Factors affecting foaming behavior in cellulase fermentation by Trichoderma reesei Rut C-30

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 98, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 753-760

  Zhang, Qin ^a   Lo, Chi Ming ^a   Ju, Lu Kwang ^a  

^a The University of Akron   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell hydrophobicity; Cellulase; Cellulose; Foam; Trichoderma reesei Rut C 30

Indexed keywords

CATABOLITE REPRESSION; CELL HYDROPHOBICITY; CELLULASE DEGRADATION; EXTRACELLULAR PROTEINS; TRICHODERMA REESEI;

CELLULOSE; FERMENTATION; FRACTIONATION; OLIGOMERS;

ENZYMES;

CELLULASE; CELLULOSE; PROTEINASE;

CELLULOSE; ENZYMES; FERMENTATION; FRACTIONATION; OLIGOMERS;

BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; CELLULOSE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FERMENTATION; FRACTIONATION; FUNGUS; IN SITU MEASUREMENT; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CATABOLITE REPRESSION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME SYNTHESIS; FERMENTATION; FOAMING; HYDROPHOBICITY; NONHUMAN; PH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOLID; TRICHODERMA REESEI;

CELLULASE; FERMENTATION; TRICHODERMA;

CELLULASE; CELLULOSE; FERMENTATION; FOAM; FRACTIONATION; OLIGOMERS;

HYPOCREA JECORINA;

EID: 33748605295     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.04.006     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Afolabi, O.A., 1997. Wastepaper Hydrolysate as Substrate and Inducer for Cellulase Production. M.S. Thesis, The University of Akron, Akron, OH.
2. Allen A.L., and Roche C.D. Effects of strain and fermentation conditions on production of cellulase by Trichoderma reesei. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 33 (1989) 650-656
3. Atkinson B., and Mavituna F. Biochemical Engineering and Biotechnology Handbook (1983), The Nature Press, New York, NY
4. Bailey M.J., Askolin S., Horhammer N., Tenkanen M., Penttila M., and Nakari-Setala T. Process technology effects of deletion and amplification of hydrophobins II and I in transformants of Trichoderma reesei. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 58 (2002) 721-727
5. Berghem L.E.R., and Petterson L.G. The mechanism of enzymatic cellulase degradation. Eur. J. Biochem. 37 (1973) 21-30
6. Bollok M., and Reczey K. Cellulase enzyme production by various fungal strains on different carbon sources. Acta Aliment. 29 2 (2000) 155-168
7. Boyles W.A., and Lincoln R.E. Separation and concentration of bacterial spores and vegetative cells by foam flotation. Appl. Microbiol. 6 (1958) 327-334
8. Desouza A.H.G., Tanner R.D., and Effler W.T. The effect of pH and gas composition on the bubble fractionation of proteins. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 28/29 (1991) 655-666
9. Domingues F.C., Queiroz J.A., Cabral J.M.S., and Fonseca L.P. Production of cellulases in batch culture using a mutant strain of Trichoderma reesei growing on soluble carbon source. Biotechnol. Lett. 23 (2001) 771-775
10. Gunjikar T.P., Sawant S.B., and Joshi J.B. Shear deactivation of cellulase, exoglucanase, endoglucanase, and β-glucosidase in a mechanically agitated reactor. Biotechnol. Prog. 17 (2001) 1166-1168
11. Haab D., Hagspiel K., Szakmary K., and Kubicek C.P. Formation of extracellular proteases from Trichoderma reesei QM9414 involved in cellulase degradation. J. Biotechnol. 16 (1990) 187-198
12. Husband D.L., Masliyah J.H., and Gray M.R. Cell and surfactant separation by column flotation. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 72 (1994) 840-847
13. Ju L.-K., and Afolabi O.A. Wastepaper hydrolysate as soluble inducing substrate for cellulase production in continuous culture of Trichoderma reesei. Biotechnol. Prog. 15 (1999) 91-97
14. Klesov A.A., Rabinovich M.L., Sinitsyn A.P., Churulova I.V., and Grigorash S.Y. Enzymic hydrolysis of cellulose. Sov. J. Bioorg. Chem. 6 (1981) 662-667
15. Kokitkar P.B., Hong K., and Tanner R.D. Modeling on-line selective protein recovery from a semi-solid substrate in an air-fluidized bed bioreactor. J. Biotechnol. 15 (1990) 305-322
16. Lambert W.D., Du L.P., Ma Y.F., Loha V., Burapatana V., Prokop A., Tanner R.D., and Pamment N.B. Effect of pH on foam fractionation of beta-glucosidase and cellulase. Bioresour. Technol. 87 3 (2003) 247-253
17. Lee J.M. Industrial applications of enzyme. Biochemical Engineering (1991), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
18. Loha V., Prokop A., Du L., and Tanner R.D. Preserving the activity of cellulase in a batch foam fractionation process. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 77-79 (1999) 701-712
19. Mandels M., Andreotti R., and Roche C. Measurement of saccharifying cellulase. Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. 6 (1976) 21-33
20. Margollas-Clark E., Hayes C.K., Hatman G.E., and Penttila M. Improved production of Trichoderma harzinum endochitinase by expression in Trichoderma reesei. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62 (1996) 2145-2151
21. Marsden W.L., and Gray P.P. Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose in lignocellulosic materials. CRC Crit. Rev. Biotech. 3 (1986) 235-276
22. Miller W.M., Blanch H.W., and Wilke C.R. A kinetic analysis of hybridoma growth and metabolism in batch and continuous suspension culture: effect of nutrient concentration, dilution rate, and pH. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 32 (1988) 947-965
23. Montero G.A., Kirschner T.F., and Tanner R.D. Bubble and foam fractionation of cellulase. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 39/40 (1993) 467-475
24. Ohnishi S.T., and Barr J.K. A simplified method of quantitating proteins using the biuret and phenol reagents. Anal. Biochem. 86 (1978) 193-207
25. Parthasarathy S., Das T.R., Kumar R., and Gopalkrishnan K.S. Foam separation of microbial cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 32 (1988) 174-183
26. Rubin A.J. Microflotation: coagulation and foam separation of Aerobacter aerogenes. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 10 (1968) 89-98
27. Sternberg D., and Dorval S. Cellulase production and ammonia metabolism in Trichoderma reesei on high levels of cellulose. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 21 (1979) 181-191
28. Sternberg D., and Mandels G.R. β-Glucosidase induction and repression in the cellulolytic fungus Trichoderma reesei. Exp. Mycol. 6 (1982) 115-124
29. Tangnu S.K., Blanch H.W., and Wilke C.R. Enhanced production of cellulase, hemicellulase, and β-glucosidase by Trichoderma reesei (Rut C-30). Biotechnol. Bioeng. 23 (1981) 1837-1849
30. Tybussek R., Linz F., Schugerl K., Moses N., Leonard A.J., and Roushet P.G. Comparison of the continuous flotation performances of Saccharomyces cerevisiae LBG H620 and DSM 2155 strains. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 41 (1994) 13-22
31. Varley J., and Ball S.K. Foam separation for enzyme recovery: maintenance of activity. Separat. Biotechnol. 3 (1994) 525-531
32. van der Mei H.C., van de Belt-Gritter B., Doyle R.J., and Busscher H.J. Cell surface analysis and adhesion of chemically modified streptococci. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 241 (2001) 327-332
33. van der Mei H.C., Weerkamp A.H., and Busscher H.J. A comparison of various methods to determine hydrophobic properties of streptococcal cell surfaces. J. Microbial. Meth. 6 (1987) 277-287
34. van Loosdrecht M.C.M., Lyklema J., Norde W., Schraa G., and Zehnder A.J.B. The role of bacterial cell wall hydrophobicity in adhesion. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 53 (1987) 1893-1897
35. Wenzig E., Lingg S., Kerzel P., Zeh G., and Mersmann A. Comparison of selected methods for downstream processing in the production of bacterial lipase. Chem. Eng. Technol. 16 (1993) 405-412
36. Wessels J.G.H. Hydrophobins: proteins that change the nature of the fungal surface. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 38 (1997) 1-45
37. Wosten H.A.B., and Wessels J.G.H. Hydrophobins, from molecular structure to multiple functions in fungal development. Myco-Sci. 38 (1997) 363-374