Combining care bundles: A potential hazard of sedation interruption and tight glucose control [16]

Anaesthesia

Volumn 61, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1017-1018

  Watling, Grant ^a   MacDonnell, S ^a   Kasa, S P B ^a   Ruffell, A ^a  

^a East Suffolk and North Essex Foundation Trust   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE; PROPOFOL;

ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BOLUS INJECTION; CALORIE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; DRUG INFUSION; ENTERIC FEEDING; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; GLUCOSE INFUSION; HUMAN; HYPOGLYCEMIA; LETTER; PARENTERAL NUTRITION; PATIENT CARE; SEDATION; SEPSIS;

BLOOD GLUCOSE; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; ENGLAND; HUMANS; HYPOGLYCEMIA; INTENSIVE CARE;

EID: 33748606400     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: 13652044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04813.x     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Kress JP, Pohlman AS, O'Connor MF, Hall JB. Daily interruption of sedative infusions in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. New England Journal of Medicine 2000; 342: 1471-7.
2. Dellinger RP, Carlet JM, Masur H, et.al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Critical Care Medicine 2004; 32: 858-71.
3. Van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, Verwaest C, et.al. Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients. New England Journal of Medicine 2001; 345: 1359-67.
4. Fletcher SJ, Quinn AC. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign and Sepsis Care Bundles: Substance or sophistry? Anaesthesia 2006; 61: 313.