIN L. Involuntarily and voluntarily admitted patients' experiences of psychiatric admission and treatment - a comparison before and after changed legislation in Sweden. Eur Psychiatry 2004;19:464-468.
48. HOYER G, KJELLIN L, ENGBERG M, et al. Paternalism and autonomy: a presentation of a Nordic study on the use of coercion in the mental health care system. Int J Law Psychiatry 2002;25:93-108.