Detection rate of periintestinal lymph nodes: An in vitro study comparing 3-D sonography and histology

Ultraschall in der Medizin

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 360-363

  Christensen, A F ^a   Bourke, J L ^a   Nielsen, Michael Bachmann ^a   Moller H ^a   Svendsen, L B ^a   Mogensen, A M ^a   Vainer, B ^a  

^a Rigshospitalet   (Denmark)

Author keywords

3D endosonography; G I tract; Gastrointestinal tumours; Periintestinal lymph nodes

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT; GASTROINTESTINAL TUMOR; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IN VITRO STUDY; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; PATHOLOGIST; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TUMOR VOLUME;

COLONIC NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LYMPH NODES; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STOMACH NEOPLASMS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 33748605296     PISSN: 01724614     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-858966     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Spinelli P, Schiavo M, Neromi E et al. Results of EUS in detecting perirectal lymph node metastases rectal cancer: the pathologist makes the difference. Gastrointest Endoscopy 1999; 49: 754-758
2. Kawahara K, Maekawa T, Okabayashi K et al. The number of lymph node metastases influences survival in eosophagal cancer. J Surg Oncol 1998; 67: 160-163
3. Kodera Y, Yamamura Y, Shimizu Y et al. The number of metastatic nodes: a promising prognostic determinant for gastric carcinoma in the latest edition of the TNM classification. J Am Coll Surg 1998; 187: 597-603
4. Sultan A, Nicholls R, Kamm M. Anal endosonography and correlation with in vitro and in vivo anatomy. Br J Surg 1993; 80: 508-511
5. Akasu T, Kondo H, Moriya Y et al. Endorectal Ultrasonography and treatment of early stage rectal cancer. World J Surg 2000; 24: 1061-1068
6. Massari M, Simone M, Cioffi U et al. Value and limits of endorectal ultrasonography for preoperative staging of rectal carcinooma. Surg Laparoscop Endosc 1998; 8: 438-444
7. Javaid G, Shah O, Dar M et al. Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in preoperative staging of gastic carcinoma. ANZ J Surg 2004; 74: 108
8. Bergman J, Fockens P. Endoscopic ultrasonography in patients with gastro-eosophagal cancer. European Journal of ultrasound 1999; 10: 127-138
9. Natsugoe S, Yoshinaka H, Shimada M et al. Number of lymph node metastases determined by presurgical ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound is related to prognosis in patients with eosophagal carcinoma. Annals of surgery 2001; 234: 613-618
10. Sakomoto f, Natsugoe S, Yoshinaka H et al. Endosonographic detection of mediastinal lymph node metastasis in superficial carcinoma of the esophagus:assessment by type classification and histiogram. J Gastroenterol 2004; 39: 7-13
11. Hamada S, Akasoshi K, Chijiiwa Y et al. Relationship beteen histological type and endosonographic detection of regional lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer. BJR 1997; 70: 697-702
12. Nielsen M, Qvitzau S, Pedersen J. Detection of pericolonic lymph nodes in patients with colorectal cancer: An in vitro and in vivo study of the efficacy of endosonography. Am J Roentgenol 1993; 161: 57-60
13. Hunerbein M, Gretschel S, Ghadami B et al. Three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasound of the eosophagus. Surg Endosc 1997; 11: 991-994
14. Hunerbein M, Schlag P. Three-Dimensional endosonography for staging of rectal cancer. Annals of surgery 1997; 225: 432-438
15. Hunerbein M, Ghadami B, Gretschel S et al. Three-dimensional endoluminal ultrasound: a new method for the evaluation og G-I tumors. Abdom Imaging 1999; 24: 445-448
16. Christensen A, Nielsen M, Engelholm S et al. Three-dimensional anal endosonography may improve staging of anal cancer compared with two-dimensional endosonography. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 340-345
17. Gritzmann N. Sonography of the neck: current potentials and limitations. Ultraschall Med 2005; 26: 185-196
18. Bali C, Nousias V, Fatouros M et al. Assessment of local stage in rectal cancer using endorectal ultrasonography. Tech Coleprotecol 2004; 8: 170-173
19. Beets-Tan R, Beets G, van der Hoop A. High- resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the the anorectal region without an endocoil. Abdom Imaging 1999; 24: 576-584
20. Rociu E, Stoker J, Marinus J et al. Normal anal spincter anatomy and age- sex- reated variations at high-spatial-resolution MR imaging. Radiol 2000; 217: 395-401