Research proposal: Evaluation of art in adult patients

Journal of Applied Oral Science

Volumn 14, Issue SPEC. ISS., 2006, Pages 25-29

  Zanata, Régia Luzia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Atraumatic Restorative Treatment; Glass ionomer cements; Normal pregnancy; Oral health

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748612429     PISSN: 16787757     EISSN: 16787765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572006000700006     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Bonecker M, Grossman E, Cleaton-Jones PE, Parak R. Clinical, histological and microbiological study of hand-excavated carious dentine in extracted permanent teeth. SADJ 2003;58(7):273-8.
2. Carvalho CK, Bezerra AC. Microbiological assessment of saliva from children subsequent to atraumatic restorative treatment (ART). Int J Paediatr Dent. 2003; 13(3):186-92.
3. Ewoldsen N, Covey D, Lavin M. The physical and adhesive properties of dental cements used for atraumatic restorative treatment. Spec Care Dentist. 1997;17(1):19-24.
4. Frencken JE, Van 't Hof MA, Van Amerongen WE, Holmgren CJ. Effectiveness of single-surface ART restorations in the permanent dentition: a meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2004;83(2):120-3.
5. Frencken JE, Makoni F, Sithole WD. ART restorations and glass ionomer sealants in Zimbabwe: survival after 3 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1998;26(6):372-81.
6. Frencken JE, Pilot T, Songpaisan Y, Phantumvanit P. Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): rationale, technique, and development. J Public Health Dent. 1996;56(sp. Issue):135-40.
7. Ho TF, Smales RJ, Fang DT. A 2-year clinical study of two glass ionomer cements used in the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1999;27(3):195-201.
8. Kalf-Scholte SM, van Amerongen WE, Smith AJ, van Haastrecht HJ. Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): a three-year clinical study in Malawi - comparison of conventional amalgam and ART restorations. J Public Health Dent. 2003;63(2):99-103.
9. Lo EC, Luo Y, Fan MW, Wei SH. Clinical investigation of two glass-ionomer restoratives used with the atraumatic restorative treatment approach in China: two-years results. Caries Res. 2001;35(6):458-63.
10. Lo EC, Holmgren CJ. Provision of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) restorations to Chinese pre-school children - a 30-month evaluation. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2001;11(1):3-10.
11. Luo Y, Wei SH, Fan MW, Lo EC. Clinical investigation of a high-strength glass ionomer restorative used with the ART technique in Wuhan, China: one-year results. Chin J Dent Res. 1999;2(3-4):73-8.
12. Mandari GJ, Frencken JE, van't Hof MA. Six-year success rates of occlusal amalgam and glass-ionomer restorations placed using three minimal intervention approaches. Caries Res. 2003;37(4):246-53.
13. Mandari GJ, Truin GJ, van't Hof MA, Frencken JE. Effectiveness of three minimal intervention approaches for managing dental caries: survival of restorations after 2 years. Caries Res. 2001;35(2):90-4.
14. Massara ML, Alves JB, Brandao PR. Atraumatic restorative treatment: clinical, ultrastructural and chemical analysis. Caries Res. 2002; 36(6):430-6.
15. Palma-Dibb RG, Castro CG de, Ramos RP, Chimello DT, Chinelatti MA. Bond strength of glass-ionomer cements to caries-affected dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2003;5(1):57-62.
16. Phantumvanit P, Songpaisan Y, Pilot T, Frencken JE. Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): a three-year community field trial in Thailand - survival of one-surface restorations in the permanent dentition. J Public Health Dent. 1996;56(sp Issue):141-5.
17. Platt JA, Rhodes B. Microleakage of high-strength glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in minimally invasive treatment. J Indiana Dent Assoc. 2001-2002;80(4):20-2.
18. Pereira LC, Nunes MC, Dibb RG, Powers JM, Roulet JF, Navarro MF. Mechanical properties and bond strength of glass-ionomer cements. J Adhes Dent. 2002;4(1):73-80.
19. Hyge G, Snyder M. Evaluating the clinical quality of restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 1973;87:369-77.
20. Smales RJ, Gao W. In vitro caries inhibition at the enamel margins of glass ionomer restoratives developed for the ART approach. J Dent. 2000;28(4):249-56.
21. Souza EM et al. Clinical evaluation of the ART technique using high density and resin modified glass ionomer cements. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2003;1(3):201-7.
22. Taifour D, Frencken JE, Beiruti N, van't Hof MA, Truin GJ, van Palenstein Helderman WH. Comparison between restorations in the permanent dentition produced by hand and rotary instrumentation - survival after 3 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003;31(2):122-8.
23. Taifour D, Frencken JE, Beiruti N, van 't Hof MA, Truin GJ. Effectiveness of glass-ionomer (ART) and amalgam restorations in the deciduous dentition: results after 3 years. Caries Res. 2002;36(6):437-44.
24. Yap AU, Pek YS, Cheang P. Physico-mechanical properties of a fast-set highly viscous GIC restorative. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30(1):1-8.
25. Yu C, Gao XJ, Deng DM, Yip HK, Smales RJ. Survival of glass ionomer restorations placed in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and conventional cavity preparations: 2-year results. Int Dent J. 2004;54(1):42-6.
26. Zanata RL, Navarro MF, Pereira JC, Franco EB, Lauris JR, Barbosa SH. Effect of caries preventive measures directed to expectant mothers on caries experience in their children. Braz Dent J. 2003;14(2):75-81.
27. Zanata RL, Navarro MF, Barbosa SH, Lauris JR, Franco EB. Clinical evaluation of three restorative materials applied in a minimal intervention caries treatment approach. J Public Health Dent. 2003;63(4):221-6.
28. www.ministeriodasaude.gov.br/sb2000