A parallel explicit/implicit time stepping scheme on block-adaptive grids

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 217, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 722-758

  Tóth, Gábor ^a   De Zeeuw, Darren L ^a   Gombosi, Tamas I ^a   Powell, Kenneth G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Compressible fluids and gas dynamics; Magnetohydrodynamics; Models; Numerical approximation; Numerical methods; Parallel computation; Time dependent initial boundary value problems

Indexed keywords

COMPRESSIBILITY OF GASES; GAS DYNAMICS; INITIAL VALUE PROBLEMS; ITERATIVE METHODS; LINEAR SYSTEMS; LINEARIZATION; MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS;

ADAPTIVE GRIDS; COMPRESSIBLE FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPRESSIBLE GAS DYNAMICS; INITIAL-BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS; NUMERICAL APPROXIMATIONS; PARALLEL COMPUTATION; TIME DEPENDENT; TIME DEPENDENT INITIAL-BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEM; TIME STEP; TIME-STEPPING SCHEMES;

NUMERICAL METHODS;

EID: 33748602934     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: 10902716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2006.01.029     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Axelsson O., and Lindskog G. On the eigenvalue distribution of a class of preconditioning methods. Numer. Math. 48 (1986) 479
2. Balsara D.S. Divergence-free adaptive mesh refinement for magnetohydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 174 (2001) 614 10.1006/jcph.2001.6917
3. Balsara D.S. Second-order-accurate schemes for magnetohydrodynamics with divergence-free reconstruction. Astro. Phys. J. Suppl. 151 (2004) 149
4. Brackbill J.U., and Barnes D.C. The effect of nonzero ∇ · B on the numerical solution of the magnetohydrodynamic equations. J. Comput. Phys. 35 (1980) 426
5. Berger M.J., and Colella P. Local adaptive mesh refinement for shock hydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 82 (1989) 64
6. Dedner A., Kemm F., Kröner D., Munz C.-D., Schnitzer T., and Wesenberg M. Hyperbolic divergence cleaning for the MHD equations. J. Comput. Phys. 175 (2002) 645 10.1006/jcph.2001.6961
7. Dinge D.C., and Woodward P.R. A parallel cell-by-cell AMR method for the PPM hydrodynamics code. Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 14 (2003) 857
8. Evans C.R., and Hawley J.F. Simulation of magnetohydrodynamic flows: a constrained transport method. Astrophys. J. 332 (1988) 659
9. Gottlieb S., Shu C.-W., and Tadmor E. Strong stability-preserving high-order time discretization methods. SIAM Rev. 43 (2001) 89
10. Grauer R., and Marliani C. Current-sheet formation in 3D ideal incompressible magnetohydrodynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 4850
11. Hairer E., Nørsett S.P., and Wanner G. Solving Ordinary Differential Equations I. Nonstiff Problems. Springer Series in Computational Mathematics vol. 8 (1987), Springer, Berlin
12. Hansen K.C., Ridley A.J., Hospodarsky G.B., Dougherty M.K., Gombosi1 T.I., and Toth G. Global MHD simulations of saturn's magnetosphere at the time of Cassini approach. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32 (2005) L20S06 10.1029/2005GL022835
13. Hughes D.W., and Falle S.A.E.G. The rise of twisted magnetic flux tubes: a high Reynolds number adaptive grid calculation. Astro. Phys. J. 509 (1998) L57
14. Keppens R., Tóth G., Botchev M.A., and van der Ploeg A. Implicit and semi-implicit schemes: algorithms. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 30 (1999) 335
15. Keppens R., Nool M., Tóth G., and Goedbloed J.P. Adaptive mesh refinement for conservative systems: multi-dimensional efficiency evaluation. Comput. Phys. Commun. 153 (2003) 317
16. Kleimann J., Kopp A., Fichtner H., Grauer R., and Germaschewski K. Three-dimensional MHD high-resolution computations with CWENO employing adaptive mesh refinement. Comput. Phys. Commun. 158 (2004) 47
17. R.I. Klein, R.T. Fisher, C.F. McKee, M.R. Krumholz, Recent advances in the collapse and fragmentation of turbulent molecular cloud cores, in: ASP Conference Series 323: Star Formation in the Interstellar Medium: In Honor of David Hollenbach, vol. 323, 2004, p. 227.
18. Knoll D.A., and Keyes D.E. Jacobian-free Newton-Krylov methods: a survey of approaches and applications. J. Comput. Phys. 193 (2004) 357
19. Londrillo P., and Del Zanna L. High-order upwind schemes for multidimensional magnetohydrodynamics. Astrophys. J. 530 (2000) 508
20. van der Ploeg A., Keppens R., and Tóth G. Block incomplete LU-preconditioners for implicit solution of advection dominated problems. In: Hertzberger B., and Sloot P. (Eds). Proceedings of High Performance Computing and Networking Europe 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 1225 (1997), Springer, Berlin 421
21. K.G. Powell, An approximate Riemann solver for magnetohydrodynamics (that works in more than one dimension), ICASE Report No. 94-24, Langley, VA, 1994.
22. Powell K.G., Roe P.L., Linde T.J., Gombosi T.I., and De Zeeuw D.L. A solution-adaptive upwind scheme for ideal magnetohydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 154 (1999) 284 10.1006/jcph.1999.6299
23. Rossmanith J.A. A high-resolution constrained transport method with adaptive mesh refinement for ideal MHD. Comput. Phys. Commun. 164 (2004) 128
24. Saad Y., and Schultz M.H. GMRES: a generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 7 3 (1986) 856
25. Samtaney R., Jardin S.C., Colella P., and Martin D.F. 3D adaptive mesh refinement simulations of pellet injection in tokamaks. Comput. Phys. Commun. 164 (2004) 220
26. F. Shakib, Finite element analysis of the compressible Euler and Navier-Stokes equations, Ph.D. Thesis, 1988.
27. Sweby P.K. High resolution schemes using flux Limiters for hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 21 (1984) 995
28. Tóth G. A general code for modeling MHD flows on parallel computers: versatile advection code. Astrophys. Lett. Commun. 34 (1996) 245
29. Tóth G., Keppens R., and Botchev M.A. Implicit and semi-implicit schemes in the versatile advection code: numerical tests. Astron. Astrophys. 332 (1998) 1159
30. Tóth G. The ∇ · B = 0 constraint in shock-capturing magnetohydrodynamics codes. J. Comput. Phys. 161 (2000) 605 10.1006/jcph.2000.6519
31. Tóth G., and Roe P.L. Divergence- and curl-preserving prolongation and restriction formulas. J. Comput. Phys. 180 (2002) 736
32. Tóth G., Kovács D., Hansen K.C., and Gombosi T.I. Three-dimensional MHD simulations of the magnetosphere of Uranus. J. Geophys. Res. (Space Physics) 109 (2004) 11210
33. Tóth G., Sokolov I.V., Gombosi T.I., Chesney D.R., Clauer C.R., De Zeeuw D.L., Hansen K.C., Kane K.J., Manchester W.B., Oehmke R.C., Powell K.G., Ridley A.J., Roussev I.I., Stout Q.F., Volberg O., Wolf R.A., Sazykin S., Chan A., Yu B., and Kóta J. Space Weather Modeling Framework: a new tool for the space science community. J. Geophys. Res. (Space Physics) 110 (2005) A12226 10.1029/2005JA011126
34. van der Vorst H.A. Bi-CGSTAB: a fast and smoothly converging variant of Bi-CG for the solution of nonsymmetric linear systems. SIAM J. Sci. Statist. Comput. 13 (1992) 631
35. Yee H.C. Construction of explicit and implicit symmetric TVD schemes and their applications. J. Comput. Phys. 68 (1987) 151 10.1016/0021-9991(87)90049-0
36. Zanni C., Ferrari A., Massaglia S., Bodo G., and Rossi P. On the MHD acceleration of astrophysical jets. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 293 (2004) 99
37. Ziegler U. An ADI-based adaptive mesh Poisson solver for the MHD code NIRVANA. Comput. Phys. Commun. 157 (2004) 207